Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could you protest introducing the Bible in schools, not on the basis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:59 PM
Original message
Could you protest introducing the Bible in schools, not on the basis
of separation of church and state, but on the basis that the Bible is full of sex and violence and lying and cheating and kids should not be exposed to it?

A few examples:

Genesis 19 Lot offers to give his daughters to a crowd of men who want to rape the men who are spending the night with Lot's family.
Genesis 19 Lot's daughters get him drunk and sleep with him and get pregnant.
Twice in Genesis Abraham passes Sarah off as his sister rather than his wife.
Genesis 25 Jacob screwed his brother out of his father's blessing by disguising himself as his brother to fool his blind father.
Genesis 38 Judah tells his son Onan to screw his dead brother's wife so she can have kids. He "spills his seed on the ground" and God strikes him dead. Then the daughter in law dresses as a prostitute and Judah screws her and gets her pregnant. When he finds out she's pregnant he tries to have her stoned but she has his seal and he doesn't want Wifey to find out he impregnated the daughter in law.

These are all in the first book of the Bible. Would you want your kids exposed to this kind of reading?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. the only problem with that is
The Gideons tend to pass out New Testament only.

There may be a little violence but nothing like the OT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep they do
The far right wants only King James Bibles in the Schools and other places . Sorry not my bible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. not much violence in the NT?
Check Revelation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Bible was banned in a school district in NC for those reasons
That's been probably 20 years ago, the specific case I'm thinking of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. You would have a harder time of that, than the issue of separation
of church and state. That to me is the real issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Using that angle, yes, yes you can
Schools can and have banned books from the curriculum in the past because parents called in to complain about the content of those books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. sex and lies and cheating and violence...
is not a good reason to keep it out of schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hpot Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ken's Guide to the Bible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Genesis 19
Is often used by the fundies to argue against homosexuality - as in that's the reason God destroyed Sodom and Gammorah, but the actual Hebrew text concerning the incident can be used as "have relations with" (a common translation) but is more commonly used for just "talk to," and the meaning didn't really start to change over to the have relations with translation until the 1800s I think.

Anyway, I just thought I'd let you in on that.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC