Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It NEVER Happened"- Richard Clarke Blasts Key Scene In ABC 9/11 Docudrama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:44 AM
Original message
"It NEVER Happened"- Richard Clarke Blasts Key Scene In ABC 9/11 Docudrama
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 09:45 AM by kpete
Richard Clarke Blasts Key Scene In ABC’s 9/11 Docudrama

On September 10 and 11, ABC is planning to air a “docudrama” called Path to 9/11, billed by writer Cyrus Nowrasteh as “an objective telling of the events of 9/11.”

The first night of Path to 9/11 has a dramatic scene where former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger refuses to give the order to the CIA to take out bin Laden — even though CIA agents, along with the Northern Alliance, have his house surrounded. Rush Limbaugh, who refers to Nowrasteh as “a friend of mine,” reviews the action:

So the CIA, the Northern Alliance, surrounding a house where bin Laden is in Afghanistan, they’re on the verge of capturing, but they need final approval from the Clinton administration in order to proceed.

So they phoned Washington. They phoned the White House. Clinton and his senior staff refused to give authorization for the capture of bin Laden because they’re afraid of political fallout if the mission should go wrong, and if civilians were harmed…Now, the CIA agent in this is portrayed as being astonished. “Are you kidding?” He asked Berger over and over, “Is this really what you guys want?”

Berger then doesn’t answer after giving his first admonition, “You guys go in on your own. If you go in we’re not sanctioning this, we’re not approving this,” and Berger just hangs up on the agent after not answering any of his questions.


ThinkProgress has obtained a response to this scene from Richard Clarke, former counterterrorism czar for Bush I, Clinton and Bush II, and now counterterrorism advisor to ABC:

1. Contrary to the movie, no US military or CIA personnel were on the ground in Afghanistan and saw bin Laden.

2. Contrary to the movie, the head of the Northern Alliance, Masood, was no where near the alleged bin Ladin camp and did not see UBL.

3. Contrary to the movie, the CIA Director actually said that he could not recommend a strike on the camp because the information was single sourced and we would have no way to know if bin Laden was in the target area by the time a cruise missile hit it.


In short, this scene — which makes the incendiary claim that the Clinton administration passed on a surefire chance to kill or catch bin Laden — never happened. It was completely made up by Nowrasteh.

.......................

more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/05/clarke-blasts-abc/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, stop flying planes into Nowrasteh's skyscraper
or it might come a'tumbling down. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think only the comedians can counter this. Too many citizens
don't know how right wing ABC is. ABC needs to be exposed for lying - this author should be made to appear on ABC and other stations and defend himself against Clarke's version. But, that may not happen - it may take Clarke and others to get this out. Let's see what Berger will say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
72. We need to get Berger to sue for SLANDER Period
Berger AND Clinton sue the bastards at The All Bullshit Channel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. running this movie was a brilliant move by ABC
because it allows the Republicans to claim that Dems who want this pulled "are babies who can't handle the truth being exposed", and in that sense, the Republicans will gain even more credibility for their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Anymore perception really is reality. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "Running the movie" just might
backfire in abc's and the repukes' fuking face because it's going to bring up what really happened Again and Again and I don't think the fascists can handle any more truths thrown in their collective face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. oh yeah? Who is gonna get the message out?
And, if anyone anywhere gets to actually say that the movie is a bunch of RW lies, they will be countered by a Republican sycophant in the interest of giving "equal time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. What we need is one of the other outlets to run a competing show.
I don't think any of them have the gut and no idea what that show would be. But, it would split the audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. How about "Wag the Dog" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
26.  I don't know about wag the dog
But Rash Limbaugh said on his radio show today that the movie will have four brief scenes that deal with the Monica Lewinsky matter. One mentioned by Rash was Clinton's on air denial of having had sexual relations or an improper relationship with Monica. Another scene deals with Clinton's grand jury testimony on the Lewinsky matter.

Obviously, neither of those topics has anything to do with 9/11. The only link I can think of is wag the dog. My hunch is that part won't be shown in the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Very good analogy
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 01:45 PM by edwardlindy
Have a feeling that some of them out there can't connect. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. Yeah, I know what you mean but
I still am thinking it's going to backfire. I'll guess we'll see down the road a piece if that thought is "hogwash" or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. You could be right. Look at how many are condemning it
And none of us has even seen it yet.

Firedoglake has gone unhinged screaming about progressive bloggers being locked out pre-reviews because she didn't get a copy then when she tried to no one on the contact list was available. When she finally did get ahold of someone they said they would send it out Tues (today) or Wed. She made this post on Sunday saying she was trying to get this stuff on Saturday. That's right Saturday on Labor day weekend and she's shocked the PR people couldn't send her a copy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. ABC has a vested interest in protecting Disney's Saudi investors...
by covering up the truth which has been uncovered- specifically in the Canadian media:

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/interviews.html


Jean-Charles Brisard: Brisard has investigated Al Qaeda's finances for the French Intelligence Service, even before 9/11. He's followed the relationship between Osama Bin Laden and Saudi Arabia and uncovered proof that the Saudis were funding the Al Qaeda's terrorist networks long after the war with the Soviets ended and his campaign with the U.S. began. He's published a book, 'The Forbidden Truth'.

He tells us how the Saudi government has been funding the terrorists for over a decade and why.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
74. But it also means that if it is false the entire news station must resign
in disgrace?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Richard Clarke, American Hero
Too bad no one's listening. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. not sure if he is a hero
thare is a lot that we don't know about him ie. what role did he play in doing the 9/11 attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
61. Are you kidding?
Please tell me you are kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #61
71. His "defection" from the Bush administration seems false
Supposedly , he "knew" it was "al qaeda" as soon as the second tower was hit and he was trying to get the Bush administration to act on that, but no, the Bush team were trying to pin it on Iraq. He's perfect for pushing the official story by exposing what appears to be the real "cover up". Everyone will be arguing over whether Bush Co was guilty of "blaming 9-11 on Iraq" rather than wondering if they weren't involved in something even worse and of course BushCo will never be called to account for blaming it on Iraq, which is what people will think is the real issue. He let the Bush administration control the release of his book and Condi called him the "crisis manager", yet supposedly they are at odds? Nah, it's sophisticated trickery at work giving the mainstream on both sides a bone to chew on, while covering up the real problem. And if he was the crisis manager then exactly what crisis' was he managing? spin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #71
75. I agree
Clarke's position is the fashionable, politically correct position that accepts all the bullshit about the "war on terror" which is basically a huge hoax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #71
77. I am not trying to sound argumentative here, just curious
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 09:52 AM by Pawel K
do you have any real evidance that would even suggest such a thing? And what kind of involvement do you think Bush Co had in this, placing thousands of c4s all around the towers and blowing them up?

I certainly believe they saw it coming. Because of their incompetence or simply because they let it happen for political points I certainly don't doubt. But that they were complicit in it is extremely hard for me to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
64. He is the only one to admit failure during the 9/11 hearings
"we failed to prevent the attacks" or words to that effect.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #64
78. exactly. He was the only one in the admiinistration to apologize to the
victim's families. And I would argue it certainly wasn't his fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure ABC will air a rebuttal....NOT
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Only the sheep will believe this propaganda
Anyone with half a brain will see Bush has yet to capture Bin Laden and he has the full support of the country and military to do so. I would love to see Democrats play that video of Bush saying he wasn't concerned about Bin Laden. Now that would be a campaign ad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Let's hope but I think
you're being overly optimistic. I used to think that only sheep would vote for Bush the second time around and yet here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Yes, sheep voted for * but
I don't think that has any bearing on the 2004 election results. I believe those are just as fanciful as ABC's 9-11 movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Well, I think it does have some bearing
He shouldn't have had near the votes he got, even when you account for the fraud. Way too many people bought his line, hook and sinker. I don't have much confidence anymore in American's ability to differentiate propaganda from reality. I wish I did, but I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I agree with you.
Mostly.

I want to make a slight differentiation between "Americans" and "Voters." I think the majority of Americans do see through the propaganda--in fact, that's why they don't vote. They see the entire system as corrupt and so don't because they think they know their vote won't count. (This manifests itself in a number of ways, such as the electoral college system, knowing about election fraud, habitual disenfranchisement, etc.)

I'm not defending people who don't vote. I think they are abdicating their responsibilities as citizens and thus are giving assent to the wholesale slaughter of democracy by their silence. That's upward toward 60% of the voting age public!

But really, it's the voters, that percentage of citizens who hover around 40% and consistently exercise their right to vote, who seem to be having a hard time differentiating between reality and propaganda. Since the last two presidential votes seem to have been roughly 50/50 (assuming little or no cheating on the Republians' part), we're really only talking about 20% of the population being willfully delusional. And I think the reason that 20% consistently believes the pResident Evil and his Minions is that they consider themselves uber-patriotic, and as such, believe in the infallibility of government... or at least that We The People should blindly trust our leaders to have our best interests at heart.

Then there is also the media to take into effect. Those media people who support this administration, or at least who never publicly decry its evil to any real extent, or even say nothing except to talk about the celebrity or abduction of the week, are just like those non-voters, giving assent to the policies through their silence. And in any void, something must fill the space. And through Fox news and the other corporate media gatekeepers into the mix and the left never gets a fair shake at presenting their side, and the propaganda is the only loud message getting through to that 20% who blindly follow.

It's all a vicious cycle, but I really do think most people get that what they're hearing is bullshit. What they don't get is that it's up to them to save this country from going down the toilet completely. Those are the people I wish we could get through to.

/pointless rant

What was my point? Oh, right: when you're only talking about roughly 20% of the people eligible to vote voted for the asshat-in-chief, combined with Diebold and the other holders of proprietary patents, I think a case can be made for that the supposed election numbers are as fanciful as ABC's upcoming 9/11 show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. You make some good points
and I almost went back and edited that post when I read that I had written "majority of Americans" because I know that most of them don't vote at all. What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Yeah, since the fascist media
won't show any rebuttals then the Dems need to create campaign ads that show the truth in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nabia2004 Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Trouble is, there are too many sheep...
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 01:57 PM by Nabia2004
And these sheep are too busy just making it through the day to fact check, or even question what the hear and see. We need a counter-propaganda campaign to fight this BS. We need to call them on each and every lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Email ABC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisby Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. I just did.
Hope they like the smell of burning font. I think my keyboard is still on fire.

:smoke:


Lisby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. Repubs can't even keep their lies straight
what a bunch of losers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StateSecrets Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Baloney Report
http://nswbc.org/Press%20Releases/NSWBC-911Comm.htm


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE- September 5, 2006



The 9/11 Commission: A Play on Nothing in Three Acts

By Sibel Edmonds & Bill Weaver



A wag once famously said that Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot was a play where nothing happened . . . twice. The two former co-chairmen of the 9-11 commission report, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, have released a new book, "Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9-11 Commission." This book goes Beckett one better – it is the third act of veneer over substance, self-aggrandizement over serious analysis, and cliché over perspicacity. It is another calculated attempt by the former commissioners to place themselves in the media spotlight, and to overcome the humiliation of their widely criticized and mostly debunked report. It is a vapid and substanceless attempt to claim moral high ground and present the co-chairmen as heroes of honesty. It would be a farce, except that it has no story line, save the aggrandizement of the authors. At least they are consistent in doing nothing and proclaiming that to be a sign of their devotion to the country and the government. Beckett once said that “habit is the ballast that chains the dog to its vomit,” and by this measure the chain restraining Kean and Hamilton is a short one indeed.



As you recall, Act One, “The Dirty Ten Digging on 9/11,” consisted of extraordinary performances by every single member of the commission to convince us, the audience -- the gullible public -- of commission independence, and its intent to provide our nation with the truth, nothing but the whole truth; their pledge to hold the ‘culprits’ accountable, no matter how high or low on the ladder of the bureaucracy; their commitment to provide “meaningful fixes and remedies,” regardless of any resistance they may have to face.



During Act Two, the commissioners, led by their stars, Kean and Hamilton, put on the performance of their lives. They delivered a document that promised to be more than the mere sum of mortal intelligence; they promised a report that drew on the nation’s soul and would lay bare the necessity and nature of change.



Initially, this play, scripted by the very powers the commission was to investigate, was to have only two acts. However, due to gradually increasing critiques by some in the media, even some of those who originally attended the serenade chorus, and fairly loud boos from some of the previously cheering audience, the producers have now decided to add additional act(s). Act Three, the Finger-Pointing and Blame Game, stars Kean and Hamilton as two comrades holding hands during the act and directing blame at the other eight commission members, who are now cast as traitors and deceivers. The audience is led to assume that the other eight members were responsible for the now untenable report; decided to pursue practical failure but achieve popular success; traded the public welfare for personal gain.



The Commission was created and put in place due to the relentless pressure and outcry by the 9/11 family members and their public supporters who had three objectives in mind: 1) Getting all the facts; 2) Establishing Accountability for those who failed us due to their intentional or unintentional acts; 3) Provide recommendation for real fixes and meaningful remedies.



The Commission fulfilled none of those three objectives. In their responsibility to report all the facts: They either refused to interview all relevant experts and witnesses, or, they censored the reports provided to them by those with direct and first-hand information. Both these acts were selective and intentional. Contrary to their pledge to establish accountability: They refused to hold anyone accountable and lamely justified it by saying, “We don’t want to point a finger at anyone.” All those responsible individuals remained in their positions or were even promoted. And as far as meaningful remedies and reforms are concerned, the commission threw in senseless, and in some cases, detrimental cosmetic and bureaucratic “solutions” that ended up making our government even more cumbersome and unable to respond to threats to national security. In the name of solutions and reforms, they forced down our throats exactly what led to the failure to protect our nation on 9/11: A highly bureaucratic, complicated, inefficient mammoth of a malfunctioning machine.



On the Fifth anniversary of the September Eleven Terror Attacks, we, the National Security Whistleblowers, want to go on record one more time to reiterate the significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the 9/11 commission by those of us from the Intelligence, Aviation, and Law Enforcement communities, but ended up being censored and omitted. The failure to address such serious and relevant issues, witnesses, and information renders the report flawed and the commissioners parties to a fraud on the nation.



The following Veteran National Security experts were turned away, ignored, or censored by the 9/11 Commission, even though they had direct and relevant information related to the Commission’s investigation (for the PDF version Click Here):



John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI - Mr. Cole worked for 18 years in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division as an Intelligence Operations specialist, and was in charge of FBI’s foreign intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Mr. Cole had knowledge of certain activities that directly related to the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He notified the 9/11 Commission during its investigation, but never received a response. His name and contact information was provided to the Commission as a key witness by other witnesses, but he was never contacted or interviewed.



John Vincent, Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Vincent worked for the FBI for 27 1/2 years before retiring in 2002. He worked his last 8 years in counterterrorism in the FBI’s Chicago Field Office. Mr. Vincent, along with Robert Wright, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases, and certain warnings they had tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Although he was granted an interview, the commissioners’ investigators refused to let him provide them with information related to his case and the 9/11 terrorists network; they insisted on limiting the interview to only administrative and irrelevant questions and issues.



Robert Wright, Veteran Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Wright is a veteran special agent in the FBI Chicago Field Office Counterterrorism Unit. He had been investigating a suspected terrorist cell for three years, when he was informed in January 2001 that the case was being closed. Agent Wright, along with Mr. Vincent, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases and certain warnings they’d tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Three months before September 11, Wright wrote a stinging internal memo charging that the FBI was not interested in thwarting a terrorist attack, but rather "was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred." The FBI refused to allow Wright to testify before the 9/11 Commission, however, the Commission did not insist or attempt to subpoena Wright; despite the fact that it had subpoena power.



Sibel Edmonds, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Ms. Edmonds worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Turkey, Iran, and Turkic speaking Central Asian countries. She contacted the 9/11 Commission in May 2003 and requested a meeting to provide them with information directly related to the terrorist attack. The Commission investigators refused to meet with Edmonds and informed her that due to their limited resources and time they were not going to interview all witnesses. She was able to provide the commission with information and documents only after certain 9/11 family members intervened directly. Ms. Edmonds’ testimony was completely censored by the Commission.



Behrooz Sarshar, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Mr. Sarshar worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing Farsi translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Iran and Afghanistan. He had first-hand information of prior specific warning obtained from a reliable informant in April 2001 on the terrorist attacks of September 11. Mr. Sarshar contacted the Commission directly but was refused. He was given an interview with the Commission investigators only after 9/11 family members intervened directly. Mr. Sarshar’s documented testimony was completely omitted from the commission’s final report, despite his case being publicly confirmed by Director Mueller’s Office.



Mike German, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. German served sixteen years as an FBI Special Agent and is one of the rare agents credited with actually having prevented acts of terrorism before it became the FBI's number one priority. He contacted the Commission in the spring of 2004, but did not receive a response. In 2002 he reported gross mismanagement in a post 9/11-counterterrorism investigation, which included serious violations of FBI policy and federal law. Mr. German contacted the 9/11 Commission during its investigation and requested that he be given an interview session in order to provide them with certain domestic counterterrorism investigations that he’d pursued. According to Mr. German there were links between certain domestic and international counterterrorism related to the September 11 attacks. The 9/11 Commissioners refused to acknowledge his request and never interviewed him.



Gilbert Graham, Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence; FBI - Mr. Graham worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office Counterintelligence Division until 2002. In February 2004 his name and contact information were provided to the Commission as a key witness with information pertinent to the Commission’s investigation. The 9/11 Commission refused to follow up and never contacted Mr. Graham.



Coleen Rowley, Retired Division Counsel; FBI - In May 2002, Coleen Rowley, as the Division Counsel at the FBI Minneapolis Office, blew the whistle on the FBI’s failure to pursue Zacarias Moussaoui’s case prior to 9/11, despite all attempts made by the Minneapolis division counterterrorism agents. She reported that FBI HQ personnel in Washington, D.C., had mishandled and neglected to take action on information provided by her division. Despite her high-profile case the commission chose not to interview Ms. Rowley. According to Ms. Rowley, no one from the FBI Minneapolis Office (several Agents had direct information) was ever asked to provide testimony, information, to the 9/11 Commission.



Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer, DIA - Colonel Shaffer provided the Commission with detailed information on intelligence and pre warning information obtained by his unit’s data mining project, Able Danger. The 9/11 commission staff received not one but two briefings on Able Danger from Mr. Shaffer and his former team members, yet did not pursue the case, did not follow up on this documented report and refused to subpoena the relevant files. Mr. Shaffer’s testimony, together with other witnesses who corroborated his testimony and information, were censored by the 9/11 Commissioners and never made it to its final report.



Dick Stoltz, Retired Special Agent; ATF- Mr. Stoltz, a veteran undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, had played an important role in Operation Diamondback between 1998 and 2001. The sting operation involved a group of Middle Eastern men living in New Jersey who were caught on tape in an ATF weapons sting conspiring to buy millions of dollars of weapons including components for nuclear bombs. The case came to a screeching halt with the arrest of only a handful of suspects in June of 2001 even though there was ample evidence that some of the people who were attempting to buy these weapons had connections with the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden himself. The 9/11 Commission refused to contact Agent Stoltz despite all attempts made by several witnesses from the intelligence & Law Enforcement Communities, and the 9/11 Family group, Jersey Moms.



Bogdan Dzakovic, Former Red Team Leader; FAA - Mr. Dzakovic had worked for the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration since 1987 as a Special Agent, as a Team Leader in the Federal Air Marshals, and from 1995 until September 11, 2001 was a Team Leader of the Red Team (terrorist team). Mr. Dzakovic had tried for several years prior to the 9-11 attacks to improve aviation security in the face of the ever-increasing terrorist threat. He provided the 9/11 Commission with his testimony and documented reports. His testimony and report to the Commission was completely omitted from the final report.



Linda Lewis, Retired Emergency Programs Specialist; USDA - Ms. Lewis worked for 13 years evaluating and coordinating federal, state and local preparedness for nuclear, radiological and chemical weapons emergencies. Prior to September 11, 2001, she had reported numerous inadequacies and dysfunctions in emergency preparedness, including a culture of intimidation that discouraged federal evaluators from reporting inadequacies in state and local plans and preparedness. USDA officials had thwarted her efforts to bring in terrorism experts to help the agency prepare for attacks on federal buildings, including bio-weapons attacks such as the anthrax attacks of 2001. In vain, she had urged FEMA officials to develop a national emergency communications plan and require interoperability of federally funded emergency communications equipment. In the absence of these preparations, New York City firefighters and police officers were unable to communicate critical information on September 11 at the World Trade Center. Ms. Lewis contacted the Commission and offered to provide information regarding dysfunctional government preparedness, but the Commission never responded.



Mark Burton, Senior Analyst; NSA – Mr. Burton served as an all-source threat analyst in NSA’s Information Assurance Directorate (IAD) for most of his 16-year career. He was the editor of IAD’s premier threat document; the 300+ page ISSO Global Threat Summary, and was an adjunct faculty member at NSA’s National Cryptologic School. He provided dozens of pages of relevant information to the 9/11 Commission, but was completely ignored and never asked to testify.





The above list does not include many others from the intelligence and law enforcement communities who had similarly contacted or reported to the commission but had been either turned away or censored, and of course many others’ who are still working within these agencies and are fearful of making their identities known, due to the relentless pursuit of and retaliation against whistleblowers by government agencies.





About National Security Whistleblowers Coalition

National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), founded in August 2004, is an independent and nonpartisan alliance of whistleblowers who have come forward to address our nation’s security weaknesses; to inform authorities of security vulnerabilities in our intelligence agencies, at nuclear power plants and weapon facilities, in airports, and at our nation’s borders and ports; to uncover government waste, fraud, abuse, and in some cases criminal conduct. The NSWBC is dedicated to aiding national security whistleblowers through a variety of methods, including advocacy of governmental and legal reform, educating the public concerning whistleblowing activity, provision of comfort and fellowship to national security whistleblowers suffering retaliation and other harms, and working with other public interest organizations to affect goals defined in the NSWBC mission statement. For more on NSWBC visit www.nswbc.org



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nobody will even watch this piece of shit movie.
Who cares what they say? It doesn't make it so. It's just another embarrassment for ABC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. That's what I'm thinking. It won't be a ratings hit, for sure. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Besides, Bush has said OBL is irrelevant now
But that to is probably Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. ABC will be held accountable for the lies and fabrications in it.

They will not be able to say they did not know and blame the writers or directors. It is ABC, its managers and owners that show themselves as traitors and propagandist of the lowest of the low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. EVERYONE should print out the thinkprogress
article and carry it with them for the next couple of weeks... I can't believe they're trying to put this tripe into the schools as fact..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. ABC needs to be condemned for this inaccurate presentation
If CBS and Dan Rather were raked over the coals and discredited for their program providing info that in substance was true (but documentation was shaky) about Bush's National Guard service, ABC should be held to the same level of documented accuracy when pointing blame right before a major election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. If it's good enough for CBS and "The Reagans", then it should be
good enough for ABC and "The Road to 9/11" ...

ABC should pull it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. knr, kpete!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thinkprogress also had this:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/04/path-blog-yanked/

"On September 10 and 11, ABC is planning to air a “docudrama” called “Path to 9/11,” billed as “an objective telling of the events of 9/11.” In fact, the film was written by an unabashed conservative who twists the facts to blame President Clinton.

The show’s official blog attracted many comments from the public criticizing the film for its inaccuracies. In response, writer Cyrus Nowrasteh and director David Cunningham posted a number of strikingly defensive blog posts. Some excerpts:

Clarification

1) This is not a documentary…

2) This is not a right wing agenda movie…By the way, we are also being accused of being a left wing movie that bashes Bush.

-D. Cunningham
Wed, Aug 30, 2006 22:01"

more at the link...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. I don't think it was all made up by Howrasteh, that rumor has been
floating around the repuke boards for YEARS. I'm just so shocked that he didn't do his research on these facts.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT POST OF THE WEEK! Send this to ABC with
complaints! This Republican version of events has the potential to firmly establish goddamn lies in the minds of over a hundred million Americans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. The freepers finally get their "Clinton was handed Bin Laden
on a silver platter" nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. An ABC Shitcom?
We need to alert KO ahead of time about this. If KO could do a build-up about the lies to come, it might really do some damage to the “docudrama” before the fascho-drama damages the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. If Richard Clarke is an AB C Consultant it is obvious
that he was not consulted on this trash. It is obvious why he was not consulted. He should go on as many TV shows as possible to debunk this tripe. Will he loes his Consultant job now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Richard Clarke seems far to honest, to be of much service in any
way, shape or form, to the Bush Gang. Bush don't keep people who won't lie on demand. I don't trust anyone connected to Bush or the PNAC. What if everyone lied to the government the way they lie to us? They wouldn't like that, would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. K&R - They've been claiming this movie is a factual account.
Now it looks like the big moment of this "factual account" is an outright falsehood.

ABC needs to re-examine this in light of the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. they said "objective"...
so i guess it depends on how you view objects...

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. Thanks,I'm sending this to Keith Olbermann
and writing ABC -again- to demand truth in broadcasting.

Keep up the pressure you guys. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Good!
lets all write to Keith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrictlyRockers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
42. Baa! Baa! Blame Clinton! Baa! Baa! Democrats soft! Baa! Baa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. This is Seriously F8cked up
ABC must be held accountable for their actions, as should all those who would create a "new" truth for their own political reasons. This is a sick Republican hatchet job, NOT entertainment. Is there a single Republican capable of telling the truth anymore? ABC must give Democrats at least two hours of free time to refute this crap, because all this is an attack on Democrats and the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. It's an attack on TRUTH. It's an attack on everything
AUTHENTIC Americans live by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamyourTVandIownyou Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. You swallow the stories I feed you!
How dare you question me?

Disney is gospel. Mwa-ha-ha.


WHO OWNS WHAT: The Walt Disney Company
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/disney.asp

American Broadcasting Company
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Company

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
50. see, they had me fooled
I thought that really happened and that's one of the doubts I always held against Clinton. Here, Clinton had done everything he could do short of all out war to catch Osama, which the rethugs would've said was wasting billions and not approved in the halls of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. Is it fascism yet?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. Clinton administration passed on chance to kill bin Laden did happen!!
CIA needed ok from White House because one of the "innocent" persons who also would be killed (colateral damage) was Saudi son of a wealthy oil concern.

Bill then said no...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. link?
i have read this shit for years and all over the place and i havent heard this one. i need the proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. Bullshit. Never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. Bullshit
You wanna back up that pile with some facts? Come on, show me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #52
73. Still waiting for your source...
*whistling*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. Hey, Any Friend of Rush's
is NOT to be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
56. ABC' and the False Movie
The only way to really counter this is boycott. WE have to pick the sponsors and boycott them. I don't watch ABC anyway there is nothing worth watching. My remote has it programmed out. We ought to make sure we all program ABC out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
58. the movie sounds like crap
I won't be watching it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. you know I wonder how Bush would feel
if they put in the 9/11 story that he took Osama Bin Ladens
family out of the country.i bet he would be mad as fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
60. I remember this event the neo-cons were up in arms " NO WAR FOR MONICA!"
There was actually a chance that bin Laden may have been on his farm here at the time in Afghanistan however what WAS certain was that many innocent civilians INCLUDING at least a dozen or so children would be slaughtered by such a strike-and the Clinton Administration felt that this was not the right thing to do on what could barely be called a hunch. Especially with right wing radio led by Rush and the other punkasses already claiming that Clinton was starting wars in Afghanistan to cover up the Monica bullshit.


In short neo-cons you lose on this one BIGTIME. The strike didn't occur due to one-sided intel at best, not to mention the absolute effects such a strike would've had on both our ability to wage an effective war which required cooperation and intelligence from sources that would've instantly turned their back on us had we dealt such a strike that would've taken innocent lives that they cared about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
62. so who would know the truth
a repug righwing hack writer of fiction or our top Intellience Czar?

for the low IQ, idiot freeper lurkers, the answer if the Czar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
65. ABC
ABC = Always Blame Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. The revisionists strike again - nt
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
68. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
69. This is another attempt to rewrite history,
From someone who wasn't there, doesn't know what was going on, and is just amking this shit up.

If this keeps going, 4 years from now, they'll be telling people that Bush is the greatest President the Untied States ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
70. Never happened never stopped the NAZI's why should it stop
this new breed? Next goes the books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
76. Too bad that no one watching the movie will ever hear or believe this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC