Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Considering Strip Searching Students

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:49 PM
Original message
Congress Considering Strip Searching Students
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 07:50 PM by Twist_U_Up
When is enough, enough?

http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/091806stripsearch.cfm

Congress Considering Strip Searching Students
September 18, 2006


Imagine an America in which school officials could strip search every student in their school based on the unsubstantiated tip that one of them might have a joint. Congress is voting on a bill Tuesday or Wednesday that could make these police state tactics more common.

We can stop Congress in its tracks, though. Call your representative RIGHT NOW and tell them to vote against this dangerous bill.

If you don't know who your House representative is, simply call the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and give them your address. They'll connect you directly with your representative's office.

..............

The Student Teacher Safety Act of 2006 (HR 5295) is a sloppily written bill that would require any school receiving federal funding (essentially every public school) to adopt policies allowing teachers and school officials to conduct random, warrantless searches of every student, at any time, for essentially any reason they want. All they would have to do is say they suspect one of their students might be carrying drugs, and then they could conduct a wide scale search of every student in the building. These searches could be pat-downs, bag searches, or strip searches depending on how far school administrators wanted to go. Although courts would have the power to overturn policies that went "too far", it could take years - possibly decades - to safeguard the rights of students in every school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. didn't you know?
dignity is for the rich, our leaders, and captains of industry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. How is this different than currently?
It seems to me that with a sworn affadavit, a judge would issue a warrant anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dam make it stop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't there some new law allowing someone ...
to put someone on a sexual registry without due process? Why not use this here? Let's fight fascism with fascism. If anyone tries to do this, register them, from the judge to those performing the searches. Register them as child predators.

Seems fair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A judge has to approve it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. From the article
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 08:10 PM by mongo
"Searching students without individualized suspicion that they have done something wrong fosters mistrust between adolescents and the adults they should feel comfortable turning to when they do have substance abuse problems. Treating groups of students as if they're guilty until proven innocent sends them the wrong message about what it means to be American citizens, and makes them less likely to seek help and guidance when they need it."
-----------------------------------------------

I think the message they are trying to send is that this is EXACTLY what it means to be an American, in a Neo-con America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Weapons and drugs.
The bill was debated this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. This lunacy must stop. Anyone trying that w/my kid better duck. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Republican pervert cops get to "search" naked co-eds law. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. This should tell you how sick our country is.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who introduced this POS
any Democrats supporting it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. the local high school already has dogs and cameras-now strip searches?
I am sooo glad my son started college this year.

I gave him permission last year to not participate in any dog searches, the ones where the kids have to leave their backpack in the classroom when they randomly bring the dog around. As luck would have it the one day they did his classroom we were out of town on vacation.

He doesn't use drugs or drink, it was the violation of privacy and the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure he objected to.

The powers that be are slowly getting our youth accustomed to living in a POLICE STATE and that is NOT what my country should stand for.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC