Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You have got to be kidding me?! Any other states have this too?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:22 AM
Original message
You have got to be kidding me?! Any other states have this too?
I'm a minister in Florida so I've not encountered this myself. I happened to stumble upon it in a conversation with a minister from Indiana. I'm stunned, just stunned.

In order to obtain a marriage license in the state of Indiana women under the age of 50 must have a Premarital Examination Certificate completed. One of the items on the certificate says, "Applicant presents evidence of sterilization."

So how many men have to have one of these filled out indicating whether or not they present evidence of sterilization? Well, um, that would be....none.

:grr:

Women under the age of 50 in Indiana have to be evaluated as potential breeders before they can legally marry! I don't even live there and I'm outraged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RiDuvessa Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not Illinois.
The only thing we had to do was fill out a couple of forms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. That is...
I don't even know what it is....
:grr:

What the hell business is it of the states whether or not any woman can or even wants to have kids?

You are right in that this is also blatantly sexist. What guy has ever been asked to document his sperm count in order to get married? How is it that people tolerate this sexism?
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Link?
I was married in Indiana and I don't recall having read that and I am confident Mrs. Wickerman would've had soemthing to say about that if it were on the certificate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. answering myself
its to verify rubella.


http://www.helplinelaw.com/law/usa-indiana/marriage/marriage.php

MEDICAL TESTS



Women under the age of 50 must bring a completed State of Indiana Premarital Examination Certificate. These are available through your family doctor or any RediMed, StatCare, or other urgent care clinic. Blood tests or premarital examinations for men are not required.



Physician's report accompanying marriage license application

A clerk of a circuit court may not accept an application for a marriage license unless the application for the license is accompanied by a written report that is prepared and signed by a physician with an unlimited license to practice medicine. The report must contain the following:



(1) The name of the individual who was examined.

(2) A statement that the individual was examined by the physician.

(3) The date that the individual was examined.

(4) If the individual who was examined is a female who is less than fifty (50) years of age, a statement of whether the individual has an immunological response to rubella.

(5) A statement of whether the individual objected on religious grounds to taking a test to determine immunological response to rubella.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Same thing I found, it's not what it sounded like.
The evidence of sterilization was only if someone wanted to be exempted from rubella testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. makes sense
I don't know anything about Rubella, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Me, either, until I read THIS
From Wikipedia:

Rubella (also known as epidemic roseola, German measles, liberty measles<1> or three-day measles) is a disease caused by the Rubella virus. It is often mild and an attack can pass unnoticed. However, this can make the virus difficult to diagnose. The virus usually enters the body through the nose or throat. The disease can last 1-5 days. Children recover more quickly than adults. Like most viruses living along the respiratory tract, it is passed from person to person by tiny droplets in the air that are breathed out. Rubella can also be transmitted from a mother to her developing baby through the bloodstream via the placenta. The virus has an incubation period of 2 to 3 weeks during which it becomes established.

The name German measles has nothing to do with Germany. It comes from the Latin germanus, meaning "similar", since rubella and measles share many symptoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Here you go!
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 01:01 PM by Pacifist Patriot
Link to a .pdf of the required form. http://usmarriagelaws.com/search/united_states/indiana/premarital_exam_form.pdf

As I said, what raises my hackles is the comment about "applicant indicates evidence of sterilization"

Found it linked on this site http://usmarriagelaws.com/search/united_states/indiana/index.shtml

Let me ask this then. What business is it of the state to mandate such testing at the time of issuing a marriage license? Procreation does not require the bonds of matrimony the last time I checked. In my opinion this is a private medical matter between a woman planning to conceive and her medical care givers. It has nothing to do with marriage. Just because someone is married doesn't mean they are going to conceive (and likewise plenty of people conceive without getting married).

The law just doesn't make any sense to me given contemporary circumstances.

Seems like a waste of time, money and a violation of privacy. But I understand not everyone will agree with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. To verify rubella vaccine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. That's not the statement that got me going. I understand...
the rubella concern, although I'm not sure why my friend who had to have a complete hysterectomy at 19 years of age had to fulfill the blood test requirement, but whatever.

I'd like to know what this is supposed to mean "Applicant presents evidence of sterilization."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If the person is sterilized, there's no issue about Rubella
Therefore no reason to test for an immune response to it.

Also, as I recall, some states have conditions where it becomes legal to marry certain people, such as distant relatives, if reproduction isn't possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I understand that. I still think it's silly and invasive. See post above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's a different argument
Whether people think it's silly to require women of child bearing years to have a rubella shot is different than implying women can't get married unless they're proven breeders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Yes I know. Which is why I asked the question.
The law in Indiana, if it is even still on the books, and the form's one statement rubbed me the wrong way. I have learned much through this thread and I appreciate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. We did in CA when I got married.
But, we didn't have fifty states then, lol. I'm not sure if we still have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not in Maryland
There is no such requirement in Maryland. There is a brief waiting period between the time you apply for a license and the time it is issued, between 3 days and a week if I remember correctly. And my husband did have to bring proof that his divorce from his first wife was finalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. In Alaska one used to need a blood test but no longer
I do believe that could be fought in court and found unconstitutional. Equal rights and all. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FILAM23 Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. I do believe your friend is taking things
out of context.
They have to have a blood test to show immunity to rubella OR present evidence of
sterilization. It's one or the other not both. It is a child health issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I've wrapped my brain around that, BUT...
I disagree it is a child health issue these days, at least not a particularly effective way to address it. Otherwise every woman would have to be tested upon the onset of menses. Procreation does not require marriage and marriage needn't result in procreation. I realize many will disagree with me, but it seems to be a ridiculous requirement for a marriage license in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. But what about women like me?
Of child bearing age, not sterilized but married to a man who is because we don't want to have children? Seriously. Would we have to sign an oath or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ariana Celeste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. I live in Indiana and last I heard that's not true anymore
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 02:26 PM by Ariana Celeste
I've been wanting to get married and have looked up a lot of info- none of the websites that say this are Indiana govt. websites, for one thing. My county website says nothing about it. Considering all the other sites, I called a local clinic and a woman there told me it is no longer required.

On edit, this is the info from my county website: http://www.co.hendricks.in.us/portals/0/dept_clerksoffice/documents/Fee-marriage%20license.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Shista! This is sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. I live in Texas
just went to the JP, gave them our information.. got the license and got married....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. WA, they ask you this when apply for license...(too funny)
There we are in the public office, applying for marriage license (to take to ceremony to sign). "Do either of you have undisclosed STDs or are related to each other?" We looked at each other and broke out laughing. (Oh dang honey, there's something I forgot to tell you..., yah, she's mah cuzzin...)

Nothing about ability to fertilize/be fertilized though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. When Mr. B and I got married we both had to go to a doctor
and get blood tests to rule out certain sexually transmitted diseases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC