Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Declares Eco-Whistleblower Law Void for EPA Employees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:18 PM
Original message
Bush Declares Eco-Whistleblower Law Void for EPA Employees
Bush Declares Eco-Whistleblower Law Void for EPA Employees
Stealth Repeal of Clean Water Act Protections by Invoking "Sovereign Immunity"
By: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility
Published: Sep 4, 2006 at 08:40


The Bush administration has declared itself immune from whistleblower protections for federal workers under the Clean Water Act, according to legal documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). As a result of an opinion issued by a unit within the Office of the Attorney General, federal workers will have little protection from official retaliation for reporting water pollution enforcement breakdowns, manipulations of science or cleanup failures.

Citing an "unpublished opinion of the Attorney General's Office of Legal Counsel," the Secretary of Labor's Administrative Review Board has ruled federal employees may no longer pursue whistleblower claims under the Clean Water Act. The opinion invoked the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity which is based on the old English legal maxim that "The King Can Do No Wrong." It is an absolute defense to any legal action unless the "sovereign" consents to be sued.

The opinion and the ruling reverse nearly two decades of precedent. Approximately 170,000 federal employees working within environmental agencies are affected by the loss of whistleblower rights.

more at:
http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_41616.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just threw up a little in my mouth
1/20/09 cannot come soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely outrageous. Totally sidestepping Congress.
Just like skipping a stone from one outrage to the next until the whole thing finally reaches a critical point and sinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:23 PM
Original message
What pigs these republicons are
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 05:24 PM by SpiralHawk
They want to make massive profits, destroy the public treasures of America, and hide it all -- while prosecuting anyone who points it out.

low low low -- amoral in the extreme.

republicons are lacking in all honor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Long live King George the First.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. my gawd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. James Watt doesn't seem as evil to me anymore . 'Dominion Theocracy'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. "unpublished opinion of the Attorney General's Office of Legal Counsel,"
So, the AG office made a ruling, did not publish it, yet it is law!

"unpublished opinion of the Attorney General's Office of Legal Counsel,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Two decades of precedent swept away at a stroke. what's 200?
This bastard has "decider" power and he can remake the government and the country in his own twisted image.

ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im-Peach-Ment Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "The opinion invoked the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity " !!!



The opinion invoked the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity which is based on the old English legal maxim that "The King Can Do No Wrong." It is an absolute defense to any legal action unless the "sovereign" consents to be sued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. and other new dump here:
Govt. asks to keep eavesdropping program

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer Fri Sep 1, 5:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration on Friday asked a federal judge to delay enforcing her order for a halt to the government's warrantless communications surveillance program.
ADVERTISEMENT

The Justice Department argued that ending the intelligence-gathering program threatens "the gravest of harms to the government and to the American public" and leaves the country "more vulnerable to terrorist attack."

"We respectfully submit that this court should not override the national security judgment of the president and the nation's senior intelligence officers regarding the harm that would result" from the program's suspension, the government lawyers argued in a motion filed with the court.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last month in Detroit that the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program is unconstitutional and ordered that it be halted.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060901/ap_on_go_pr_wh/eavesdropping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. The executive rewriting and interpreting laws
See anything the matter with this picture, all you constitutional originalists? Mr. Scalia? Mr. Thomas? Any of you other sock puppets on the Court? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. but says Congress could easily end this abuse:
want to bet a nickle that this is not even on the radar screen?



"It is astonishing for the Bush administration to now suddenly claim that it is above the law," said PEER Senior Counsel Paula Dinerstein, who is handling Erickson's appeal of the Labor Secretary's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit based in Atlanta. "Congress could end this debate by simply declaring that it intends that the whistleblower protections of these anti-pollution laws apply to the federal government."

Congress is now debating Clean Water Act clarifications in the wake of a confusing U.S. Supreme Court decision (Rapanos et ux., et al. v. United States) handed down this June that muddies the extent of federal jurisdiction over wetlands. Unless Congress also resolves the Clean Water Act sovereign immunity question, scores of federal employee whistleblower cases may be dismissed or languish in limbo while the issue is litigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I am sending an email to my Senators right NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. This sounds like something from the Onion
I can imagine the screaming if Clinton had tried something this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loves_dulcinea Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. i wrote that to my repub senator.
rofl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. This, combined with the closing of the EPA libraries
Will go a long way toward destroying any hope that information about environmental crimes will ever reach the American public.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. um . . . he can't do that . . . but will the Congress . . .
stand up to him? . . . my guess is no -- but stay tuned . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. "EPA Whistle-blowers can eat Cake!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Happy Labor Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loves_dulcinea Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. i just wrote my senator
i have to say that if Senator Lindsay Graham doesn't rise to this, then i have no hope until the next cycle.
i can't decide if Senator Jim Demint is a puppet of the fundamentalists or the plutocrats.
Representative Henry Brown sold his soul a looooooooooooooooong time ago. i have high hopes for Maata.

it sometimes sux to live in a state so red.

damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. "unpublished opinion of the Attorney General's Office"
Abu Gonzales won't let anyone annoy King George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. this is the LBN thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC