Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Major LA TImes article: HIdden Depths to U.S. Domestic Surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:51 AM
Original message
Major LA TImes article: HIdden Depths to U.S. Domestic Surveillance
FIVE YEARS AFTER
Hidden Depths to U.S. Monitoring
The scope of domestic surveillance has steadily expanded since 9/11. But lawmakers and privacy experts complain of too little information on it.
By Josh Meyer, Times Staff Writer
September 11, 2006

....In the five years since the attacks, the scope of domestic surveillance has steadily increased, according to interviews with dozens of current and former U.S. officials and privacy experts.

Some of these programs have been debated and approved by the courts and Congress — the traditional checks against intrusions on Americans' privacy, protected under the 4th Amendment.

Others have not. Some of them are operating without the knowledge or approval of judicial and legislative overseers, officials and experts say.

Two such classified programs have been disclosed by the media, over the objections of the Bush administration. One involves the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping of suspicious phone calls and e-mails into and out of the United States. The other is an effort by the Treasury Department and the CIA to monitor international bank transfers.

Privacy experts and even some ranking lawmakers in Congress say their efforts to learn about other suspected surveillance efforts have been blocked.

They believe that some of the activity is so secret that none but a small circle of top administration officials and operational support personnel know about it — though notification of congressional leaders is legally required....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-surveillance11sep11,0,2490769.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. The executive branch hates us for our freedoms
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I find it strange that Meyer cites 9/11 as if it was the precipitating
event.

It wasn't. Bush in office was the precipitating event. I think that matters if we're to fully understand what this government is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only going to get worse
The UK is the most watched society in the western world, if not the whole planet. That was happening before 9/11.

Society requires order, and people won't stand for forced order. That would actually get people upset. If they do it so that you don't see them, it's much easier. The technology for it will only get better, and smaller. It will be a problem well after this administration is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. UBL must be tickled by the Bush's RW reaction in Iraq and domestically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. 9/12 kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC