Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH "insider" tells cons: Bush backs off 'Islamic fascists'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:42 PM
Original message
WH "insider" tells cons: Bush backs off 'Islamic fascists'
Tones down war rhetoric to appease Muslim groups

President Bush has toned down his war rhetoric after Muslim-rights groups complained his description of the enemy as "Islamic fascists" unfairly equates Islam with terrorism. In his speech to the American Legion Thursday, Bush backed away from the term, defining the enemy simply as "fascists" and "totalitarians." He said the war on terror was an "ideological struggle" with terrorists who "kill those who stand in the way of their totalitarian ideology," but he did not identify the source of the ideology. His only reference to Islam during the speech was in noting that the Muslim terrorists are distorting the tenets of the religion. "Free societies are a threat to their twisted view of Islam," he said. In a press conference last week, Bush also avoided repeating the phrase "Islamic fascists," reverting instead to more general language such as "extremists" to describe the threat. "This is a global war on terror. We're facing, you know, extremists that believe something," he said. "And they want to achieve objectives.".

While the White House declined to comment officially about the dropping of the term 'Islamic fascists,' a White House insider explained that the president is sensitive to concerns raised by Muslim leaders. "The president never meant to imply we're at war with Islam, but some took it that way," the official said. "It's not a climb-down as much as a recognition of the concerns of the Muslim community."

In a major rhetorical shift, Bush last month began describing the enemy as "Islamic fascists," sparking a firestorm of criticism from Muslim groups.
...
The White House insider says it's unlikely Bush will repeat the term "Islamic fascists" out of deference to Muslim groups.


That's from NRO's "The Corner" quoting World Nut Daily, via a link embedded in Wolcott's excellent blog here-

"...To the dismay of the hard nosers, Bush is also reeling back his use of "Islamic fascists", which will be interpreted as a capitulation to political correctness."

http://jameswolcott.com/archives/2006/09/five_minutes_to.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this a flip-flop?
or, is he morally confused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm, that idea wasn't winning huh Shrub?
Stuff it! they do opinion panels all the time. I guess the pollster scewed up this time huh>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too late......everytime he uses the term fascists brains will
process: Islamofascists. Once again he gets what he wants and now that he's removed the Islamo part the Muslims can't complain! Oh, he's so brillant....or Rove! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's insulting
to American muslims, the vast majority who are moderate muslims...and his backers in Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. he has to utter 'christo' & 'hindu' fascist to make any of it stick imo...
but he doesn't have the guts or the game/war plan to follow up with the shit storm that would follow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's the public acceptance of such hatred and bigotry that enrages me
Not long ago, before Bush**, no one who wanted to keep their cushy job in Washington would be caught dead saying the reprehensible things these Neo-pubs do with impunity. Racial slurs, epithets, gutter talk -- all of it hailed by the knuckle-draggers in society. I just can't believe what I'm hearing most of the time, or that the level of discourse has sunk so low without anyone calling these bastards on it.

I'm no prude. But I don't think hearing our statesmen refer to people as "macaca" and publicly expounding on their prejudices reflects well on a country that supposedly stands for equality and freedom. It's dishonorable, and shines a bright light on just how far we've deviated from those principles with the Repugs in power.

I was thinking this morning that if any Democratic rep had pulled an Allen while Clinton was president, he would have thrown them out of DC on their EAR. There have been worse instances since the GOP-cons took over. Yet Bush** has reprimanded no one. Indeed, he engages in the same divisive hate talk.

This is NOT my America. I reject it and everything the Repukes stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC