Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oldest writing in the New World discovered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:33 PM
Original message
Oldest writing in the New World discovered
A slab inscribed with the oldest writing yet discovered in the New World has been discovered in the Veracruz lowlands in Mexico.

The writing dates back nearly 3000 years to the height of the Olmec culture that was the first Mesoamerican civilisation, Mexican archaeologists report.

Called the Cascajal slab, it had been rescued along with other artefacts from a quarry at Lomas de Tacamichapa, in 1999, where it had been destined for use in road fill.

Isolated symbols have been found on a few Olmec artefacts, but the slab is the first solid evidence of a true written language, says Stephen Houston at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, US, who helped analyse it. (The slab is pictured to the right – scroll down for a clear drawing of the inscribed symbols)

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10076-oldest-writing-in-the-new-world-discovered.html


Will anything the U.S. does last 3000 years? Will we even last 300?...

Anyway, I just thought this was cool and wanted to post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our legacy...
Will anything the U.S. does last 3000 years?


Styrofoam cups and Twinkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. and thus i've now concluded what my pyramids shall be comprised of...
suck it Giza, my pyramids are going to outlast the cockroaches! my styrofoam and twinkies Pyramid to the Sun awaits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our interstates might last a century or two, that's it though
Our roads were never nearly as robust as the roads the Romans built. Asphalt doesn't last as long as concrete made with volcanic ash, which is what Romans used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. It looks like a shopping list.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Jinx! LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It says: "Beware the bush man, vote democrat" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. 35 is a table, and 36 is a couch.
The rest looks like bugs, pineapples, and corn.

12 and 60 look like ice cream cones.

29 looks like a tootsie roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. 35 a knock-down cabinet and 36 is a futon
We're going to Ikea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Perhaps a catalog of "marital aids"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. but seriously, there has been a lot of speculation based upon
similar or identical artistic conventions of a china/olmec connection. Does anyone here have any knowledge of older chinese character styles (grass style or other), to say whether there might be a correspondence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Here's a Shang oracle bone
Frankly, I don't see the resemblance beyond "simple line drawings." Shang is very angular, Olmec is organic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. True, there doesn't seem to be any resemblance
And I dug up a few more illustrations of Shang and An-Yang inscriptions (in books, so no link), no particular correlations.

Most likely the Shang script is angular for the same reason and old Eurpopean runes - working a straight scratched line into a hard substance is fairly easy, while making a curve is difficult. About the only easy way to form curves is with ink on a smooth surface.

Which is another interesting thing about this find - it is engraved on hard stone, using a script which was very unlikely to be developed for working on stone. Suggesting that the Olmecs may have, like the Mayans and Aztecs, traditionally written on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. ... or hides.
For hunter-gatherers and herdsmen, hides would be far more of a utilitarian commodity than paper (or even corn husks).

The curvilinear inscriptions also suggests to me a hammer/chisel inscription method rather than an awl or scribing tool. It makes me wonder about other "civil markings" and the common cultural level of symbolic literacy.

I'm almost totally devoid of any studies into archaeology or ancient civilizations. Something akin to Michener's novels is about it. I just wonder about the implications regarding the GENERAL population's familiarity with such disinterred indications of written symbology. It seesm to me that the implied techniques have implications about how such skills are developed for daily use. Some inscription techniques can be easily regarded as closely-held, like in a secret society or priesthood. Others, like hammer/chisel, would seem to indicate something more generally done yielded the tools and skill set. (Maybe I'm just brain-farting.) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Very good point
Historical mesoamericans made paper out of maguey fiber and wrote or painted with brushes and various pigments. The stone carvings resemble brushstrokes, which would indicate a very long tradition of non-durable literature leading up to the stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Stranger things have happened:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cool!
I can't make heads or tails out of it. Shopping list?...:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. im worried about number 11...
does this mean they invented pac-man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Well, after we find number 11 we'll get an ice cream cone
Check number 12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. Nope, but # 30 does. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. On a global scale, you are probably close.
Chances are this is an accounting of trade goods or goods demanded in tribute.

This is probably the 10th-century BCE version of shopping, when most consumers (rather than producer-consumers) were high-ranking nobles or royalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. I can't make heads or tails about the "pictures" but
I recognize those numbers. Very close to how we write our numbers today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Yes, they must have been incredibly advanced.
Not just because of their numeric system, but also the fact that they could post the link on the internet! Incredible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. 13 looks more like a nuclear missile or a fish... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Keep in mind we don't have the slightest idea how to read it
Is the image even right side up? and if it is, does it read left to right? right to left? up and down?

Looks like there are three ant-like bugs, off the bat. Plus the ants seem to be in close association with what looks like a tulip-like flower and a beetle (1+2; 23, 24 and 26; 50, 51, and 52). I'm betting that 19 and 35 represents a temple or altar. 7 and 40 are maize. 36 and 43 sort of resemble chacmools to me. There also seem to be sacks (10, 25 and 39). The glyph that looks like it has 3 feathers attached to the bottom also appears three times - 8, 41, 62. 8 and 41 in particular follow the corn glyph. There's at least two fish - 13 and 42. 6, 29 and 37 may be stylized birds, parrots perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. #8 clearly represents Mighty Cthulu. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. hmmm...
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 11:53 PM by nebenaube
More practical, for instance a farm's map? Identifying plots of various crops relative to the location of tools and seed stock?


Disclaimer: I claim credit when he figures it out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Good guess but unlikely
There was no large-scale agriculture. No literate farmers. No single farm operation that could hire highly specialized artisans to draw up plans. The priestly/noble class--this is judging from subsequent traditions, since the Olmecs are largely unknown--would have drawn their support from many, many peasant smallholders. The priests did not manage or operate the farms themselves.

My guess is that this records a transaction (trade or tribute) between two tribes or nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. really?
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 10:55 AM by nebenaube
I think you underestimate the people. If they were sophisticated enough to have a noble class structure, they could doodle out a simplistic five acre map on clay to facilitate communication within their community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Could you explain "facilitate communication"?
The question is why, not whether or not they could. Anyone "could" do anything; we aren't any smarter than our Neolithic ancestors. Economics determine what techniques are developed and which ones aren't.

Sure, the Olmecs could have drawn a much more than "simplistic" map of many more than five acres. But their system (conjecturing from Maya, Toltec, and Aztec systems) did not require the management of large-scale farms. Peasants worldwide are capable of managing five or many more acres in their heads, without drawing maps or making lists. The Olmec peasant would have farmed as he had for several thousand years before the dawn of cities/states/writing. The same is true in Egypt, where grain is grown on the Nile flood plain exactly as it was even before pharaonic times. The difference for the peasant, when civilization comes, is that some part of his crops are offered to the god/king, thereby enabling a non-productive class to exist.

The priestly/noble, in other words non-productive class of the Olmecs would have been concerned not with farming techniques but with matters of religion, civil engineering, and the state--hence, the probability that the writing, since it seems to show goods, is a record of an inter-state transaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Peeps will last 3,000 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Please don't tell me . . .
. . . people eat those things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. They don't just eat them....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. don't worry, i'll use them as crown molding on my mausoleum
an eternity of worshipful marshmallow bunnies and peeps. might as well make the archaeologists think they were a symbol of divine protection or something if they're gonna outlast all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. If we inscribe it on stone -- sure it'll last.
But what did the Olmecs have to say? Anything as good as "Moby Dick?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. There once was an Olmec from Oufuc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. It translates as "My Pet Goat"
What goes 'round comes 'round. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. LOL
I really did laugh out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. "Will anything the U.S. does last 3000 years?"
Plastic is forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC