What's on Part II of "Path to 9/11"?

[bklyncowgirl]

Has actually seen and commented on Part II?

Part I focuses on the Clinton administration. Part II should focus on the Bush administration. Will we see, for example, Ascroft saying he doesn't want to hear anything more about terror or Bush glancing at the notorious "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the United States" memo and than snapping at the unfortunate CIA briefer "Well now that you've covered your ass?". Will we see Cheney & Rumsfeld plotting in the background to find an excuse--a new Pearl Harbor--so to speak--get the public to support an invasion of Iraq.

Somehow I doubt it--you don't give something that criticizes Republicans to Rush Limbaugh to promote. Too bad. A "plague on both their houses" sort of drama might bring more truth into the discussion than a purely partisan hack job like this appears to be.

[kurth]

1. Part II shows how Glorious Leader saves America, vanquishes her enemies

and protects her from terrorist attacks, unlike Failed Leader in Part I. Glorious Leader is declared Protector and Ruler of all Christendom, and is obeyed by all.

Part III shows the Rapture where Glorious Leader ascends into Heaven, first-class. His subjects are then boarded by row. Democrats and Islamofascists are left behind by Homeland Security, and there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

[meegbear]

2. Here's a link with a rundown of both parts of the miniseries ...

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003087654

[Lerkfish]

3. reading that, its even MORE of a clinton smear than previously thought

and omitting the pet goat episode is downright revisionist, on top of everything else

good god, don't we have propaganda laws?

we need to research and nail the funders of this project.

[bklyncowgirl]

5. Thanks

They sure played up the most damaging--yet unverfied--allegations about Clinton and played down or eliminated the most damaging documented facts regarding Bush.

This is a right wing hatchet job and everybody should know it.

[chat_noir]

4. "if it's so easy"

quote from C&L comments

This is ridiculous. The argument here--probably spurious--is that 9/11 was Clinton's fault because he didn't get bin Laden?

Fine. Let's have fun and stipulate that.

Then let's say to these idiot right wingers and, heck, to Bush himself...if it's so easy, why haven't you done it? If it's supposed to be so goddamn easy to get the guy that Clinton had several opportunities, why hasn't Bush gotten him? With exponentially more resources brought to bear on the issue of getting him, Bush has still failed at this. Failed failed failed.

So get off of Clinton's back, you morons.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/crooks/100110077#1278249