Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poor hit hardest by dearer oil (rising gas prices)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:15 AM
Original message
Poor hit hardest by dearer oil (rising gas prices)
<snip>
.
This is said to be because of things such as rising school fees, council tax and energy prices. As richer people have bigger houses and cars, the argument goes, so they suffer more from the rise in petrol, gas and electricity prices.

But a study by John Hawksworth, the chief economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, shows that the rise in general inflation caused by oil prices has primarily affected the poorest third of the population because they spend a greater proportion of their income on energy than the better off.
.
<snip>


http://money.guardian.co.uk/utilities/story/0,,1866448,00.html

Rising energy prices, as energy supply is privatized, are not seen as regressive taxes, but were they
not privatized, (as it sort of the truth of the matter given the massive public subsidies), then a
deliberate regressive tax has been applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. The EPA and the oil companies teamed up
to drive out the Independents..
Several years ago the EPA went around in every state and told the Independent gas station owner that their storage tanks needed to be upgraded. In some cases those storage tanks were new but yet didn't meet the EPA specs..The cost to upgrade was astronomical...Many stations closed..then along came the big oil companies,took over those independent stations and in many cases were able to get a wavier or a least an extension of time to replace those tanks.(EPA Standards were relaxed under Bush)Many of those original tanks are still in use but this scheme by the EPA/Big Oil was the last hurdle for Big Oil companies to take total control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who benefits?
Oil and Defense CEOs Pocket the Spoils

CEOs in the defense and oil industries have been able to translate war and rising oil prices into personal jackpots, according to a new report from the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy, Executive Excess 2006.

OIL BARONS: With Americans now paying over $3 per gallon, petroleum profiteers are raking in nearly three times the pay of CEOs in comparably sized businesses. In 2005, the top 15 U.S. oil CEOs got a 50% raise since 2004. They now average $32.7 million, compared with $11.6 million for all CEOs of large U.S. firms.

Executive pay at U.S.-based oil companies also far outpaced pay at oil companies based outside the United States. BP and Royal Dutch Shell paid their CEOs only one-eighth what their U.S. counterparts collected — just $5.6 and $4.1 million in 2005, respectively — even though both companies operate in the same global marketplace as their U.S.-based competitors.

CEO William Greehey of Valero Energy took home the oil industry’s biggest executive pay rewards in 2005, pocketing $95.2 million. The average construction worker at an energy company would have to work 4,279 years to equal what Greehey collected last year.

http://www.faireconomy.org/EE06

Through various "costs" the American people are the most heavily taxed folks around especially when compared to median income. Much of this goes into corporate subsidy programs and of course the War Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. they say not to attribute..
.to malice what can be otherwise explained by stupidity; occams razor and all.

But the stupid coincidence that a wealthy barony has been uplifted on the backs of pushing
a few million serfs downwards, a new wealth tax gifted the dukes a land fife each shall
be parcelled out by order of the king, the emperor grants 1000 households worth of land and
1000 Cows.. taken each away from a serf. They've virtualized the old physical feudal system
of grants and tax levys, hiring private thugs to enforce the new private baronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You've
a nice way with words expressing precisely in a few words the condition of our condition.

They've virtualized the old physical feudal system
of grants and tax levys, hiring private thugs to enforce the new private baronies.


Not a fan of Occam's Razor theory. If these folks who are ruling us are so stupid why can't we outsmart them? And either way the key components are viciousness, guile and drive to power.

Albert Einstein says:
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."

"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ok so its malice
Then the gloves of opposition are off.

welcome to DU. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. people are up in arms about 'obvous' regressive taxes
but when a not-obvious one is flashed in their faces,
they miss it for what it is, and let it fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wealth inequality is vast and growing
Wealth inequality is vast and growing

by Sylvia Allegretto with research assistance from Rob Gray

The 10th edition of The State of Working America will be released on Labor Day weekend. This biennial publication presents a comprehensive and historical analysis of the living standards of Americans. A recurring theme, which became more pronounced with this edition, is increasing inequality. Inequality in the United States is on the rise, whether measured in terms of wages, family incomes, or wealth and is much higher than that of other advanced countries.



The figure is one such measure of inequality—the ratio of the wealth of the richest 1% to that of a household with typical wealth in the middle. As the figure indicates, wealth inequality has not only persisted, but also grown much larger over time. The richest 1% of wealth holders had 125 times the wealth of the typical household in 1962; by 2004 they had 190 times as much or $14.8 million in wealth for the upper 1% compared to just $82,000 for the household in the middle fifth of wealth.

http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snapshots_20060823
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC