Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our government is running ALL the mainstream media now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:17 AM
Original message
Our government is running ALL the mainstream media now.
All of it, with very few exceptions, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, and many many others nationally and internationally.

I don't claim to be the discoverer of this breaking news, its just absolutely stunning how quickly it happened. Just as Orwell and others predicted. Hitler would have loved television, it is the number one instrument of mass mind control ever.

Every major news outlet has been acclimated, absorbed, assimilated and sabotaged by the white house machine.

My jaw is permanently dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. THE BIG TEN. Ever see this chart? And it's and old one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. That's a great link, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish you'd posted "this administration" rather than "our government."
To me, the government is still full of civil servants who do a good job and seek to carry out the policies that We the People have approved. Bush's masters have hijacked the Executive Branch, and the Congress has been taken over by corporate lobbies, but I think the government can be saved.

These "news" media are full of otherwise intelligent people who have lost their way in a world of personal economic temptations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Ssshhh!
If you let the Republicans know there are still good conscientious civil servants out there, they'll go after them and take them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cygnusx2112 Donating Member (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. While I completely understand what you're saying...
...and might agree to a point...

I wonder how someone like Olbermann figures into this equation.

Along with sinking Fox ratings numbers and (I can assume) rising Olbermann ratings numbers. And if indeed they are rising in that time slot, wouldn't tv executives want to put on MORE shows like his?

How does someone like Olbermann stay on the air with such biting and incisive critiques of this administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Look what happen to Phil Donahue who had popular ratings
but got canned, he had higher ratings than all other programs on the same network that were not canned.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0227-04.htm

Welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cygnusx2112 Donating Member (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for the welcome (I've been lurking for years...)
Do you think we can expect a canning of Olbermann soon?



If the PTB are "influencing" media:

1. How does Olbermann stay on?
1a. Do you think his bosses attempt to steer him a certain way?
2. Why doesn't CNN attempt to replicate his success with a like minded news personality instead of the idiots they trot out (Grace, Beck)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I know that this is heresy but, no, our govermnet is NOT running all media
They aren't running all mainstream media. The conservatoids certainly have the advantage right now, but to claim that they run it all, is, well, not accurate.

I apologize if expressing this opinion offends anybody.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cygnusx2112 Donating Member (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe running isn't the word...
...how about influencing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Influencing is accurate - and would be even if they weren't doing anything
shady. Both parties do their best to influence the media - as do unions, churches, iterest groups, private figures and so on.

That said, the Republicans are clearly winning the media balance, in part because reporters are lazy and stupid, and they know how to capitalize on that. Also editors and media owners are big businesses and so will tend to make the news a bit more conservative when it comes to economic news.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. In 1942 the New York Times reported
that Prescott Bush's Union Bank had been authorized to change it's address of record. They failed to mention the new address was the US Government enemy properties manager, or that five Bush controlled operations had been siezed by Congress for connections to Nazi Germany.

This ain't new, it's just becoming more blatant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. according to bush
the terrorists are running the media...

what's the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. That doesn't explain the way they covered Clinton while
he was President. They parrotted every GOP talking point; called everything he did ____-gate (and of course "gate" means Impeachable offense). They avoided using the phrase "the President" and "President Clinton" -- instead calling him Mister Clinton. Newsweek wrote the book "True Colors" then lied about who "anonymous" then admitted it was them afterall.

So I don't see this as a recent development and it isn't the government (assuming Clinton was the government at the time they assailed him) that is controlling the bias and framing, what they over-cover and what they ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC