Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Shields on The NewsHour: If this is as big as WWII, then

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:36 PM
Original message
Mark Shields on The NewsHour: If this is as big as WWII, then
why doesn't Bush fight the war in Iraq to win? Why doesn't he have more troops and equipment there?

I am paraphrasing, but I think he may have also hit on the subject of taxes. If this is a huge ideological war, then why isn't he raising taxes, especially on those that got cuts, to fund this war?

David Brooks couldn't disagree with his assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I especially like the tax question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. why didn't he raise taxes &
why did he fight the war with IOUs from China, that seemed a boneheaded thing to do, just imagine buying a car and expecting your grandkids to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2.  I love Mark Shields & donate to PBS for this show, snip below
MARK SHIELDS: Speeches. The president's speeches. The president said, in particularly the Salt Lake City speech, that this was the ideological battle of the 21st century, the battle of Iraq, upon its outcome and victory there, dependent victory in the battle of the war against terrorism.

If that's true, what the hell are we doing with 130,000 troops there? We ought to have half a million. Why haven't we mobilized the home front? Why aren't we paying for this? I mean, why, seriously, isn't the country on a war-footing, if that's really what he's talking about?
And comparing this to battle against communism, the Cold War, and comparing it to the battle against Nazism? I mean, to me, you're making a statement like that, and then you just totally contradict yourself by saying, "We're going to continue with this failed policy and this failed approach."

JIM LEHRER: What about that, David?
DAVID BROOKS:
“...Mark's point is perfectly valid, though. If it's that big, why aren't we fighting to win? Why aren't we committing 80 percent of the troops necessary to do the job?”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec06/sb_09-01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Thank you! I hadn't looked for it because I didn't think it would
posted yet on thier website. Great snip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, and those with broadband can watch the clips
I am still with slow poke dial-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Slightly OT: Shields was a Marine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I remember that. He and Jim Lehrer can both speak with
some experience and authority on the Marines. In fact, when there were several other headline stories about the Marines, good or bad, they both seemed to have a very personal take on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Outstanding point, Mark Shields..
Why is it a sneaky warfare on Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not hard to find points displaying the idiocy of bushitler, it's in the
pointing where the difficulty lies. Good on Mark Shields!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC