Democracy Now- Popular Mechanics vs Loose Change

[IChing]

Interesting show,

[IChing]

1. Good debate between

the "Debunking 911" authors and the members of" Loose change".

[greenman3610]

2. I'm listening, and I'm sympathetic to LIHOP/MIHOP

but the Loose Change guys are not
coming off all that well, and I don't
think Amy is guiding the conversation
well.

My primary questions are not getting
answered.

[HamdenRice]

3. Sadly, Loose Change guys are not good reps of truth movement

Amy Goodman seems to be firmly opposed to any alternative explanations of 9/11 and she chose pretty bad spokespersons for the 9/11 truth side, namely the Loose Change guys.

They seem to focus on some of the most improbable aspects of 9/11 skepticism -- like no planes at the pentagon, no plane in Pennsylvania, controlled demolition -- whereas a lot of the truth movement has moved on to the well documented intelligence and financial ties between the Bush administration and the hijackers.

I almost got the impression that they were chosen by Goodman precisely because they are not very good at getting at the real evidence of MIHOP/LIHOP.

[meganmonkey]

4. Wouldn't surprise me

that its deliberate. I'm shocked she's even talking about it.

I listen to her show a lot because it airs locally in Detroit, and I think she does a great job covering certain things. But 9/11 is not one of them, imo.