Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Let's talk about Camus" "That was a couple of books ago"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:03 PM
Original message
"Let's talk about Camus" "That was a couple of books ago"
Brian Williams with the fool.

Talk about an existential response.

"I read three Shakespeare's, too"

I have been reading about that interview on DU all afternoon, but it was just so bizarre in color.

If the idiot hasn't had a stroke, then what the hell is it that makes him talk like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dick Clark talks like he had a stroke. Bush talks like a lying
idiot pretending to be many things he is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. "That was a couple of books ago."
In other words, he isn't able to retain any information for more than a few days at a time before he is in overload.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:12 PM
Original message
I know you don't believe that he actually read anything
Bush reading Camus and three Shakespeare plays??? Come on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. When I heard that Camus was on his summer reading list...
I almost wet myself.:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Existentialism? Isn't that some terraist group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Only if you believe I have a bridge over the East River I can sell you.
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. 3 'shakespeares" ??? who the hell ever reads shakespeare unless
you are into playwriting, acting or literature for its sake or in school and they make you.

3 shakespeares, thats not even a good attempt at a lie.

camus and 3 seuss' i might believe, if the camus was cliffs notes or a movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. He's probably decided to finally make up that homework
that he never turned in when he went AWOL from school.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gruenemann Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. Maybe he's talking about fishing reels. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone who believes Bush could make it through Shakespeare is a loon
Honestly, now...the man can't even read a Telepromptr -- even when the script is spelled out phonetically. It takes much more than reading to "read" Shakespeare. I wish Williams had had the cajones to ask him for some details about the bard's plays. I'd have love to heard those answers! Probably more difficult to comprehend than Coriolanus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah -- someboday ask him about The Mousetrap.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Don't you be dissin' my Agatha! It's far too advanced a mystery for
Idiot Son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Agatha took that name from the play within Hamlet --
which we are supposed to believe Junior has now read.

lol

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Williams had no follow-ups at all
We were just talking about this at our house.

Any follow-up would have probably killed the interview.

A one-on-one interview with the idiot must be akin to waltzing on marbles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosillies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I noticed the no follow-ups also.
I had a couple of thoughts:

He had so many things he wanted to slam and ridicule Bush on that he just had to rip right through them.

Or, he was afraid that if he pressed, Bush would get so pissed that his head would start spinning and then explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Or, the White House demanded a "no Follow-Up" rule before
allowing access to El Presidente Chucklenuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. When he talked about the Shakespeares, he was probably talking about
fishing gear...you know his best day as Pretzeldent was when he caught a fishy in his private lake at his private mansion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. You are probably 1 in a very few on DU who would make that connection
Shakespeares

I think that I may be in love...

I thought that I had hit the Big Time when I got my first Abu-Matic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. *lol* Was thinking about that as my hubby was prepping the rods/reels to
take the grandkids out fishing last weekend :-)
God knows the Imbecile can't REALLY read Shakespeare...nor much beyond his own name, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. No retention, huh?
Maybe he should start taking ritalin. That is, if it's compatible with his OTHER medications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. "3 Shakespeares" my ass you lying sack of shit.
Not even an 'epileptical' with exremely erudite tatses would read 3 Shakespeare plays in a row on a whim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. A tale told by an idiot...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
42. LOL!
That describes all of his interviews.

I have a degree in theater and even I don't read Shakespeare so casually. The WH PR machine is addicted to lying. I think it's all just a game to them to play and getting away with. Who will dare to question the King?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. and people who would be that focused would NOT call them "Shakespeares"
Even the slacker grad students I hang out with would be way more specific (e.g. "Macbeth", "Othello", and "The Tempest").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Trading cards! He sounds like he's 10 and talking about trading cards
I'll trade you two Marlowes for a Shakespeare.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I'll see you your Marlowes and raise you a Chaucer! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. exactly
or at least say three of the comedies or tragedies or histories. But three Shakespeares? I wish he would just shut up and stop embarassing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Maybe he meant "Three Mousketeers."
More believable than three Shakespeares!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Three "Cliff Notes" Shakespeare books...
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:00 PM by mcscajun
He really likes the black/yellow covers.

Oh! And someone must have told him about "Bushy" in "Richard II". Wasn't HE in for a surprise!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. I didn't know they had a "Shakespeare For Idiots"
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 08:44 PM by C_U_L8R
or a Camus for Dummies

or Macbeth for Morans

or Twelfth Night for Absolute Twits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. "Shakespeare for Dummies"? Absolutely!
They've got it! And the bullet points and bold print would SO appeal to Spongehead Dumbass.

# Paperback
# ISBN: 0764551353
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'd like to point something out here.
When Clinton's sex scandal was all the rage, one thing that was constantly being brought up was Clinton's lack of honesty. "What", asked the punditocracy, "does this suggest about his character, and his fitness for the Presidency"? Even if there was nothing illegal to be found, everyone was eager to point out that a lack of character on one issue might translate into a lack of character on a more profound level that could influence his work.

Bush tells obvious lies *all the time*. He's been caught in many- including one of the most damaging lie campaigns of the last 100 years- his lies to get us into Iraq.

And yet I never hear the punditocracy fixate on little moments like this one with his reading list. They never dwell on questions of character when it comes to Bush. They never ask what sort of man lies about the books he's reading, or how that sort of fundamental dishonesty must affect his work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. You nailed it. But I think this is such a case of the emperor
being naked that the press can't even go there. Once they point out the fundamental idiocy of this man, what we all know would be public -- we're being led by a moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. "They can lie with impunity," Rummy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
57. "punditocracy" excellent word! Did you coin it?
That's so good, it about says it all "in a word."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Nah, wish I could that I did- but I've seen it bobbing around in the
stew for awhile. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Shakespeares?"
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:35 PM by NightOwwl
Is that like the Internets?

God, what a fucking fuckwad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. were those Shakespeares 'to go'?
a la carte? al fresco? on the rocks? with ketchup?

I usually have mine with a twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. With a side order of Chaucer, LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sludge man Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. I read 3 Shakespeare's too
Shakespear
Shakespear
Shakespear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erinlough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. Here is a link to Camus discussion
http://www.levity.com/corduroy/camusabs.htm

do you really think Georgie read this? I think he asked Laura, "name me a book I kin tell that Brian guy I read". And, in an act of supreme vengeance she taught him to say "Camus".

Gotta love it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
36. It was pathetic.
One compares his response to RFK's frequent quoting of Camus in 1966-68. One reportedly read Camus; the other clearly understood Camus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
37. Christopher Hitchens said on Bill Maher Friday night
that he believed that Bush was dyslexic. If that's the case, I imagine he would have even more trouble with Shakespeare than with modern text.

P.S. De Vere was Shakespeare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Not necessarily. At least half of my Renaissance friends
are dyslexic or have some kind of learning difference.

P.S. That's just silly. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I'm no expert on dyslexia, so I won't argue the first point.
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 08:20 AM by soonerhoosier
But it is the Stratford myth that is silly. Walt Whitman, Henry James, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Mark Twain, Sigmund Freud, Orson Welles, and John Gielgud thought it was silly. So do Mark Rylance, artistic director of the Globe, and actors Michael York, Kenneth Branagh, and Derek Jacobi.

http://www.shakespearebyanothername.com/

http://www.shakespearefellowship.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. It's weird that people are always claiming that that upstart
belonged to the upper class. He would have enjoyed that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. That statement implies that authorship scholars believe that
only a member of the upper class could have written the plays. That is not the case. The authorship question asks "who did write them?"

There are mountains of evidence that it was Edward De Vere, but I won't argue the point any further. (At least not here.) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. The latest Smithsonian has a
pretty good article re. the Shakespeare controversy. The answer? Who knows for sure. Still a mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. The texts are more interesting to me than the author and maybe
that dates me. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
40. "Brush Up Your Shakespeare" — one of my favorite lyrics:
From "Kiss Me Kate" and sung by two gangsters:


The girls today in society
Go for classical poetry,
So to win their hearts one must quote with ease
Aeschylus and Euripides.
But the poet of them all
Who will start 'em simply ravin'
Is the poet people call
The bard of Stratford-on-Avon.

Brush up your Shakespeare,
Start quoting him now.
Brush up your Shakespeare
And the women you will wow.
Just declaim a few lines from "Othella"
And they think you're a heckuva fella.
If your blonde won't respond when you flatter 'er
Tell her what Tony told Cleopaterer,
And if still, to be shocked, she pretends well,
Just remind her that "All's Well That Ends Well."
Brush up your Shakespeare
And they'll all kowtow.

Brush up your Shakespeare,
Start quoting him now.
Brush up your Shakespeare
And the women you will wow.
If your goil is a Washington Heights dream
Treat the kid to "A Midsummer Night Dream."
If she fights when her clothes you are mussing,
What are clothes? "Much Ado About Nussing."
If she says your behavior is heinous
Kick her right in the "Coriolanus."
Brush up your Shakespeare
And they'll all kowtow,
And they'll all kowtow,
And they'll all kowtow.

Brush up your Shakespeare,
Start quoting him now.
Brush up your Shakespeare
And the women you will wow.

Brush up your Shakespeare
And they'll all kowtow,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. Um, does he realize that each of these "Shakespeares" are plays and...
...not full-fledged "books" in the way novels or non-fiction are? Hell, even The Stranger is actually just a novella rather than a novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. It's contagious. This morning the host of WJ called them
"Shakespeare books". :wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
46. Brian Williams: Let's talk about Camus...
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 09:03 AM by Crankie Avalon
Chimp: It's all about the existentialism, Brian.

Brian Williams: What does "existentialism" mean in the 21st Century, and what is the relationship between existentialism and how you view the world?

Chimp: Yeah, existentialism is exactly that...it's existential. You...exist...and are viewed as an existing entity. (laughter emanates from audience) Therefore, the relationship between you and the rest of the world is one between...existing entities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. good gawd. Was this before or after he mentioned his "epileptic"
choices in reading?

He's his own Abbott and Costello routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. EPILEPTIC Reading!! ROTFLMAO!
The man is trying to be as intellectuals as the Internets. It probably puts him into convlusions. Leave the poor baby alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. THIS, I believe . . .
Is it a transcript? (I missed the interview)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. No, it's not. But hard to tell, no?
Sounds like a satire written by the poster, mocking one of Bush's answers on Native American sovereignty (I believe) a few months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. And sovereignty is sovereign
yeah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
55. As my husband put it after we listened to this interview
"Camus, Shakespeare? I read those in high school and he's just getting around to them?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. So, he's admitted that his intellectual level has now reached
slightly post-pubescent.

But, of course, he's lying about this supposed reading list, so I can now only guess that he ASPIRES to a slightly post-pubescent intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Slightly post-pubescent
is a step up from his usual juvenile intellect. I have to confess that I screamed at the televison that reading the Classic Comicbooks versions of Shakespeare didn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protagoras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
61. does anyone believe he read KAMUUS?
even the more die-hard repugs I know roll their eyes at this latest "I'm really into the classics" PR blitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
62. He just needed a tune-up before the
new Thomas Pynchon novel is released near the end of the year.

Against the Day
A variety of rumors pertaining to the subject matter of Pynchon's next book have circulated over a number of years. Most specific of these were comments made by the former German minister of culture, Michael Naumann, who stated that he assisted Pynchon in his research about "a Russian mathematician studied for David Hilbert in Göttingen", and that the new novel would trace the life and loves of Sofia Kovalevskaya. A July 2006 press release from Penguin Press placed the new novel's publication date as 5 December 2006 (Getlin 2006), and the as yet-untitled book was listed on Amazon.com as 992 pages in length. It was subsequently reported that the release date for the novel had been moved forward to 21 November and that the novel would be 1040 pages long.

A synopsis written by Pynchon himself appeared in July 2006 and was posted on Amazon, stating that the novel's action takes place between the 1893 Chicago World's Fair and the time immediately following World War I, which would seem to rule out Kovalevskaya as the protagonist, as she had died in 1891. "With a worldwide disaster looming just a few years ahead," Pynchon writes in his Book Description, "it is a time of unrestrained corporate greed, false religiosity, moronic fecklessness, and evil intent in high places. No reference to the present day is intended or should be inferred." He promises cameos by Nikola Tesla, Bela Lugosi and Groucho Marx, as well as "stupid songs" and "strange sexual practices" (Pynchon 2006). Subsequently, the title of the new book was reported as Against the Day and a Penguin spokesperson confirmed that the synopsis was Pynchon's (Patterson 2006b; Italie 2006).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Pynchon

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
63. Why the F is the president reading books anyway?
reading books is a LEISURE activity. i barely have time to read books, and my job isn't nearly as demanding as the presidents.

hey frat boy, maybe you should dig the nation out of the iraq shaped hole you put us in before you take the time to read. put aside 1 of these books & call bashir al assad instead. he'll take the call.

jesus freaking christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. He should have read all the books he mentions a long time ago.
Andover and Yale and he's never read Camus or Shakespeare before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. i completely agree!
where's he finding the time? you don't just speed read works like those.

and who really believes him, i mean really? this is bush we're talking about, for christ's sake! just another big lie as far as i'm concerned. first he's the common man, then he's the intellectual. but he's neither one.

oh, i just figured it out. he does have plenty of time because it's so much more time consuming to be constructive than destructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
66. He probably reads the Cliff notes
Seriously, how would George find time to read all these books - he's always riding his bike, and he goes to bed at 10. Or maybe he does the books on tape thing, listening while jetting off to his next political speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. If anything, he MAY have watched the movies
"I really liked the sad one where the 16-year-old girl showed her titties."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC