Despite the fact that the bushes "fix" to Social Security, or privatization of SS, is very unpopular, he keeps making it a priority. Why??? The bushes call Social Security an entitlement, implying that SS is a benefit and not a legal or implied guarantee from the government but simply welfare for the Middle Class. Why?
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush hopes to revive his plan to overhaul the U.S. Social Security retirement program if his Republican party keeps control of the Congress in the November midterm elections, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday."
"Bush made Social Security investment accounts a top domestic priority for his second term, arguing such a system would help young people by putting the retirement program on a more sustainable financial footing."
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2006-09-09T185922Z_01_N09399044_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-SOCIALSECURITY.xmlThe fake group "Women for a Social Security Choice" even states flat out - Social Security must be fixed and reformed because Social Security is trillions of dollars in debt and cannot pay future promised benefits and because none of us has a legal right to a benefit.
http://www.womenforsschoice.org/main.htmHere is the History: In 1988 Raygun gave a huge tax cut to the wealthy reducing the top marginal income tax rate from 50% to 28%. But this brilliant move created a huge budget deficit.
At the same time, actuaries at the Social Security Administration were beginning to worry about Baby Boomers who would begin retiring in 2020 and noticed a bulge in the amount of money needed to fund the Boomer's' SS.
The solution Raygun and Greenspan came up with was to double the SS tax on the then-working Boomers. This created a giant savings account that would be used to pay for the Boomers' retirements. Prior to this double tax, SS had always paid for today's retirees with income from today's workers. We Boomers were the first generation to pay both for our parent's retirement and our own retirement at the same time.
But Raygun still had that pesky deficit. No problem suggested Greenspan, just borrow from the Boomer's savings account. Because the repukes were borrowing government money to fund government expenditures, they didn't have to list it as part of the deficit. The deficit magically disappeared. They hoped no one would notice. (Deficit's don't matter if you rip off the SS Trust Fund.)
Raygun, bush-1 and Clinton borrowed from the Boomer's savings account to hide the deficit. Trillions of dollars taxed out of the Boomers have been spent. What is left behind is a treasury debt instrument similar to what the treasury normally uses to fund the government's borrowing.
But where will the money come from (almost $2 trillion) when Boomers begin to retire?
Technically and legally, the SS Trust Fund will turn in their treasury debt instruments to the Treasury and get their money back. But with our current massive budget deficit, how can they borrow $2 trillion in a massive lump sum without bankrupting the country?
There is a crisis in SS coming but it is one created and perpetuated by the republican party.
bush-2 needs to gut Social Security before the financial crisis begins. If he privatizes it, then it will be destroyed. That is why it is a priority for the bushes. They are trying to hide their reckless disregard for the Social Security Trust Fund and the retirement of the Baby Boomers.
Is it an entitlement? Damn straight it is. We Baby Boomers have not only paid for our own SS, we have paid for our parent's. It is what Raygun and the republican party promised us for doubling our taxes. It is an implied guarantee for taking our hard earned money at twice the rate of previous years. Raygun, with the help of Greenspan, set the course to steal our Social Security. And bush-2 wants to hide that theft by destroying SS.
This is also what Thom Hartmann says in his book Screwed The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class.