U.S. Press Bigwigs Screw Up, Again
By Robert Parry
September 14, 2006
So, right-wing columnist Robert Novak now says that Richard Armitage, Novak’s initial source on the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame, wasn’t just some loose-lipped gossip blurting out her name, but rather that Armitage urged Novak to write about Plame’s alleged role in her husband’s fact-finding trip to Niger.
In a Sept. 14 column, Novak calls Armitage’s depiction of their conversation in July 2003 “deceptive” for suggesting that his leaking of Plame’s CIA identity was innocent and inadvertent, when Novak recalled it as intentional and even calculating.
Yet, for the past two weeks, major Washington journalists have been treating Armitage’s account as the gospel truth and, further, as proof that George W. Bush’s White House had gotten a bum rap on the Plame-leak scandal.
This misplaced “conventional wisdom” extended from the Washington Post’s editorial pages to virtually every major TV chat show – and even touched off another round of personal attacks by Bush allies against Plame’s husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, for having dared to stand up to the President over his false claims that Iraq sought uranium ore from Niger.
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/091406.html