Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq, US to sign military handover pact on September 7...first step.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 01:20 AM
Original message
Iraq, US to sign military handover pact on September 7...first step.
toward leaving? What does this mean, is it show, is it real?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060906/wl_mideast_afp/iraqsecurityus_060906155239

"Iraq and the US military will sign a delayed accord under which coalition forces will hand command of Iraqi armed forces to the government, according to a spokesman for the Iraqi premier.

"The accord will be signed tomorrow in the presence of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and General George Casey," the head of the coalition forces in Iraq, Ali al-Dabaqh said Wednesday.

The agreement was initially to be signed on Saturday, but the handover ceremony was abruptly cancelled after disagreements on the Iraqi side over who should sign the handover on the government's behalf.

Dabaqh said Maliki will name a senior official to sign the agreement, but did not reveal who this would be.

The accord means setting up a Iraqi joint military command for the army, navy and air force, which will gradually take full operational control of Iraq's armed forces, including 115,000 US-trained ground troops."

Interesting.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. In my opinion this is a last ditch effort
To try and save the "Iraqi" government. With the country degenerating into a perpetual state of civil war they have to appear to be trying to take control away from the americans and be making progress to-wards removing them. Clearly the notion of american forces keeping the peace is completely blown out of the water at this point.

It appears to me as an attempt to calm the waters.

I hope it works.

I doubt it is shrubs idea. His line is stay the course. Or maybe thats why we have been hearing the recent spat of "adapting to conditions on the ground" perhaps they were trying to lay the groundwork for cover for this knowing it was coming.

Again I hope it works the situation there is clearly untenable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Again? I thought this happened already...
...I remember some kind of handover ritual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like another meaningless gesture.
"will gradually take full operational control of Iraq's armed forces" No definition of "gradually".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Air Force?" - what. - a few Cessnas to fight the USA's stealth bombers?
.
.
.

And them murderous Warthogs?

Give them some ultra-lites to protect themselves.

And Navy? - Does Iraq even have a naval force anymore?

Oh wait,

Maybe we can help them out with our new Stealthy Canuk Coastal Defense Impovement Fleet






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. which will gradually take full operational control of Iraq's armed forces
means nothing until full operation control actually occurs... IMO - it's just window dressing to give the appearance of progress...moving forward..yadda..yadda..yadda..

The agreement was initially to be signed on Saturday, but the handover ceremony was abruptly cancelled after disagreements on the Iraqi side over who should sign the handover on the government's behalf.

if they can't decide who would sign it, then how the hell are they going to decide who will run it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC