Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warner Voices Frustration With Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:02 AM
Original message
Warner Voices Frustration With Democrats
AMES, Iowa (AP) -- Mark Warner, a potential 2008 presidential candidate, voiced growing concern Tuesday with his party's electoral strategy, arguing that Democrats' willingness to write off sections of the country could make it nearly impossible to win the White House.

"I got pretty frustrated after 2004," said the former Virginia governor. "We are making a mistake if we put up candidates that are only competitive in 16 states and then we roll the dice and hope we win Ohio or Florida."

In an interview with The Associated Press, Warner insisted he wasn't being critical of 2004 Democratic nominee John Kerry, whom he called "a very strong candidate." But Warner said Democrats must stop conceding entire regions of the country.

"We do our party and the country a disservice if we're not competitive in the South and the balance of the Midwest," Warner said. "I'm disappointed in campaigns that write off the South and leave behind wide swaths of our country."

"We've got to have candidates who can campaign not only in Ames, but at NASCAR races, candidates who can campaign in the barrio and changing communities," Warner said. "We've got to have a message that's more focused on solutions than simply focused on criticism."

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_WARNER?SITE=CATOR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-08-29-23-33-41
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. "not competitive in the South"
Kind of creating an argument for his own candidacy isn't he?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why not? Warner makes a good candidate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because of the corporate ties.
I'd rather Warner be there than McCain, but, honestly, I'm so tired of both parties kissing corporate ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Governor Warner, the South appears filled with unreconstructed confederate
Governor Warner, the South appears filled with unreconstructed confederate dumfucks.

They hate the poor, blacks, unions, disabled people, people getting TANF'ed. They side with the republicans even though they don't earn much more than middle class or lower middle class incomes.

They may have the votes but we can whack the Republicans corporate donors figuratively in the shins with consumer boycotts and actually drive the legislation process even if the Republicans take the presidency again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I smell stereotyping...in stereo no less
That include our last three Four Democratic Presidents?

LBJ Carter, Clinton and Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. No, there exist plenty of good white Southern people.
I'm talking about the ones who vote REPUBLIKLAN.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Just remember they user to be our idiots and we should want them back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh he definitely is going to run as the Southern candidate
The interesting thing to me is how similar his comments are to Howard Dean's in 2004

He mentioned NASCAR, but never mentioned Dixie Decals on pick-up trucks.

Saying that The Bubba vote is important for any candidate to mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I'd say. If you look at regionalism, it's a two sided coin...
Looking at our losses vs our wins since 1968 you might just as easily get the impression southern Democrats are more southern than Democratic and rather less inclined to vote for someone from a certain 16 northern states.

Frankly, I think this is well worn DLC talking point. It's somewhat important to consider in this analysis that the DLC was in large part organized as an alternative good old boy system to the party bosses from those 16 northern states.

Elite democratic good old boy systems more interested in incumbency than productivity, wherever the hell they come from, are just what progressives don't want anymore. We've had plenty of that since 1994 and support for rule by self-proclaimed leaders who can't even mount opposition let alone get anything done has reached a low ebb.

Since I can't recall any candidate actually writing off the south in 2000 or 2004 in my book I score Warner's comments as minus 10 to House Hufflepuff for the use of a straw man against other Democrats.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yeah, not just a slight bit self serving? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have a better Southern candidate in mind
One that won't be considered by "the Bubbas" as a wimp.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gee I wonder who? :)
I am completely ambivalent about your guy. I honestly do not think he would win unless we are attacked again. Not because he is not right on the issues. I just think there is going to be a hugern Iraq fatigue in 2008 and the nation is oing to want to domesttic issues.

Wes has got fine credentials for a wartime president, but I am not sure he can run on failure in Iraq.

Now having said that...how about an Obama-Clark ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think Clark as VP would be an incredible waste of his creds.
If he's not president, then he should be secretary of state.

(He can't be Def. Sec. He has to be out of active-duty service for 10 years to do that and, in 2008, it will only be eight years out. It's federal law.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nah My guy for state is Bill Ruchardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Clark - Obama more like....
....but I think sadly that the colour of Obama's skin would outweigh any 'southern' votes the General would garner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I think you are wrong about Obama on two counts
First. The SOuth is used to African-American leadership particularly in the big cities. They have been electing blylacks to Mayors for years. And bluntly none are as articulate and charismatic as Obama. I suspect he will be viewd with more suspeicion from the black power structure in the south than from White Suburbanites.

The other thing is that Obama is Waaaaay to charismatic to play second fiddle. Its not about his ego as much as it is about the top of the ticket being outshone by his 100 watt personality and intellect.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. You may be right....But Obama needs to earn his bones first...
...and he's made far too many centrist noises for my liking....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. He has great political instincts...but you are right he is too green f
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 02:40 PM by Perky
for 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. He appears to have overlooked
Dean's 50-state strategy in his calculations. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. He did not say he was going to ignore blue states.
He simply said that we can't subcribe to an electoral calculus the says the Repukes win 32 states we get 16 and we hope things vbreak our way in Ohio or Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. My point was simply that ,
no matter who ends up as the Dem Pres candidate in '08, there will be a 50-state wide effort to get him/her elected thanks to Dean's strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Warner needs to learn that southern democrats
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 07:46 AM by mmonk
aren't southern republicans. No, don't forsake the south, but don't treat southern dems as if they have to be appeased or talked to as southern republicans. That has been the problem the whole time with a DLC approach to the south. Nearly all the old dixiecrats made the switch to the republican party a long time ago and it was more or less finalized through Reagan. Southern dems aren't different from dems elsewhere and you're not going to get fundamentalist republicans to vote for democrats. You need to solidfy the base and appeal to independents with good reasoning and ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. That Is A Most Cogent Point
I think there is actually a myth that there are southern democrats voting for republicans. The people voting for republicans in the south are just as much republicans as those who voted for Keyes or Silverspoon here in Illinois.

They're NOT democrats voting against their own interests because dems don't resonate. They are REPUBLICANS! Quit worrying about getting republicans to vote for democrats and just focus on standing for issues of interest to liberal leaning indepenents and dems.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good post and good replies thus far
Thanks for the interesting read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Warner is absolutely right and others have been saying this too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Oh God another MOR Dem about to ignore my state
worth more than most of the southern states. Time to take the Western states for granted... again.
Ps... Keep California a late primary so they don't get a say, only a "verify"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. Another voice from the "not as bad" wing of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC