Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armitage source of Plame leak??? Deafeningly silent bombshell?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:31 PM
Original message
Armitage source of Plame leak??? Deafeningly silent bombshell?
I don't know what to make of this. I heard only sideways comments regarding this last week, regarding the possibility Powell's CoS, Richard Armitage, may have inadvertently been Novackula's source on the identity of Valery Plame, and the lack of a reaction in the bloggosphere has me scratching my head. Either, it's a bombshell no one wants to acknowledge, or it's total nonsense not worth responding too. But Armitage himself seems genuinely concerned.

The most notorious pseudo-Democrat, Vanity Fair's Christopher Hitchens, had a story in Slate yesterday cheering his "vindication" after years of defending George Bush and disparaging the Plame investigation (God only knows why Left-leaning mags like Slate and Vanity Fair continue to call him a Democrat and give him space on their pages (a pro-Iraq-war hawk that makes Lieberman look like Barney Frank, Hitchens is as much a Democrat as I am Karl Rove's love-child).

So what is the story here? I know there's more too it, and the fact regarding the way the Bush Administration *used* this information to discredit Wilson and justify their war can not be disputed, but the deafening silence around here on the subject bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. What more is there to say, really?
Reporters have more than one source. Good ones, or OLD School ones, do, anyway.

Tweety was told by ROVE that Valerie was fair game. Not by Armitage. Tweety then picked up the phone and told Joe Wilson.

The original leak means nothing without the attack that accompanies it--the attack on Plame came from the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. That darked haired creepy little guy (wears glasses) who appears
on Countdown all of the time was on there the other night and basically said the attack on Wilson was justified because he was going around "pretending that he worked for the State Department".

I hate that guy and I don't understand why KO has him on alllll of the time. I think he is a political writer for Newsweek or Time. I can't remember his name because I don't want to. Right click - delete the creepy little glasses wearing rodent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Mike Allen, Time Magazine?
He's a zombie & he's on ALL the MSNBC shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No - isn't Allen bald ? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. You're right.
And I don't know that KO has him on. He is usually on Hardball, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You mean Michael Isikoff, Newsweek?
Agreed. I saw his name on this story and I've been extremely skeptical of it since, even without all the loose ends it leaves dangling.

Never mind Armitage signed on to a couple of PNAC's letters in the late 90s, including the infamous letter to Clinton urging him to attack Iraq. No one who has any history with PNAC and the neocons is credible as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Armitage
Phony and fake US Navy SEAL says it all.

The truth is not in such people.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AValdoux Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Outing Armitage...
...vindicates Rove. The Libby trial will a "legal technicality driven by partisan politics".

Case closed.


AValdoux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who told ARMITAGE???
Keep asking that question.

The fingers still point to the White House. He had no way of knowing Plame's real job nor did he have any way of knowing about her front company.

Somebody told HIM. Keep making that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And we wonder why the CIA and the Pentagon does not
(never has) been able to trust the State Department. And, why the State Department does not trust the spooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Considered that. But raises other questions.
Despite a few comments, for the most part, Amitage has been surprisingly anti-NeoCon, so the question as to "why" anyone would supply him with the information as a means of inflicting damage on Plame while defending the Bush WH doesn't make any sense.

It would be like using a butter-knife to cut a loaf of bread... it may work... it may not, but a mess is guaranteed. So why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. It will soon
be seen as an important part of the advances in the civil case. It may have Chris Hitchens happy at this moment. But it will not have Rove or Cheney happy. But you are correct in that the significance is not yet understood by the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. wake me up when the fat lady sings
I'm sick of their jury poisoning crapola.

And I don't believe Armitage is the end of the story--but I do believe he is a "nice enough guy" to fall on his sword for the cause--especially if there are no punishments involved in a "silly booboo."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC