BREAKING: BUSH TO ABIDE BY RULE OF LAW
Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 12:59 PM
Original message
BREAKING: BUSH TO ABIDE BY RULE OF LAW
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does this mean we were breaking international law?...n/t
Finder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Original message
verse18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. So sad that this is truly breaking news. nt
skiddlybop
(408 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Just like the signing statements, he'll say one thing for public image and do another.
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which Means He Has Broken the Law
He should be tried as well.
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. At first I thought this was a badly-timed April Fools joke.
Then I thought, "Well, maybe the Onion." OK--convince me it's not the Onion.
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, lots of work now for ACLU lawyers
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Time to scrape up another contribution to the ACLU.
They're at the VERY TOP of my list.
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. That means he's going to resign, turn the admin over to Kerry...
then fly to Baghdad to stand trial next to Saddam, right?
insane_cratic_gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Since when? He's never followed it before
Or do you mean, The law as he writes it you mean? those little foot notes he keeps writing in .. the law as he interprets it
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. "New" laws. "His" laws. "His" proposed legislation.
More lies, more spin, more bullshit.
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The "out of control" judiciary told him he was breaking the law...
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 01:40 PM by Junkdrawer
so he simply will have the Republican congress rewrite said laws. And you thought we weren't a nation of laws.... BTW: The Corporate media will cover his asking for new legislation. The breaking the current law thingy was eclipsed by the Karr/Ramsey orgy. Priorities you know.
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Sep-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "Activist" bad, "REactivist" good, it seems.
Appalling. Fucking appalling. The SCOTUS didn't go NEARLY far enough and this bastard makes a big deal of it.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.