Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Adam Walsh Child Protection Safety Act of 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:46 AM
Original message
Adam Walsh Child Protection Safety Act of 2006
Your kid clicks on the website and the front page of the site shows a picture of Barney the purple dinosaur with a message reading, “Click on Barney's picture to see all of his latest adventures.”

Your kid clicks on the picture as directed — and is instantly transported to a website featuring hot XXX hardcore sex action of the most depraved sort imaginable.

If a website owner now tries that trick, it could soon land him up to 20 years in prison (assuming that he is in a place that could be subject to U.S. legal jurisdiction).

In July, Congress passed a law that makes it a federal felony for anyone to use misleading “words” or “images” that are intended to confuse a minor into viewing a sexually explicit website. It is all part of the “Adam Walsh Child Protection Safety Act of 2006” — one of the most extensive rewrites of federal laws concerning child pornography and sex offenders in several years.
---- cut

The law states, in part: “Whoever knowingly embeds words or digital images into the source code of a website with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not more than 20 years.”

This law defines the phrase “harmful to minors” as “any communication consisting of nudity, sex, or excretion, that, taken as a whole and with reference to its context-

(1) predominantly appeals to a prurient interest of minors;

(2) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole, with respect to what is suitable material for minors; and

(3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.”

http://www.tehachapinews.com/home/viewarticle.php?cat_id=389&post=20282
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this that John Walsh guy...
that's pushing this crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. it is wide open, .... but good for them. for us. for my kids. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC