Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak contradicts previous recollection of how he got the Plame info

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:25 PM
Original message
Novak contradicts previous recollection of how he got the Plame info

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3131258/

MSNBC
Oct 6, 2003

<snip>

Russert: So you do not believe that they were trying to plant the story with you?

Novak: Absolutely not. I have been a plantee in this town for over 40 years. I know when somebody’s trying to plant a story. This thing—this came up almost offhandedly in the course of a very long conversation with a senior official about many things, many things, including Ambassador Wilson’s report.



In 2003, Novak claims there was no story plant, and the info just came across "offhandedly". However, in today's revelation he claims that Armitage was very specific and even recommended putting it in a column. Additionally, he indicates that Armitage out of no where, after 2 years called him up for a meeting...


http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-edt-novak14.html

Novak: Real story behind Armitage's role
September 13, 2006

<snip>

First, Armitage did not, as he now indicates, merely pass on something he had heard and that he ‘‘thought’’ might be so. Rather, he identified to me the CIA division where Mrs. Wilson worked, and said flatly that she recommended the mission to Niger by her husband, former Amb. Joseph Wilson.

Second, Armitage did not slip me this information as idle chitchat, as he now suggests. He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column.

...

A peculiar convergence had joined Armitage and me on the same historical path. During his quarter of a century in Washington, I had no contact with Armitage before our fateful interview. I tried to see him in the first 2 years of the Bush administration, but he rebuffed me — summarily and with disdain, I thought.

Then, without explanation, in June 2003, Armitage’s office said the deputy secretary would see me. This was two weeks before Joe Wilson surfaced himself as author of a 2002 report for the CIA debunking Iraqi interest in buying uranium in Africa.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. You may recall
that our toothless little lap dog Novak had snapped, "I didn't go to them for this -- they brought it to me!" in the late summer of 2003.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. indeed.
His story gets more and more blurry every time he opens his mouth. Additional today one would conclude that according to Novak, Armitage was trying to "plant" the story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because Novak has
been suspected by the FBI of planning a strategy with Rove in the early days of the investigation, to keep Karl from being fired like he was in the Bush1 days, I think the Wilson legal team needs to depose Mr. Armitage. There are some interesting issues involving timing here. Think of the fellow who ran into Novak that July day, when Novak was barking about "that asshole" Wilson's wife -- and her role at the CIA. Hmmmm? And Armitage didn't know? Then who told Novak? At what time did he speak to Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. One gets the feeling that this story is far from over
With all that testimony already taken under oath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't keep the lies straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Poor dehydrated Bob!
Brought out from mothballs this summer, to try to create a stir in the weeks before the Wilsons filed their civil suit. Perhaps now he realizes that the Wilson's legal team may be preparing to depose him. Think quick, Bob! Get your sad story straight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Novak had two sources
Armitage being one of them does not disprove that there was an agenda to leak the name from the White House. Novak's implication that it disproves White House involvement shows how with the White House program Novak is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. gee, which time was he lying?
my guess: BOTH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC