Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Can Israel Ignore Over 66 UN Resolutions Regarding It?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
G2099 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:16 PM
Original message
How Can Israel Ignore Over 66 UN Resolutions Regarding It?
And the world does nothing?

Are they "special" that they can ignore over 66 United Nations Resolution regarding the state of Israel?

What kind of "double standard" world do we live in here?

What the hell is going down on this planet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. In case you haven't noticed, the US blocks all enforcement.
And that is why the world does nothing.

Because the US has a veto on the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly ,like going to War without the U.N.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G2099 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where the heck is the Standard of Justice and Equality in this World?
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 02:22 PM by G2099
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's called the United States of America.
Perhaps the standard has been debased somewhat in recent years, but nonetheless it is the standard, and if it says what Israel does is just and right, then so far as international law is concerned, in the practice thereof, it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. How can the Arab world ignore the BIG one that ESTABLISHED Israel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CollegeDUer Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes, what the arabs say is more hurtful than what Israel says
I've heard this garbage many times. Palestinians are still being pushed out of their homes and crushed by tanks while these hypocrites chant for the "recognition of israel"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. See who Her Daddy Warbucks is.....
and all will be answered. A rampaging kid doesn't stop rampaging until dad cuts the purse strings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. The same way Bush ignores direct court orders-He just says fuck you and
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 02:42 PM by LaPera
what can you do about it?

Ha, I thought so.... NOTHING!

Same with Israel. Israel's right-wing government can do as they please and say fuck you, because no will fuck with their big daddy, the US & BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Friends in high places
It's helpful to have a pal as one of the permanent members of the Security Council.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Have you actually *read* any of the resolution?
The ones I've seen all say the final boundaries have to be set by negotiations. Israel has never been required to withdraw unilaterally from areas from which she was attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CollegeDUer Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Israel the feminine
A great linguistic trick to try to create sympathy for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Would you have preferred it as "Israel the kike"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CollegeDUer Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Israel the "outlaw" makes the best sense, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Which law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CollegeDUer Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Almost all of the international laws
Except genocide, I think it's up for everything up until that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Be specific.
Which law, set up by whom, did "they" (noticed I didn't use "her" - I know how sensitive you are about that) did they violate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Linguistic trick? Can't you leave domestic politics out of this?
Mother Russia isn't a linguistic trick either ... and 'Fatherland' always had negative connotations for me. In Hebrew, "eretz" as in "eretz yisroel" is feminine, hence the she.

Look, I know you don't like the questionably legitimate regime we got, but you're projecting your animosity in the wrong direction. Now, don't you feel stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. The same way other countries do...
the UN passes resolutions that don't have the consequences clearly stated in the resolution. When it's broken, they argue over what to do about it an nothing gets done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here's a list of resolutions/Israel
A list of UN Resolutions against "Israel"

1955-1992:
* Resolution 106: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid".
* Resolution 111: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".
* Resolution 127: " . . . 'recommends' Israel suspends it's 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".
* Resolution 162: " . . . 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".
* Resolution 171: " . . . determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".
* Resolution 228: " . . . 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".
* Resolution 237: " . . . 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees".
* Resolution 248: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".
* Resolution 250: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
* Resolution 251: " . . . 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
* Resolution 252: " . . . 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
* Resolution 256: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".
* Resolution 259: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".
* Resolution 262: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport".
* Resolution 265: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan".
* Resolution 267: " . . . 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
*Resolution 270: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".
* Resolution 271: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
* Resolution 279: " . . . 'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon".
* Resolution 280: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon".
* Resolution 285: " . . . 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon".
* Resolution 298: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
* Resolution 313: " . . . 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".
* Resolution 316: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".
* Resolution 317: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".
* Resolution 332: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon".
* Resolution 337: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty".
* Resolution 347: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon".
* Resolution 425: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
* Resolution 427: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon.
* Resolution 444: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".
* Resolution 446: " . . . 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious
obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
* Resolution 450: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".
* Resolution 452: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".
* Resolution 465: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member
states not to assist Israel's settlements program".
* Resolution 467: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon".
* Resolution 468: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of
two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".
* Resolution 469: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the
council's order not to deport Palestinians".
* Resolution 471: " . . . 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide
by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
* Resolution 476: " . . . 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
* Resolution 478: " . . . 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its
claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'".
* Resolution 484: " . . . 'declares it imperative' that Israel re-admit two deported
Palestinian mayors".
* Resolution 487: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's
nuclear facility".
* Resolution 497: " . . . 'decides' that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan
Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith".
* Resolution 498: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".
* Resolution 501: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".
* Resolution 509: " . . . 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".
* Resolution 515: " . . . 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and
allow food supplies to be brought in".
* Resolution 517: " . . . 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions
and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
* Resolution 518: " . . . 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".
* Resolution 520: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".
* Resolution 573: " . . . 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia
in attack on PLO headquarters.
* Resolution 587: " . . . 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw
its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".
* Resolution 592: " . . . 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students
at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".
* Resolution 605: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices
denying the human rights of Palestinians.
* Resolution 607: " . . . 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly
requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
* Resolution 608: " . . . 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
* Resolution 636: " . . . 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
* Resolution 641: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
* Resolution 672: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for violence against Palestinians
at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
* Resolution 673: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United
Nations.
* Resolution 681: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of
Palestinians.
* Resolution 694: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and
calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
* Resolution 726: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
* Resolution 799: ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians
and calls for their immediate return.

http://www.middleeastnews.com/unresolutionslist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Just as I thought
From you link back to resolution 425

2. Calls upon Israel immediately to cease its military action against Lebanese territorial integrity and withdraw forthwith its forces from all Lebanese territory;

3. Decides, in the light of the request of the Government of Lebanon, to establish immediately under its authority a United Nations interim force for southern Lebanon for the purpose of confirming the withdrawal of Israeli forces, restoring international peace and security and assisting the Government of Lebanon in ensuring the return of its effective authority in the area, the force to be composed of personnel drawn from States Members of the United Nations.


Lets see ... Israel has ceased military action and what does forthwith mean? As quickly as reasonably possible.

As for immediately ... does anyone here see a UN interim force in place yet? As soon as one exists, Israel will once again withdraw from Lebanese territory, just as the UN certified she did last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why should anyone listen to the UN?
what did the UN do about Tiannemen Square? How much good have UN peacekeepers done in Kashmir?

The UN is merely a format which allows the powerful Nation-States to have sway in international politics. It cares nothing for people. And the standard for the world must be the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. locking
HOW WE WILL BE HANDLING DISCUSSION OF THE MIDDLE EAST CONFLICT FROM THIS POINT FORWARD

Discussions involving Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Hamas, et al. must once again take place in the Israel/Palestine forum and must abide by the rules of that forum.

Discussions of the Middle East conflict may take place in the Latest Breaking News forum providing that they abide by the rules of that forum.
Please don't send us complaints that the subject has been "banished" to the "basement." If you are truly interested in discussing this subject in a civil fashion, you can get to the Israel/Palestine forum with two clicks of your mouse. If you are logged in, you can add the Israel/Palestine forum to your "My Forums" listing by simply clicking here.

Thank you once again for your patience and understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC