Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why should Clinton have been concerned about OBL BEFORE 911 if Bush isn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:37 PM
Original message
Why should Clinton have been concerned about OBL BEFORE 911 if Bush isn't
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 05:38 PM by gully
"that concerned about him" AFTER?!

I know that Clinton did what he could on capturing OBL and this latest ABC flick is bunk. BUT, this is a question that the RW-ers who blame Clinton for "not doing enough" should be asked, no?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/101504W.shtml

"Six months after he said Osama bin Laden must be caught dead or alive, this president was asked, 'Where's Osama bin Laden?' " Kerry said. "He said, 'I don't know. I don't really think about him very much. I'm not that concerned.' We need a president who stays deadly focused on the real war on terror."

~

And, again, I don't know where he is," Bush said during the 2002 news conference. "I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run.
~ George W. Bush

Correction George, OBL WAS on the run when Bill Clinton was President, he is now sitting cozilly in the mountains of Pakistan being treated well by so called "uncooperative governments." And our pResident is ahhh "not concerned."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. All you have to ask the Repugs
...is if they were so goddamned interested in fighting terrorism during Clinton's presidency, why didn't they approve of expanding wiretapping laws as laid out in his proposal to Congress in '96?

And in case they don't know the answer, tell them that at the time the Repubs were more concerned about our liberties and feared giving Clinton more aggressive wiretapping abilities would create a police state.

Oh, the irony!!

According to the standards they so vehemently push today, the Republicans FAILED THIS COUNTRY in the 90s.

They're hypocrites. As usual. And trying to blame Clinton for their abominable string of failures is a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. That can't be right
DU says Kerry didn't go after Bush on bin laden and Tora Bora.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You have a link to that?
:shrug: I never heard DU say any such thing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was concerned. Why bin Laden was # 1 on the CIA hit list. Leslie
Stalle did a story on it on 60 Minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I know he was.
I tried to make that clear in my op.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Just in case you needed proof....
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC