Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG!! Tony Snow SQUIRMING About The "Cruel & Unusual" Shit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:42 PM
Original message
OMG!! Tony Snow SQUIRMING About The "Cruel & Unusual" Shit
They really seem like they are so busted and trying to cover their asses legally....anybody watching this conference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm about to combust. He is pissing me off more with every fucking word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He makes me actually miss Scotty
and, Lord knows, that is saying something because I hated watching Puffy. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm about to put my foot through the TV and shove it down his fucking
throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I do miss Scotty...
he was at least more personable. Tony Snow is nothing but an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Yep. And not a very entertaining one either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Where's Helen Thomas?...
She should laugh at his silly ass and finally tell him "he's just full of worthless shit"...and walk out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Helen was shaking her head sadly as Snow babbled
David and another reporter after him really pinned Snow down while Helen was looking disgusted. There was Snow trying to explain why the Geneva Convention wording needed to be clarified!! Right, clarified to torture legally.

Off subject but, Durbin, on c-span2 now is explaining why this admin. is and has been lying to we the people and talking about Chalibi sitting next to the first lady during SOTU speech - Chalibi, the liar in Chief that bush "chose" to believe to further his war adventures over many in the CIA. He is doing a great job explaining. Never get any other air time sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Watching ...... blurring the debate as usual.
Snow-jobbing the Geneva Conventions ain't he? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. That was
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 01:46 PM by malaise
unfuggingbelievable. They didn't know what it was since 1948? Korean War? Vietnam War -WTF?? The lunatics are in charge of the asylum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's going on? Can you provide more details for those of us without tv?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Suffice it to say that after 60 years, they think it's time to
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 01:48 PM by Texas Explorer
rewrite Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.

Article 3 defines what is a violation of the Conventions.

Reporters are getting pissed too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Little Lord Pissypants is a GENUINE war criminal.
Time to pay the piper, MOFOS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. anyone got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I'm sorry, I've looked for you but all I can offer is CNN Pipeline,
which is where I'm watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. The WH transcript link is finally up, at URL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Journalists are going to be tortured because of what Cheney is doing.
One in every hundred journalists has a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Your post needs to be expanded into a thread.
I'd gladly kick and recommend it so it might reach some of the more teachable 'journalists'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. These people don't care. Human life means nothing to them
They let over 1000 people die in floodwaters they should have been preventing. They have no shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. I wish I was in the goddamn room. FUCK!
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 01:59 PM by Texas Explorer
SOMEBODY SAY IT! FUCK.

READ MY LIPS!

YOU ARE TRYING TO COVER YOUR ASSES!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Fucking COWARD Repoters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. so many so-called American reporter are looking forward to cocktail hour
with the folks whom they stenographer for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. did you see that socalled 'tough' reporter David Gregory on Maher
a few weeks back?

nothing but a lying apologist; claimed the press DID ask the tough questions to the regime during the runup to the invasion! seriously! couldn't believe it. he acted like they're doing a great job--that they're always confrontational, etc. they're living in the same bubble as dumbo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yes, I was VERY disappointed in David Gregory's
appearance on Maher. It wasn't at all what I expected, to the point that I wondered if he'd been threatened or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I saw it - what a let down!
I expected so much more from him. Wondered what was up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. agreed --- in what world did reporters ask tough questions before Iraq???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I'VE HAD IT WITH THESE GODDAMN COWARDS! ARRGGHHH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. "This War Is Like No Other So We Need Re-Definition"
Dick Gregory was great as usual....he was like, "you want to take out the humiliation/dignity part?" No, we want to CLARIFY IT. "Well, Colin Powell, Warner, McCain etc. think you want it out. You want it in?" Tony: "This as never COME UP BEFORE..." somebody says we have been in lots of wars since it was written. YES BUT NOT A GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR....ETC. ETC. ETC.

WHAT AN ASSCLOWN!! They are just trying to save their own evil asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Speaking of clarification, I think it's actually "David" Gregory :)
Thanks for posting his questions -- they are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. "This as never COME UP BEFORE..." ????
"This as never COME UP BEFORE..."

Bullshit! And the Administration knows it.

The historical precedent for this is the Irish struggle for freedom.
Carried on, arguably, for 200, if not 800, years. And the US is kept fully briefed by MI5.

The Irish brought us

1) the Boycott,
2) the use of TNT for non-mining purposes ;-)
3) A "blood sacrifice" (allegorical to suicide bombers) by the sixteen leaders of the 1916 Rising, in Dublin, who were shot down by firing squads (as they knew would happen beforehand)
4) Targeting of "sanctioned targets" for assassination, and

finally, (for now),

5) The parallel operation of any Insurgency's political and military wings.

Think IRA and Sinn Fein = Hamas and Hezbollah


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. A few highlights from the first few pages of transcript: Snow was defensive
defensive and full of doubletalk, and Helen (Thomas?) and Martha (Raddatz?) were especially feisty.

Where is "the battlefield" anyway? In the NYC subways?

From http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060914-8.html :

September 14, 2006 Press Briefing by Tony Snow

MR. SNOW: what's going on in the Senate is that people are looking at some very complex legal issues, trying to figure out how to make good and how to put into legislation the dictates of the Supreme Court's Hamdan decision, which among other things applies Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions to the global war on terror.

The fundamental issue right now, maybe the most important issue, is something the President talked about a week ago, which is a CIA program that involves the questioning of people who have been taken off the battlefield, getting information that can be used to save American lives....

this is an effort not to change or amend Common Article III, but in fact, to give it substance and clarity....

Q You claim -- all right, I'll restate the question. You claim that you are not redefining --

MR. SNOW: Right. Look at this --

Q -- Article III. Everyone who opposes you on this, from Secretary Powell, to Senator Warner, to Senator Graham, to Senator McCain, says, in effect, you are trying to redefine it by excluding language you consider vague that they think is actually important.

MR. SNOW: No, no, no -- oh, thank you, thank you. No, no, that's -- okay, thank you. No, we're not excluding it. We're defining what that language means, so, heart be still. No, the fact is the language is vague, and so nobody knows exactly what would be prohibited or not prohibited under it.

And we're saying, no, here are the things that ought to be prohibited under it. And that's an important point, and I'm glad you asked, because I didn't quite understand. We're saying that the language is vague, and therefore you define it by putting together the proper framework for saying, I'm sorry, if you do this, you're guilty of cruel and inhumane treatment -- or cruel and degrading treatment. You are in violation of Common Article III if you do the following, and the following are the things that are specified in the Detainee Treatment Act....

Q There's been a lot of wars.

MR. SNOW: But, you know what, Helen, it didn't apply to most of those wars. It didn't apply to most of those wars which is why people have not asked the questions.

Q This seems -- hang on a second -- this seems to be --

MR. SNOW: Well, and let me just make the point here, the predicate of your question was, it had been sitting around and everybody knew what the meaning was, and the fact is, nobody knew what the meaning was....

Q All right, the second question is, you kind of laughed off this rumor you said on Capitol Hill that the JAG had been coerced to write this letter.

MR. SNOW: JAGs, yes.

Q The officers, the JAG officers.

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q Senator Graham is telling reporters on Capitol Hill that the White House had them in a meeting for five hours last night and tried to force them to sign a prepared statement. And he said, reading this JAG letter they ended up writing leaves total ambiguity on interpretation. This is Senator Lindsey Graham. What's your response to that?

MR. SNOW: It sounds like he's talking there's a detainee crisis.

Q Wait a minute, I think he deserves an answer, a real answer....

Q But, yes, Colin Powell, what about his larger point, that the world is beginning to doubt the moral basis for the war on terror?

MR. SNOW: I don't think so. Look at what happened on September 11th. You had Jacques Chirac sending regards this week. We've had a number of other people....

Martha.

Q Outside Colin Powell's mind, is that not an issue for this administration? Is that not something you should be thinking about?

MR. SNOW: Well, why do you think -- why on earth, Martha, do you think we're not taking such pains to try to be absolutely transparent and lay out for the entire world not only standards by which we conduct these things, but say to the rest of the world you've got to be precise --

Q But you said, "I don't think so," about moral basis, you didn't think so because Jacques Chirac --

MR. SNOW: He said, "moral basis of the war on terror." The moral basis of the war on terror is -- I don't think you're going to try to claim moral equivalence between George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden. I don't think you want to go there. And that is --

Q I don't think I'd be going there....

Helen.

Q Does the President think water-boarding and all of the other things that we saw at Abu Ghraib were cruel and inhumane --

MR. SNOW: You didn't see water-boarding at Abu Ghraib. What you saw were violations that were immediately prosecuted and vigorously. What the President believes is you need to find ways to question people legally and save lives, and that remains his absolute determination.

Q But has he ruled out those measures?

MR. SNOW: I am not going to go into what's ruled in or ruled out for the same reasons that we've discussed many times here. People who are committing acts of terror pay very close attention to what we say. And if we start specifying means and methods by which people get information, they will adjust....

Q What are other countries to make of the U.S., as you put it, adding definition to the Geneva Convention? Is the U.S., in effect, saying, all the rest of you do this, too -- adversaries and friends, alike?

MR. SNOW: Look, I think this is something that we'd be -- we would not be frightened if adversaries did this. We would not be at all frightened if they did this. I think there's a perception going around that this is going to condone and counsel all sorts of horrible treatment. It's not. And therefore, if we allow -- if we set a standard to treaty obligations that in the past have been vague -- and again, we did it with genocide; we did it with other things. This is not unusual. And I think what we're doing is setting a standard for clarity...

Q So it would be okay if, say, what the President has described as the axis of evil, for Iran, North Korea or Syria or any of those countries to do this --

MR. SNOW: Yes. Yes. Absolutely. The bad news is, quite often the people we're fighting don't give a damn about this. They'd much rather slit a throat on video. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. MR. SNOW: I am not going to go into what's ruled in or ruled out
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 12:36 PM by radfringe
MR. SNOW: I am not going to go into what's ruled in or ruled out for the same reasons that we've discussed many times here. People who are committing acts of terror pay very close attention to what we say. And if we start specifying means and methods by which people get information, they will adjust....

ummm...don't you want CLARITY?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. "Cruel, inhumane, & degrading" aren't clear enough?
How would you want your son or daughter treated if they were taken captive, is what every lawmaker should consider. If the U.S. doesn't take the higher moral ground, then we don't deserve to be treated any better when picked up by the enemy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC