Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are they finally going to put Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:16 PM
Original message
Are they finally going to put Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
on trial now? He is after all the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 plot. I'd like to hear, and I think the American people have the right to hear, what evidence the U.S. Government has against him.

What did the CIA interrogation tactics (not torture by the way--HAH) reveal? That certainly might put many unanswered questions to rest and make us crazy conspiracy theorists go away for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have they finished rearranging his memories yet?
He's one of several likely candidates for double-agent status. So is Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, who was also captured in Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. He will never get a real trial. They are cooking up some kind of
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 06:42 PM by The_Casual_Observer
military tribunal thing, no doubt because they don't have any evidence that would hold water in a legitimate legal proceeding. It's like the dirty bomb guy, when they held their feet to the fire, the AG folded & they changed all the charges & now the whole thing has gone silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He will probably have a "fatal heart attack"
before he is ever brought to trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's unlikely most of the evidence against him, making
the assumption they have some, wouldn't be admissible. Chain of custody, unavailability of witnesses, self-incrimination, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think the CIA want it known where he was between 2001 and 2003.
It would be a bit inconvenient if the US public found out about Pakistani intel's collusion with the alleged 911 mastermind and about the probable CIA/FBI knowledge of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC