Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Slaughter Calls for ABC to Come Clean on New 9-11 Docudrama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:25 PM
Original message
Rep. Slaughter Calls for ABC to Come Clean on New 9-11 Docudrama
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 01:26 PM by kpete
Slaughter Calls for ABC to Come Clean on New 9-11 Docudrama
Divisive and Politicized Accounts of September 11th Attacks and National Security Issues Endanger Nation


Washington, DC - Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (D-NY-28), Ranking Member of the House Rules Committee, today called for ABC to make clear to viewers that its upcoming television mini-series The Path to 9/11 is not a documentary account of the events and political decisions that preceded the terrorist attacks of that day.



"ABC has a responsibility to make clear that this film is not a documentary, and does not represent an official account of the facts surrounding the September 11th attacks," Rep. Slaughter said. "Disclaimers noting that The Path to 9/11 is a docudrama should be shown throughout its airing. We have yet to establish the impartiality and accuracy of the people behind this film and the claims it advances, and the American people need to know that."



Rep. Slaughter also expressed concern over the timing of the mini-series, as well as recent Republican rhetoric on the issue of national security and its connection to the war in Iraq.



"But what is far more important is the timing of this movie," Rep. Slaughter continued. "The anniversary of the attacks is an emotional time, and it is wrong for anyone to play on those emotions and use them to advance a political agenda."

much, much more at:
http://www.louise.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=679&Itemid=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right on! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. rec #2! All elected Dems should be up in arms over this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. but, as usual, they won't be
(i guess my glass if half empty tonight)

people will watch this and take it for the truth/fact

"if it was on tv it's gotta be true"

(gezzz):banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Way to go Slaughter
ABC can show the movie all they want IMO .
My only problem with it is the label
documentary when it is simply a movie .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeChaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Recommended n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Richard Clarke quotes in related DU posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. At what point do you slip (leap?!?) from "docudrama"....
.... to outright fiction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, if the NYT can pass on reporting Bush's illegal wiretaps
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 01:45 PM by Marr
until after the election because it might "influence the outcome", I don't see why ABC can't delay this piece of baseless propaganda for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. the GOP media is a one way street only in favor of the pukes
These actions have yet to be balanced fair or equal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Exactly. It's past time the Dem PARTY targets corpmedia as complicit
with the GOPs since 1997. It's only getting WORSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Except they're all corporatewhores so
that would make the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great news! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just called and thanked her... and informed Pelosi.
How long will they be allowed to lie with impunity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't like "docu"drama, either. This thing should have "docu" nowhere
near it's description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. It should be called what it is, a fantasy
Karl Rove's fantasy at that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Propudrama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. Exactly!! Most would think "Docu" is accurate... it is NOT.
This is not Farenheit 9/11 which was factually accurate. This ABC docudrama is a series of major lies on critical matters and points in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. KICK!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. I prefer the term "Crapumentory"...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. HA! perfect word for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. K. & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wish her staff would clean up the numerous font problems in that page
Looks amateurish but the information is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I want to know why the hell did Harvey Keitel do the movie
I have lost all respect for him. The guy is a talented actor who doesn't have to worry about when the next script comes along. His connections with Scoresse, Tarrintino and DeNiro could keep him employed until his death bed.

So why the hell is he doing this crapudrama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. We should be demanding equal time
to expose the failures of the GOP which allowed 9/11 to happen:

- distracting the public from important national security issues to follow the innumerable false "scandals" they tried to smear Clinton with, the worst of which was "Monicagate"

- failing to enact necessary anti-terror legislation proposed by Clinton in 1996, 1997, 1998 & 1999.

- appointing a President with direct personal & financial ties to the bin Laden family & al Queda.

- once in office, Bush ignored Clinton initiatives bringing peace to the Israel-Palestine conflict, ignored Clinton initiatives to track international financial transactions for terrorist organizations, and shifted focus for the intelligence community from al Queda to Iraq.

- Bush ignored the warnings of Richard Clarke, then demoted & finally fired him - all for doing his job. Unfortunately his job conflicted with the POLITICAL aspirations of the Bush administration.

- dozens counter-terrorism officials and experts in a host of other federal government agencies, from the FBI to the CIA to the NSA, all suffered a fate similar to Clarke's: trying to draw the attention of the Bush admin to the threat posed by terrorism in general and al Queda in particular, only to be ignored, marginalized, fired - and in some cases charged with crimes - simply for the political gain of the GOP.

- after 9/11, the admin implemented a massive cover-up of what lead up to the attacks, suppressing any questions of WHY the attacks occurred, WHY our intelligence failed, and WHY the admin ignored the specific warnings that it received.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Equal Time
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 09:07 PM by Oldtimeralso
It Died in 1983 under RayGun's watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Boycott Disney (ABC's Owner)?
Boycott or no? Poll here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. I will be voicing my issues with Disney asap...!
I urge anyone else that is upset about this to do the same. Do I need to remind you all of the way they dumped Michael Moore's documentary F 9/11. F 9/11 was a true documentary and they wanted nothing to do with it. How dare they green-light a fictional film and call it a docudrama?!

I'm beyond pissed!

Off to get some info. for the board. See you all later...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
49. Disney does not give a RAT'S ass.
Pun intended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. "docudrama" ??? The disclaimer should say "entirely fictional"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. CALL THE ADVERTISERS!
Is there a way to find out who is sponsoring this show? The MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO PROTEST anything on television is to target the sponsors -- the advertisers. Being in advertising for over 20 years, I've seen where even one or two letters can change the influence of an ad strategy or media buy. Write the brand managers -- they hate any negative publicity surrounding their product/service. They wield incredible power over the networks and their programming. This goes for those clowns who buy time on FOX as well. Call! Write! E-mail! Complain! Tell them you will not buy their product. YOU WILL BE HEARD and IT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Welcome to DU, Winebrat...!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
41. Hi Winebrat!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. I believe they just announced there will be no advertising
it was supposed to be limited advertising and now I hear they're going commercial free.

Think I saw the info on mediamatters. I'll see if I can find the link again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Disclaimers aren't enough when actual historical figures are depicted!
My first thought was to add disclaimers, but then, how is the viewer to distinguish between fiction & actual history when actual figures (Clinton, Berger, et al) will be shown doing/saying whatever is at the moviemaker's whim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwtravel Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. I missed it? When did it play?
It must have played based on all the comments talking about its content, right?

How did the Congresswoman get a sneak peek?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. sniff, sniff
sniff, sniff, sniff.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
42. Hi jwtravel!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. it was given to a lot of right-wingers to preview
and apparently a few thinking humans got a peek too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. People don't know what docudrama means they will see 911
and think it is a true enactment.
this stinks really stinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. ABC is
the company that broadcasts Rash Limpballs in NYC. Truth isn't their strong suit. Disney is known for telling fairy tales. First it was a talking mouse. Now it's a Clinton hit piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. Not to further soil the waters as ABC has done so well, but has
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 09:17 PM by wiley
anyone else noticed ABC World News tonight has turned into an apologetic crapfest. Their response to the Iraq for Sale (Greenwald) was entirely outrageous. Does Cheney have his hand up Charlie or Charles (pick the day) Gibson's arsehole? It used to be the only news"show" I could tolerate. Are they trying to attract the old FoxNews morans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. "Bush Knew - An American Requiem"
I created this Flash exactly one year after the horror of 911 to Honor those who died at the hands of Bush. Don't forget to turn up those speakers for Mozart's "LaCrimosa" in D. It's possible a million people have seen it by now, our site Takebackthemedia.com pulled in 100 million hits in it's first year alone when we started in 2000.

Please pass THIS around so people can get the TRUTH, not the President Clinton Bashing Crap ABC plans to run.



http://www.tbtmradio.com/geeklog/public_html/staticpages/index.php?page=20040606205339801
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cannonfire Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Have you noticed...?
Not long ago, the right used to target Disney on all sorts of specious grounds. Disney was too gay...Disney was too liberal...Disney hid satanic messages in kids' movies...yada yada yada. You know the drill.

About a year ago, someone turned off the spigot. The anti-Disney smear campaign ceased.

And now this. A shlockudrama which blames Clinton for being soft on Osama.

To add insult to injury, said shlockudrama will air on teevee not long after Bush's buddies in Pakistan announced that they will do nothing to impede or arrest Osama Bin Laden. He may live free and unmolested within Pakistan's borders.

Never mind the fact that Bush once vowed to "get" Osama AND any nation which harbored him. Bush will say not one word against Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Bushitler probably made the arrangements for the Osama
stay in Pakistan. MIHOP! Exploitation of memories and emotions. They arranged that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. disney's way of saying: please don't bash gay-day
i'll help you out with your 9/11 spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Hmm. When did Farenheit 9/11 come out? Wasn't Disney
involved in that? Or, not involved in it -- they pulled money out of the project and did their best to shut it down? I ask, because if memory serves, that's when the wackjob right let up on Beauty living with the Beast out of wedlock and such.

And, you have to wonder what new threat Musharif is dancing around now. Junior must be furious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. Hi cannonfire!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
40. They need to come clean about their pro-establishment propoganda as well..
I believe they call it "the news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
48. I think this is partly a response to Lieberman's loss...
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 01:31 PM by FighttheFuture
Lieberman having his ass handed to him was a big lesson the the entrenched entitlement club of the Senate and Congress and their big money backers. Very, very big. This is now the danger point. What will they do about the netroots and the internet?

Will the Dems start embracing it by makeing the Democrat party Democratic again? Will have to eject the DLC and put the DSCC and DCCC on notice. Should be shunning Lieberman. Except for Dean and the DNC, nothing's really happened so far. Who actually controls and enforces the message of the Democratic party is stil a big internal battle.

Will the Repugs keep pushing legislations to hobble the Internet? Crack down more on dissent? Allow even more fascist (corporate) control of media? You bet. Will the Dems as a party still having a fillibuster power allow this...? So far, they have.

That ABC 9/11 Docu-lie is, I suspect, in part the gloves coming off of the corporate propoganda machine. They cannot allow the rise of true people powered politics that the Internet is bringing about. They may no longer feel comfortable with Bush, that much is obvious, but they are even less compfortable with an enegrgized, liberal progressive Democratic party (or whatever party can take that mantle). They may be starting to loose control of the Dems. I believe they would rather risk sinking the ship of state than share their place on the bridge with a real Democratic Progressive people powered politics, even as we steer into the iceberg.

This is the danger that is coming full bore at us all. This is one of the first salvo's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC