Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smile, Politicians! You're on YouTube (LAT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:24 PM
Original message
Smile, Politicians! You're on YouTube (LAT)
By P.J. Huffstutter, Times Staff Writer
September 4, 2006


CHICAGO — The voyeurism of reality TV has collided with the political arena, thanks to digital technologies and the broad reach of a website: Alongside clips of animal antics and goofy celebrity parodies, the gaffes of this year's candidates are being posted, watched — and ridiculed.

YouTube, founded last year as a way for friends to share digital videos, has emerged as a powerful campaign tool, used by political operatives and interested citizens to anonymously and cheaply spread messages or blow whistles.

<snip>

Some see YouTube as a way to bring authenticity to the political process and attract a younger generation of voters. Others fear that it will make politicians even less spontaneous in public, and say that anonymous video postings invite doctoring to create false and damaging impressions.

<snip>

When Republican Sen. Conrad Burns briefly nodded off during a Montana farm-bill hearing in August, a state Democratic worker was taping him. Within hours of being posted to YouTube, the clip was drawing viewers and comments, such as "This senile old goat would probably do less damage if he slept thru more Senate hearings."

<more>

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-youtube4sep04,0,4698346.story?coll=la-home-nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. it is sites such as this that would be harmed if net neutrality passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bingo...
They do not have the $$$ to pay AT&T for high speed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. And the problem with this is ...?
The article makes it sound like showing politicians as they actually are is some sinister development. Of course, it is possible to take little things way out of context, but this medium is still far more informative than the carefully packaged phony bits that the campaigns use to advertise themselves.

The "Macaca" comment by Allen was far more revealing than anything that would emerge from teh carefully scripted campaign appearances and debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC