Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the unthinkable happens (going it alone with Iran)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:46 AM
Original message
If the unthinkable happens (going it alone with Iran)
John Gittings
August 30, 2006 11:00 AM

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/john_gittings/2006/08/raising_the_stakes_on_iran.html

The US, we have been told in the past week, may "bypass the UN" on Iran and go it alone, forming an "independent coalition" to impose sanctions on Tehran. The formal expiry tomorrow (August 31) of the UN deadline for Iran to suspend uranium enrichment will mark the start of a new stage in this crisis. It also adds force to a much bigger question: is the US now preparing, and if so how seriously, to "go it alone" by taking military action against Iran?

The last time this was suggested was by Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker in April. As often happens with his stories, this one became polemicised with, broadly speaking, his conclusions being accepted by anti-war commentators and rubbished as anti-US propaganda by supporters of the Bush administration (though it's not clear why they should regard it as anti-US to suggest that Bush might go to war again - since they have applauded him for doing so before).

This time the hypothesis is not confined to Hersh. According to a United Press International editorial analysis (and UPI is not known for its radical views):

"...odds makers are betting that sometime before the end of his second term, President Bush will order a massive air attack on a wide range of carefully selected targets in Iran, in partnership with Israel, and against the advice of many of his advisers."

More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I take issue with this sentence:
This time the hypothesis is not confined to Hersh. According to a United Press International editorial analysis (and UPI is not known for its radical views):

UPI is owned by that whackjob Reverend Moon. Their radical views are precisely the reason that Helen Thomas quit them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCentrist Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. If Bush isn't stopped
It is going to happen;Iran was part of the NeoCON agenda fron the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes indeed.
Then N. Korea. PNAC is not a fallacy in our heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC