Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Parry on Armitage outing Plame: U.S. Press Bigwigs Screw Up, Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:34 AM
Original message
Robert Parry on Armitage outing Plame: U.S. Press Bigwigs Screw Up, Again
U.S. Press Bigwigs Screw Up, Again
By Robert Parry
September 14, 2006


So, right-wing columnist Robert Novak now says that Richard Armitage, Novak’s initial source on the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame, wasn’t just some loose-lipped gossip blurting out her name, but rather that Armitage urged Novak to write about Plame’s alleged role in her husband’s fact-finding trip to Niger.

In a Sept. 14 column, Novak calls Armitage’s depiction of their conversation in July 2003 “deceptive” for suggesting that his leaking of Plame’s CIA identity was innocent and inadvertent, when Novak recalled it as intentional and even calculating.

Yet, for the past two weeks, major Washington journalists have been treating Armitage’s account as the gospel truth and, further, as proof that George W. Bush’s White House had gotten a bum rap on the Plame-leak scandal.

This misplaced “conventional wisdom” extended from the Washington Post’s editorial pages to virtually every major TV chat show – and even touched off another round of personal attacks by Bush allies against Plame’s husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, for having dared to stand up to the President over his false claims that Iraq sought uranium ore from Niger.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/091406.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R - I am going with "willfully obtuse" or even worse... complicit.
"Yet, David Broder and many other Washington journalists either still don’t get it – how the administration set out to destroy this couple and make them an example for other potential critics – or perhaps the pundits are as willfully obtuse as the corrupt prison warden in “Shawshank Redemption.”"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Complicit - come on... apologize to Rove? What a crock of a setup.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. amateurish even. they may choose to spew it, but we don't need to buy it
and we don't. They appear to be quite happy playing to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Both Armitage and Novak et al
should be prosecuted for this crime of subversion. Novak is admitting that he knew the leak was intentional so he is just as guilty for outing Valerie Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Either way, the media failed in their ethical responsibility to
...get it right. If not for a handful of journalists with integrity, we would be completely in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here is the official book they used to out her.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC