Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Qaeda waited for Clinton to leave office to attack the U.S.A....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:29 PM
Original message
Al Qaeda waited for Clinton to leave office to attack the U.S.A....
The previous attack on the WTC had failed. The Millenium Plot had been foiled. They were being chased around the globe by President Clinton's anti-terrorist team. Cruise missiles were launched toward bin Laden. More were ready to go when intelligence became available.

But after the 2000 appointment of George Bush, the pressure was off. Osama knew this was the time to ramp up and execute his most audacious plan. His agents were ignored by the Bush administration. George Bush was almost given the seat numbers and flights--the memo was titled, "Bin Laden determined to attack the U.S." and hijacking planes was specifically mentioned. but George just said it was CYA stuff on the part of the CIA.

You all know the rest of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. They waited for a wimp and they got one with Little Lord Pissypants
Bush was stupid, wimpy, and incompetent. Everything al qaeda dreamed of and waited for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "They waited for a wimp" - Brilliant. Catchy, memeworthy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. So THATs what "W" stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. YOU CANNOT GO AFTER TERRORISTS, YOU'RE DEALING WITH
for oil and gas pipelines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think they were "waiting on a friend" [tm Stones].
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thats a very important point
thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep -- and, true to form, Chimpy ramped DOWN pressure on Saudis ...
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 03:39 PM by LSparkle
It didn't matter how many warnings Clinton's people gave them, the BFEE were bound and determined to make sure the heat was off their "dear friends" the Saudis once they were back in D.C. Clinton could have recommended attacking after the attack on the USS Cole, but do you think the BFEE would have done that? No fucking way!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. One might think that they knew bush would let it happen
My favorite line to piss off a "conservative":

"There would not have been a terrorist attack on September 11th if Clinton, Gore, or Kerry had been president because those men did not need a terrorist attack."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bin Laden's personal grudge against the Bush family was
amplified once Junior came into office (the grudge regarding the military bases in Saudi Arabia put there by Senior). In a sick, twisted circle, 9/11 then allowed Junior to pursue his own personal grudge against Saddam by a complete manipulation of the facts, countless thousands of civilian deaths be damned...ain't life grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm confused.
If Bin Ladan was holding a grudge,then why did *jr fly his family out of the states after 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The"Offical Story" is that Osama was completely estranged; the
ultimate "black sheep" within the Bin Laden family. Therefore, according to all of the Bush apologists, we should have no worries about the 30+ years of business dealings between the Bush and Bin Laden families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Since the bin Ladens have never legally disowned Usama
he is still a family member and therefore untouchable.

That's one of the reasons why the DOD let Usama leave Tora Bora. Special Forces from Fort Bragg had him surrounded and the brass told them to stand down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Sounds about right.
Blood is thicker than water. I heard that the family still leant him money (to the tune of $50 million after he had become a terrorist. Of course that's just pocket change to them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smitty Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is true if you ignore the Khobar Tower bombing,
the bombings of the American embassies in Africa and the USS Cole bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They knew the Cole bombing would get hung up in transition.
When did the embassy bombings happen? I can't remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smitty Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. The Khobar Towers were bombed in 1996, the embassies in1998
and the USS Cole in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Thank you.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Good observation, smitty
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 03:51 PM by liam_laddie
Has OBL been directly connected to these incidents? i assume so, but can't recall
any details from press stories at the time. Were these guys free-lancers or part of
the A'Q "team?" I do recall that the Saudi's did not co-operate at ALL with our investigation
of Khobar. Why? Easy to guess, the Wahabbi's don't want ANY snooping around...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smitty Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Speculation is that Khobar Towers was an Iranian job
But the embassies and the Cole were AQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Those bombings were nothing compared to 9/11
They knew Bush would just politicize it and grind his own axes. Clinton would have been forced to eliminate Al Quiada to save his neck. He could not use it for his own party's gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schmuls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. trying to figure out what CYA means...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Cover yer ass - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Cover your posterior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. The VERY BEST statement I've ever heard about this. There is alway somebo
somebody who can say things the way they should be said - and boy, did you ever hit the nail on the head.

This needs to be sent to every talking head and our representatives:

"Al Qaeda waited for Clinton to leave office to attack the U.S.A"

Perfect answer to all the stupid Republican remarks on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. And Bush was pResident for 234 on 9/11 - plenty of time to "take charge"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teamster633 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. 234 days would be plenty of time for nearly anyone else to take
charge. Chimpolini wasn't then and still isn't. This presidentin' gig is just one more failure to add to the resume. At least he's consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. I've thought this for the longest time.
Yes, the WTC and the Cole were attacked under Clinton's watch, but as you said, Clinton had people chasing Bin Laden and his pals all over the place. But when Bush got into office --- well, we all know that the Bush's and the Bin Laden's have been in bed together for years. Bin Laden probably knows what an idiot Bush is, so hey, with him in office, it's a much better time to pull off the second, and worst, WTC attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. I said it on another thread - if the Repukes could have proven it was
Clinton's fault, they would have started an investigation into what happened ON 9/12/2001 ... and Bush and Cheney would have provided all the documentation ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. Clinton had only one terrorist attack on American soil and it
happen only two months into his first term! Did President Clinton blame the previous administration? HELL NO, he stood tall like a man and went after the terrorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. OBL knew the Bushes were incompetent and corrupt.
He had worked with them back in the Soviet days and knew how bad they were. He knew that if al Qaeda hit the jackpot and the Bushes could capitalize on it they would cut a deal to keep the terror thing going. Anything to gain more power.

I see a docudrama taking shape here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC