if osama = adolf and mein kampf = bin-laden's plans, then

[nosmokes]

isn't it bushco that is actually ignoring the" new nazi threat." wasn't it bushco that was served up a PDB that was titled bin-laden determined to strike inside US or something similiar? and wasn't it days later that planes were flown into the twin towers, the pentagon a pennsylvania field?

i'm just fucking curious as to who is ignoring what here. perhaps someone can enlighten me?

[LSK]

1. Randi Rhodes said today:

They are not appeasers, they are impersonators.

[C_U_L8R]

2. Perhaps neither appeasing nor impersonating

but utterly incompetent

(or all three... for the trifecta)

[Rabrrrrrr]

3. And Buscho = Roosevelt, except a bizarro world Roosevelt

that reacts to the world situation by sending all of our troops to, metaphorically speaking, Neville Chamberlain.

[Ready4Change]

4. And wasting resources in Iraq...

Rather than going after the true enemy?

It's like FDR and Churchill launching a full scale assault on Australia.

[dflprincess]

5. Personally, I think Mein Kampf comes closer to the PNAC

document "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" (think "new Pearl Harbor")

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

[nosmokes]

6. well sure, in real reality. but in whatever mythical world bushco is in

where we're all appeasers if we don't agree w/him and his strategy (or lack thereof) in this pseudo war on terror that's the new party line, whoops - talking point.