Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Setting the Record Straight: Detainees Will Not Receive POW Status

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:54 PM
Original message
Setting the Record Straight: Detainees Will Not Receive POW Status
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060906-7.html
Some Reports Claim "High-Value Detainees Will Be Given Prisoner-Of-War Status."

But Neither The President's Proposed Legislation Nor The Detainees' Transfer To Guantanamo Gives The Detainees POW Status

* The President's Legislation Specifically Authorizes The Creation Of Military Commissions To Try These Suspected Terrorists For War Crimes. The Bill ensures that these commissions are established in a way that protects our national security and ensures a full and fair trial for the accused.

* Detainees Have Been Transferred To The Custody Of The Department Of Defense, At The U.S. Naval Base At Guantanamo Bay.

* Neither The President's Proposed Legislation Nor The Detainees' Transfer To Guantanamo Gives The Detainees POW Status.


"Some" reports, right. No POW status for prisoners because we are not at war? We are just at Terror?

In case you have missed them, here is link to the rest of the Setting the Record Straight White House whining propraganda information. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/setting-record-straight/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that the same excuse Vietnam used to torture Americans?
Isn't that a rhetorical question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, but we are the good guys so it is all ok. See?
I heard a report on radio about the tribunals (don't let accused know what info is used to convict them) and a question along the lines of would it be ok for other countries to do this, response from some Repub person (sorry, wasn't paying attention well) said no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC