Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obstructionist Republicans? Frist threatens to filibuster detainee bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:41 AM
Original message
Obstructionist Republicans? Frist threatens to filibuster detainee bill
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 08:42 AM by ck4829
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist signaled Tuesday that he and other White House allies will filibuster a bill dealing with the interrogation and prosecution of detainees if they cannot persuade a rival group of Republicans to rewrite key provisions opposed by President Bush.

Eric Ueland, Frist's chief of staff, called the dissidents' bill "dead."

With Congress scheduled to adjourn in nine days, delaying tactics such as a filibuster could kill the drive to enact detainee legislation before the Nov. 7 elections, a White House priority.

Bush faced still more problems in the House, where GOP moderates Christopher Shays, R-Conn., Michael Castle, R-Del., Jim Leach, R-Iowa, and James Walsh, R-N.Y., publicly threw their support behind the bill opposed by the White House."

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/15562219.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. the irony is so thick you can choke on it.
the gang of fourteen accomplished SO MUCH!

they guaranteed that the only people allowed to filibuster are the neocons.

good job! yes, I'm looking at YOU, DUers who kept arguing we should keep our powder dry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronatchig Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i don' know
but I believe a deadlock with no changes to the law would be a good thing at this point.
Also the "dissidents" can only align themseleves with opponents of Bush to be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm speaking beyond this specific case and more to the point of
how frist can use the filibuster but dems can't.

but I agree with your assessment. I'm just being snarky on the whole filibuster thingy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fine with me. I don't think the law should be changed at all.
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 09:00 AM by w4rma
Just enforce the existing law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. but, but, "up or down vote, up or down vote, up or down vote"?

He should have his up or down vote quotes uttered to him everywhere he goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, he needs to have his ass handed
to him on a paper plate. I cringe when he appears on t.v. I am sorry he is from the state of TN. The poorest specimen of homo sapiens currently lurking in our government. He shames all of us. If he ever runs again I hope it is to the border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Proof of you comment...
This is the spawn of Frist's loins... Jonathan Frist, white supremicist!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Frist knows Bush is in deep shit if Geneva rules aren't amended because
after November elections it'll be too late, Bush is already guilty of war crimes and needs to change the law...again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. george bush nor the congress- can not-change article 3
article three can only be changed by an international meeting of the red cross/cresent and 180 invited nations. the meeting is held every four years and i think it`s not untill 2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC