Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is probably the first book I read after the election.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 04:19 PM
Original message
This is probably the first book I read after the election.
"How Bush Rules" by Sidney Blumenthal.

He really hit a home run with "The Clinton Wars", and I only subscribe to Salon to read his columns.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/book_title/how_bush_rules

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/bookclub/2006/sep/13/base_bush_and_bushs_base

By Todd Gitlin | bio

Reading Sid’s invaluable, rightly unnerving columns, I’ve also been musing about David Greenberg’s question: Bush’s responsibility. It’s immense, and Sid properly nails many instances where Bush’s self-intoxicated admixture of bulldozer willfulness, pseudo-godliness, and unacknowledged ignorance have made the proverbial difference. No question but that Bush himself, Bush the pretender, is indispensable to the victory of the radical pseudo-conservativism of his government. Cheney may be the brains in this brainlessness, but Bush and Cheney have fashioned a division of malevolent labor that works for both of them, and Bush is, I don’t doubt, ultimately the decider-in-chief.

That much is straightforward, I think. But it also must be said that Bush incarnates certain potentials long embedded in movement conservatism, potentials that, in combination, add up to a whole drastically worse than the sum of the parts: ignorance of the larger world; deafness toward reason; vindictiveness toward dissidents; cronyism; systematic deception; fiscal recklessness; centralization of power and its abuses. Reagan began the process of conservative consolidation, but Bush has the energy, focus, and vindictiveness that Reagan lacked. He also, not least, had September 11.

The magic has worn thin, but never forget that base Bush is the voice of Bush’s base. Republican control of all branches of government has certainly afforded Bush the means to act on his tunnel vision. It’s a necessary condition. So are the Rove-Ailes-Atwater commitments to what Spiro Agnew (or wasn’t it elder literary statesman William Safire?) once called “positive polarization.” But the will of the bulldozer is essential to understanding the magnitude of the ruination that Bush has accomplished.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC