Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, who do you think runs Disney, anyway? Halliburton, among others.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:16 AM
Original message
So, who do you think runs Disney, anyway? Halliburton, among others.
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 09:58 AM by leveymg
The Disney Board of Directors also sit on other big companies. That makes control over Disney "interlocked" with, among other huge multinational corporations, Halliburton, Boeing, and Edison Electric.

So, why should anyone be surprised that ABC is going to run GOP propaganda? After all, the Bush Administration and the Republican Party are also wholly-owned by the same companies.

Now, let's take a look at the corporate profile of the four, major broadcast TeeVee networks in America: ABC; CBS; NBC; and, FOX.






ABC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Disney Corporation. Here's the corporate biography of the Disney Board. http://corporate.disney.go.com/corporate/board_of_directors.html

These guys aren't cartoon animators. The Board Members also run Defense contractors, energy companies, along with the usual throw-away consumer goods makers and big global banks.





Then, there's Viacom which spun off CBS late last year into a second subsidiary owned by 81-year old Sumner Redstone and his family. http://www.viacom.com/directors.jhtml

While in the past, Redstone described himself as a "liberal Democrat", that may not be the case. In 2005, the Center for Public Integrity observed: http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/report.aspx?aid=407

Sumner Redstone tacitly endorsed George Bush for re-election in late September, at a meeting of CEOs in Hong Kong. The election of a Republican administration, Redstone told his audience, "is a better deal" in Viacom's view, "because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on."

Newsweek reported that Redstone's remarks were viewed by many as a breach of an understood code of silence regarding political endorsements that most media conglomerates respect. Several other executives from the top broadcasters were asked to comment, and most repudiated any notion of political favor, while a public interest lobbyist pointed to the remarks as evidence of "what we have known all along"—a comfortable relationship between the industry and its government regulators.

When asked to comment on Redstone's endorsement of Bush, a News Corp. spokesman told Newsweek, "We run these businesses not to promote an ideology or political agenda, but to make them successful."






NBC has long been a subsidiary of General Electric Corp., GE, which is a one of the world's largest conglomerates. It is also a major financial institution, and defense contractor. The Board is interlocked with an equally wide swath of global corporate interests, including Bechtel. http://www.ge.com/en/company/companyinfo/executivebios/board_of_directors.htm





You've heard of Rupert Murdoch. Haven't you?

Well, who else runs News Corporation? Kinda hard to tell, because unlike the other major broadcasting companies, News Corp. doesn't provide on-line biographies for its Board, just names and titles. http://www.newscorp.com/corp_gov/bod.html

Nonetheless, Viet Dinh is no doubt an interesting recent addition, having been plucked directly out of the Bush Justice Department, where he drafted both the Patriot Act and the torture memos.

*****

And they call this the "liberal" media?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended #4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great post, m - will K&R.
Thanks for being an anti-corruption hawk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is a reality that goes unacknowledged and ignored all too frequently.
Corporate America is a cesspool of incestuous relationships and conflicts of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bingo
I could not of said it any better myself....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Ding..ding.. ding nominated thread
Corporatism is revealed

President Eisenhower warned:

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced corporate power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Corporations must die!
I'm serious. Here are these *things* that claim all the rights of meat people, yet can be immortal, and are *required* to have no morals other than the bottom line. (Remeber when Henry Ford wanted to raise workers' wages and was shot down?)

They are sharks that need to be kept under control of the *real* people. Which is not happening now, and has not been for some time.

This is the root of *all* the current trouble, IMHO. The only reason I think paper ballots hand counted is the most important issue right now is that if we can't get our votes counted we can't get people in office who will rein in the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. You couldn't be more right. I've said for a long time:


"Living with corporations is like swimming with sharks.

You want to keep a good eye on them.

And you need to be able to kill them when they turn on you.

Which they will. It's just their nature."


Look HERE for the full text of Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific, and a pretty good explanation of how 'corporate person hood' falsely became law. And a really interesting question regarding the contradiction of a legal person being owned by other legal persons. Which is slavery.

The Political Corporate Model as practiced today has turned me from a person who has owned small businesses and family corporations to the social democrat model of the Scandinavian countries. It just seems so much more fair to everyone. Let the capitalist own the means of small production, while the commons own those facilities that are necessary for all to live comfortably. No one NEEDS and automobile - except for here in the Consuming States of America - but everyone NEEDS power, water, etc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Been wondering about that,
not really a surprise that several of the usual suspects are behind it.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. this phenomenon is called "interlocking directorates" and . . .
it's been going on since the inception of capitalism . . . I had a friend who wrote a very scholarly book on interelocking directorates, I think in about 1968 or so . . . his search for a publisher was fruitless, though, and it never made it to your local library . . . I did have a chance to read it, and even then the overlapping roles of America's elite was breathtaking in its scope . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Any way to get our hands on your friends book?
I'd buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. probably not . . . lost touch with him years ago, and . . .
several net searches turned up nothing . . . actually, I'd like to read it again myself . . . as I recall, he included some really interesting charts that helped in visualizing the scope of incestuous capitalism in this country . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. UPDATE: 911 series associated with purge of Sen. Mitchell as Dis Chairman
Apparently, whoever authorized the post-production go-ahed of The Path to 9/11 is associated with the new Dis management team.

The current Disney Chairman, fmr. Sen. Mitchell, is on the way out, and will be replaced by the former head of Proctor & Gamble as Chair.

There is some speculation that the 9/11 mini-series is tied in with management shakeup. By measures such as campaign contributions, Disney has been a relatively Blue company. It also has some alarming aspects, such as the fact that one of its present Board Members also directed Halliburton until recently (he's still shown on the Disney website as a Halliburton Director), and the Disney Board is still interlocked with Boeing, a major defense contractor, and Edison Electric, a large energy company.

For details, see: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/8/133548/0301
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And this is the reason P2 9--11 is shown with no commercials
Once he begins, fact and fiction disappear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. The "Boards" is a big UNTOLD story......
http://www.theyrule.net/

someone should make a Boardwatch site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. nicely done
The link to them has been part of my signature for some time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Holy cow! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yep. The US is a corporatacracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockstone Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mickey Mouse has been traded in for
Mickey Pig!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. That Scum newscorp hiring Viet Dinh is a surprise. He's pretty young
to be on a Board like that. hmmmmm.....he was owed A LOT...to get on GE Board.

Thanks for that info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Thank you!
This is extremely important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. I wondered what had happened to Viet Dinh-9/11 is not Patriot day kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. CNN Time-Warner One of the top donors to the republican party in the world
Edited on Mon Sep-11-06 01:09 PM by LaPera
CNN Time-Warner gives more to the republican party than any of the other four networks you mentioned.

http://www.boycottbush.net/consumers.htm

How could you possibly leave out CNN Time-Warner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Scary!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC