Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greg Palast tells Thom Hartmann that Exxon drops "spy" charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:11 PM
Original message
Greg Palast tells Thom Hartmann that Exxon drops "spy" charges
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 12:14 PM by Bozita
Thom read Greg's email onair.

Greg doesn't know if that's enough for Dept of Homeland Security.

All this for filming near an Exxon facility near NOLA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diogenes2 Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. U.S.E. drops spy charges?
The United States of Exxon is a generous government. The United States of Exxon is a kind government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cookie wookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. We bow before its benevolent
munificence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's bogus. It's petty harassment of a journalist
and we all know it. There is currently no law forbidding photographing or filming much of anything in this country.

Contrast that with France, which has had anti photography laws on the books for years. Tourists are told to buy professional photos and postcards for mementos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Right and BLUE Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Is that for real?!?!?!
I'd be devastated if I couldn't take photos in France. And I will definitely visit some day... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Makes you wonder what Exxon is doing in NOLA
More proof that big oil has hijacked our government is not needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sure damn does!
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Has anyone actually seen the film clip?
Any suspicious wires or anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He's producing a dvd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Cool!
I'll be lookin for that Exxon footage. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There may be something on this on the greatest thread re Palast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Link?
THanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Try here Nikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can anybody point me to the FEMA camp ?
September 14th, 2006
by Greg Palast

Forget the orange suit. Exxon Mobil Corporation, which admits it was behind the criminal complaint brought by Homeland Security against me and television producer Matt Pascarella, has informed me that the oil company will no longer push charges that Pascarella and I threatened “critical infrastructure.”

The allegedly criminal act, which put us on the wrong side of post-9/11 anti-terror law, was our filming of Exxon’s Baton Rouge refinery where, nearby, 1,600 survivors of Hurricane Katrina remain interned behind barbed wire.

I have sworn to Homeland Security that we no longer send our footage to al-Qaeda — which, in any case, can get a much better view of the refinery and other “critical infrastructure” at Google Maps.http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=4045+Scenic+Hwy,+Baton+Rouge,+LA+70805&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=30.487143,-91.169143&spn=0.016531,0.054245&t=k&om=1&iwloc=A

Given Exxon’s back-down, I hope to confirm with Homeland Security, Baton Rouge, that charges will be dropped today.

Matt and I want to thank our readers and viewers for your extraordinary and heartfelt responses. Public support undoubtedly led Exxon to call off the feds.

http://www.gregpalast.com/reporter-palast-slips-clutches-of-homeland-security#more-1488
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ah, there is that word again 'spy'.
Watch it, this is part of their new agenda. They can't arrest people for being terrorists, the story just won't stick on people like GP. So...they come up with an old word trick. No one says WHO the spy is working for, secret court and a secret organization handle all that. Make something up? If you don't believe they will, then you've been asleep since Reagan was in office! Wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC