Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark 'We invaded Iraq to cover up the command negligence that led to 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:22 PM
Original message
Clark 'We invaded Iraq to cover up the command negligence that led to 9/11
http://liberalunderground.activeboard.com/index.spark?forumID=60876&p=3&topicID=7314142

Clark: We invaded Iraq to cover up the command negligence that led to 9/11



Clark Brings Texas Democratic Convention to It's Feet with Rousing Speech by linking 9/11 to Iraq.

Clark spends several minutes blasting Bush for "command negligence" which he says led to 9/11, then culminates with this:

"Now why am I going back over ancient history? Because it's not ancient, because WE WENT TO WAR IN IRAQ TO COVER UP THE COMMAND NEGLIGENCE THAT LED TO 9/11 (crowd rises to it's feet in standing ovation at this point), and it was a war we didn't have to fight.. That's the truth, and I hope, (crowd going wild at this point) I hope every Democrat around the country sees you all on your feet aknowleging the reality of the world we are living in today thanks to the misleadership of this Republican administration. I've been in war, I don't believe in it, and you don't do it unless there is absolutely, absolutely, absolutely no alternative."

This is a great speech to watch in it's entirety, including a splendid introduction to Clark by a Texas supporter. It was about 18 minutes into the speech that Clark brought the crowd to it's feet by linking the 9/11 command negligence cover-up with Iraq. The rest of the speech is also very good, covering education, health care, the importance of science, and the corruption of scientists for political puposes..."That's not America, we could be so much more."

Video link (includes introduction to Clark)




http://youtube.com/watch?v=JpMV2G3TajA&search=wesley%20...



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&a ddress=364x1401315



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. kicky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Busholini Regime Illegally Invaded Iraq for various
reasons. It is too simple to ascribe only one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ray McGovern: ''O.I.L.''
The patriot and former CIA analyst said the acronym is OIL.

It stands for Oil. Israel. Logistics.

Oil. Makes the world go round. Cough.
Israel. Who loves ya, baby?
Logistics. We need military bases near the black gold to keep them Russkies and Chinese away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Brilliant, concise, and comprehensive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. We need to clarify "oil" to be "expensive Arab monarchy OPEC oil"
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 08:53 PM by nealmhughes
Saddam's main threat, as is Iran's, is the threat to spread their revolutions (Baathist and Iranian) outside their own boundaries -- how? By turning the throttle valve Wide Open to the oil flow!

Saddam is thus "Napoleon of the Arabs" and the Ayatollah Khomeini the "Napoleon of the Shiites", fiercely pan-nationalistic and secular in Saddam's case, Shiite and anti-Sunni in the late Ayatollah's; money for advancing their causes and the betterment of the nation, and overthrowingg the decadent monarchies. Horror of horror! Cheap oil by two of the largest exporters?

Iraq was the easy mark: too small to be much of a problem (yeah, right Wofowitz...and Rummy) and very close to the peninsula...a puppet government means "privatization" of the oil (brilliant Mr. Cohen) and continual jitters on the trading floors due to the turmoil in Baghdad. Then what? 3 new US bases? Not "holy" soil so no religious fervor from the ortodox Muslims...

The tying of 911 to Iraq was brilliant disinformation. We got pseudoscholars who are too lazy to teach and get their paychecks from Grove Norquist's bosses who want to make FDR the new Lenin and the whole Talibangelist schedule to tell us how Jesus wants us to KILL! KILL! KILL! or else the Temple can't be built in Jerusalem...and without war in Iraq/Iran the citizens of Tel Aviv will be ankle deep in seawater in a week: well, if the collective Arab/Muslim world wanted to march to Tel Aviv, there aren't enough bombs/bullets to stop them from enjoying the sights of the Tel Aviv waterfront with Arabic music instead of Western/Hebrew playing on the beach. Luckily, they haven't decided to do this yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. This is the man that can win.
Of this, I have no doubt. His biggest hurdle will be to convince the power brokers in the party that he will dance to their tune, otherwise we'll get another corporate whore and things will just get worse and worse.

Is he the next "leader of the free world" or is he the next George Mc Govern?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't that the definition of PRE-MEDITATED MURDER??? nt
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 08:06 PM by fed-up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. This speech is awesome..
... if we could nominate Wesley Clark in 2008, we will win the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlVK Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you Gen. Clark! Now on small request.....
Please don't vascilate from this. Not one iota. And I will continue to cheer you on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Note: Clark made the speech in June, but I missed it
Could we get a button/sign from this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am more and more impressed with Clark as time goes by
he is out there telling the truth and taking the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Please General Clark, It's Time For You To Be Our Commander-In-Chief
I'll be happy to wait (while I work very hard for) 2006, but I'll be there for you in the 2008 campaign!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wish I was there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Great speech by Clark!
He is always right on point, he doesn't pull his punches and he speaks the truth.

Thanks for posting the link to his speech, much appreciated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GETPLANING Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clark could be the next Eisenhower
I know that's saying a lot, but every time I hear Clark speak, I realize he REALLY knows what he is talking about. He has leadership qualities most politicians can only dream of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Here's a couple of pieces for you....in reference to your comment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's a great piece by Quigley
in your first link, Frenchie...

Also, this was a great speech that generated a LOT of excitement, especially at the TX Convention, when he gave it.

Go Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Ovation, Kick, Gratitude and Recommendation
Thanks again, Wes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Oh just brilliant!!!
Give 'em hell Genr'l!!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think they were negligent in order to have a reason to invade
both Afghanistan and Iraq, and to have a new threat to take the place of the communist scare.

Blocking investigations into terror financing is not negligence, it's on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. K & R watching it in the morning.
:kick: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. This country needs Wesley Clark...
I am convinced of it the more I hear him speak. He needs to be in some sort of leadership role, and I'd be more than comfortable with him as President. If he gets the majority of the military command on his side, it's over for the Pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. I enjoyed that, I sure want to see him on our team in '08
Prez, V-Prez, SoS, SoD he could wear any of those hats and make us proud all at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. That's an overstatement.
"We" invaded Iraq because the Bushists had planned to invade Iraq from day one of their illegitimate administration. That it covered up their incompetence in the lead-up to 9/11 was an only incidental benefit for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. That's what has converted me to LIHOP/MIHOP, they stated that
they needed a "Pearl Harbor" http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf">(see REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century) type event to solidify consensus in their favor. By sheer coincidence along comes the eldest(?) son of the BFEE's oldest and closest ally, that just happens to have been the recipient of millions of our CIA dollars, who just happens to manage to pull off a wildly improbable, coordinated attack, that some General (can't remember which one off-hand) declared to be comparable to winning 4 lotteries in a row, and he (OBL) just happens to evade the largest man-hunt in history, and then we coincidentally "find" intelligence that is used to lie us into, coincidentally, the very war they wanted to start in the beginning.

I'm too old, and have spent too much time around these people, to believe this series of coincidences hasn't been orchestrated and helped along with considerable effort. BTW, do you know what most of the people that think of themselves as the ordained rulers of Earth, think the biggest problem on Earth is? The answer is over population, I wonder what they've decided is the best way to fix it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doctor_garth Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. Clark
please make sure you stay out of small planes, ok? you seem like a nice guy, we need you around.

Don't let Bush do to you what the neocons did to Wellstone and Carnahan. Either that or send you to Guantanamo as an enemy combatant, along with the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. What did Clark tell Mike Moore personally...
that led Moore to endorse him?
Was it evidence of this profitable Iraq diversion from their LIHOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Michael Moore's endorsement came via knowledge about Clark's
character. You should check out the story, it's a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Yes, it is a good story....
It all started when General Clark stuck up for Michael Moore after that anti-Bush speech he gave at the Oscars....at a time when no one else would....

Mike tells the story here: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?messageDate=2003-09-12

"Dear General Wesley Clark,

I've been meaning to write to you for some time. Two days after the Oscars, when I felt very alone and somewhat frightened by the level of hatred toward me for daring to suggest that we were being led into war for "fictitious reasons," one person stuck his neck out and came to my defense on national television.

And that person was you.

Aaron Brown had just finished interviewing me by satellite on CNN, and I had made a crack about me being "the only non-general allowed on CNN all week." He ended the interview and then turned to you, as you were sitting at the desk with him. He asked you what you thought of this crazy guy, Michael Moore. And, although we were still in Week One of the war, you boldly said that my dissent was necessary and welcome, and you pointed out that I was against Bush and his "policies," not the kids in the service. I sat in Flint with the earpiece still in my ear and I was floored -- a GENERAL standing up for me and, in effect, for all the millions who were opposed to the war but had been bullied into silence."

much more at the link....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. I love the tone of the speech, but Iraq was planned BEFORE 9-11, so I
don't think it was used to COVER UP for failures in 9-11.

I think 9-11 was used to cover up for their Iraq intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deere_John Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bush is an expert on "failing forward"
Failing forward is drawing attention away from your latest fuckup by doing an even bigger fuckup. Nuking Iran, f'rinstance, would really get people to stop complaining about the mess in Iraq.

Clark really hit the nail on the head. Godspeed Wes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. 911 convenienlty shut down the Fla recount problems. It ALL goes back.
to the stolen election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. People need to get their heads out of their asses and make him President
and that includes Republicans and Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. Wes Clark is a brilliant thinker...and he'd not make this statement
lightly. He believes it and I'm sure has some evidence. That doesn't mean he's right. I'd sure like to see what convinced him. It must be impressive support. I wish he were our president, as I wish Kerery were and Gore too! Oh yeah, Cynthiia McKinney too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clark's the Man
The very type the powers that be will not allow in the presidency because he'd work for substantial change. In other words a threat to the military industrial complex, like JFK was.

Ah the irony, a four-star general is a threat to the war machine built by chicken hawks.

...And the first warning of the military-industrial threat came from a General/Eisenhower...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. I hope he likes tropical environments
The Bushies NEVER forgive and they NEVER forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Are you referring to Gitmo or to Florida?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. By the time we get finished with global warming
it could be Siberia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. (On My Feet, Clapping..!) Sir, You can count on my vote!
...(and I hope my vote counts)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC