Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woah, just saw something on History Channel, United flight 23

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:25 PM
Original message
Woah, just saw something on History Channel, United flight 23
from Newark to LAX on 9/11 about to take off, got a message from dispatch about hijackings, the pilot taxiied back to the gate and several 'unruly' 'middle-eastern' men ran off the plane & disappeared. Al-Qaeda "instructions" and false IDs found in their baggage, the guys were never found...

I NEVER heard this story before...did I just miss it somehow?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never heard it.......sounds fishy.
This would have been all over the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Okay, I thought maybe I had somehow overlooked it 5 years ago
I have no idea where this came from but I promise I reported it as they told it just a few minutes ago.
(I TIVOd it and replayed to make sure what was said)

good grief...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I JUST heard this for the first time too.
All this "new information". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hadn't heard it either, but sounds like it's been timed about right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. They just 'ran off the plane'? How'd they do that? I never heard
this story either; does this admin own a piece of the History Channel, and are they catapulting their terra propaganda in new and inventive ways? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Actually the History Channel is owned jointly by
Disney/ABC, Hearst, and NBC Universal. It's part of the A&E Network. I personally think they show too much religious history. Lots of specials trying to debunk the Da Vinci Code seem to be on lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So they're another r/w tool. Go figure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Yeah pretty much everything on TV will be crap these days
thanks to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Rethuglican Party. Cheap, repetitive programming that doesn't require much thought is all we will get from any of those greedy corporations. Infomercials, car chase shows, 25 channels of church crap, and opinionated propoganda that masquerades as news. The amazing thing is the whole country has developed a weird psychosis thanks to "that box" we call the TV. If we all just shut it off we could get our sanity back. The war would go away if no one watched it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No, the criminals would get away with more if no one was
paying attention imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not buying that one. After all this time, THAT kind of info would
have been EVERYWHERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teamster633 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just saw this listing as well:
American Vesuvius Scientist Charles Pellegrino examines the similarities between the eruption of Mount Vesuvius and the cataclysm of Sept. 11, 2001

I mean really...WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
6.  I found some more info here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Interesting, those posts 5 months ago.
I don't know what the hell to think about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. More here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. and here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Did you see this comment at that forum:
"The only part of this story I find suspect is that UA23 is/was a JFK-LAX flight, not EWR-LAX."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. The link in 27 states ewr?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. comment # 4 here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I remember hearing that one......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know
There was also a third plane at the wtc, which was coverd up
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFk_1i2NRmo



You can download a good book with all the conflicting evidence which points to patsies.
http://www.911review.org/T8_img/TEXT.zip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SledDriver Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. The (revisionist) History Channel has about as much credibility
as Bushco. If this were true, the talking heads would be using it. Also, if it is true, it's another Bushco failure. Why weren't they tracked down and questioned? Their baggage would be a big clue and a good place to start.

Sounds like a bunch of made up BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Why were Bush & Cheney not questioned under oath?
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 06:35 PM by FoxOnTheRun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I know nothing about the 'History Channel', just happened to see it
they SAID the baggage contained Al Qaeda "instructions" and false IDs and authorities were never able to figure out who these supposed guys were. I agree it smells like a sardine factory but it sure seems odd this "information" (if any of it's true...or not, even) kept so low under the radar for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let's use a little common sense here.
First, if Flt 23 had been notified ofhijackings, and especially ifthey were suspect, they would NEVER have taxied back to the GATE! Think about it. When they are afraid of a problem on a flight, that plane is ALWAYS told to taxi and PARK at a remote section of somepart of the airport grounds. The authorities want to isolate it as far from everyone else as possible, until the problem is either confirmed or found to be false.

I have no idea how THIS kind of story ended up on the History Chanel, butbelieve me, even if the initial part of a warning to a flight was issued prior to takeoff, the rest of the story is bogus!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. good point!!
That's true........at that point, they would not have known if there may be a bomb onboard. Why would the bring the plane back without checking it out first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. I have no axe to grind here, but trying to be objective:
The way it was told is that the Captain made the decision to return to the gate. He HAS that authority under every FAA rule - he/she cannot be over-ridden. Maybe the story is completely made up...but if it is, why???...and by whom??? That's all I'm saying (asking, actually.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Easy to find

Did a searh on 911 "Flight 23" baggage - lots of links

Here's one
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091901abortedflights

It's in the section
"September 19, 2001: Unverified Reports of Additional Flights to Be Hijacked"

"There may have been an attempt to hijack United Airlines Flight 23 flying from Boston to Los Angeles around 9:00 a.m. Shortly after 9:00 a.m., United Airlines flight dispatcher Ed Ballinger sent out a warning about the first WTC crash to the flights he was handling (see (After 9:00 a.m.)). Because of this warning, the crew of Flight 23 told the passengers it had a mechanical problem and immediately returned to the gate. Ballinger was later told by authorities that six men initially wouldn’t get off the plane. When the men finally disembarked, they disappeared into the crowd and never returned. Later, authorities checked their luggage and found copies of the Koran and al-Qaeda instruction sheets. In mid-2002, a NORAD deputy commander says “we don’t know for sure” if Flight 23 was to have been hijacked. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Thanks. I should have done some research before my OP
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't buy this story at all.
Once the doors are closed, no one leaves the plane. Besides, have you ever tried geting off a plane? No way would a group of unruly men have run off - too many people would have been standing in the aisle jamming stuff into the oerheads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. it sounds fishy to me too!
For one thing, all of the hijackers that day, used their real names! No aliases or fake IDs necessary.

And even if these middle eastern guys were planning on hijacking the plane, why would they give themselves away....or draw attention to the fact that their plan failed by being unruly?

I suspect if the story is true, we would have heard about it long before now!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. I remember hearing about this at the time
they held the plane on the ground because of these guys who seemed to be another hijack team. However, after a few hours they let everyone go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. I watched Tom Brokaw last night
He had all the ATC's involved in tracking the hijacked planes, and there was absolutely nothing like this mentioned. God, it was a sad show, one ATC had to take 6 weeks off because of stress and depression...all are still very much affected by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. And another from Boston had arrived at work AFTER dropping his wife
off at Logan airport for a flight. Turns out she was on one of the ill-fated planes. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. So the ID's were false...
hmm...Interesting trend...

The BBC reported back in September 2001 that 6 of the hijackers were still alive:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

The Washington Post reported last Friday that the BBC retracted that article although no one can find the retraction and the article is tstill on their website:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/07/AR2006090701669_pf.html

Paul Thompson's website has a fascinating essay titled "The Two Ziad Jarrahs":
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/essay.jsp?article=essayjarrah

And of course, my personal favorite ID story from 9/11 -- al-Suqami's passport surviving the inferno at the World Trade Center:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2004/230804visafound.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC