Suppose just for a minute that Path to 9-11 was a true account

[Toots]

Wouldn't that information be confidential? Wouldn't it be illegal to divulge it in a movie? How can Berger sue ABC when the information is truly confidential and he can not use it in his defense? :shrug: Should ABC be held to the same standards as they are trying to hold New York times?

[Lost4words]

1. Then that would mean there was still truth in broadcasting,

and Al Gore would be president in his second term. People would have jobs and, well it isnt.

Reagan removed the requirement that the broadcastrs provide accurate truthful information, its been INFOTAINMENT ever since.

sorry to brake it to you.

[Toots]

2. Then what is the big hub ub over NY Times?

:shrug:

[Lost4words]

4. sorry Toots, I dont know what you are referring to.

I dont pay any attention to the NYT?

Enlighten me.

[zbdent]

5. I still say that, had Gore been the recipient of Sandy's vote,

the attacks of 9/11/2001 would not have taken place because the Reich-wingers would have been fomenting a civil war, spearheaded by the NRA surrounding the White House, bayonets at the ready, screaming that Gore needed to get out of Bush's house ...

The civil war would still be raging, to this day ...

[Lost4words]

6. That would not be so bad, It would cause the Dems to respond in kind.

to the traitors attacking the WH.

What if?

When all those yuppie congressional aids rioting at the Florida election office that day.

Had some brave sole entered into the room with an uzi and shot and killed most of them and of course died in the process. The media would have to report their names and their occupation and what they were doing there. That awfully dirty trick would have been exposed early and might, I said might, have opened the eyes of the sheeple possibly changing history.

But hell there are all million airs now.

8643

[sentelle]

3. Here's the amusing thing

Right after PT 9/11, here on the west coat at least, they showed an 'extended' (which means shorter ironically) NIGHTLINE.

They admitted that there was no americans on the ground in afghanistan pre-9/11.
Additionally, they stated that there were numerous plans drawn up. Only two went beyond the planning phase.

The first was when Masood (the northern alliance guy) was going to bring in OBL. Here's the issue (per NIGHTLINE)
1. There was the possibility of civilian casualties.
2. OBL had machine gun nests, and tanks at his disposal at that place. Therefore it was thought that Masood's plan was suicidal.
It was George Tenet (not Sandy Berger) who stopped that operation.

The second was the tomahawk strike.

I think that at this point, Sandy Berger just needs to name a number. When ABC news debunks ABC Infotainment, I think that they have already proven the lie.