Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Options In The Mid East Amount to Choice Number 1, 2 or 3.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:05 PM
Original message
US Options In The Mid East Amount to Choice Number 1, 2 or 3.....
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 05:05 PM by leftchick
I am betting on number three. They are hell bent on their third war in Iran....

US vs. Iran: Is an attack inevitable?

<snip>

US Options

No US administration has ever damaged United States’ interests so heavily and in such a short time as Bush’s administration. This administration has managed to alienate over 1 billion Muslims around the world. It has alienated Europeans, Africans, and Asians. It has used threat of force to force nations into submission, and instead of wining friends has created enemies across the globe. Russia, China, Iran and Venezuela are just to mention a few countries, out of fear (for details read “Cold War II”) are trying their utmost to make sure that US doesn’t get any stronger.

This has left US with few options. Having destroyed the balance of power in the Middle East, it is left with either accepting the new arrangement, or throw the whole world into an unimaginable economic chaos.

US has three options: (1) Withdraw from Iraq, (2) make a grand bargain with Iran, or (3) attack Iran.

1. The first option is a huge strategic defeat for the US; something that will affect all the countries in the Middle East. A US withdrawal is tantamount to a defeat. The US clients having backed the US against the will of their populations will have to make a U-turn making similar security deals with Iran, ensuring an even greater strategic rise in the Iranian power.


2. US can not/will not come to terms with Iran. United States, after spending billions of dollars, not to mention the thousands of American dead and wounded wants to have economic and strategic compensation. Iran does not accept US hegemony and demands security guarantees from US that it will not in the future invade Iran; something that US doesn’t want to give. There is also the matter of Israel. Iran has become the centre of the Islamic and Arab world. Muslims now look to Iran to protect the interest of the Palestinians. A grand bargain would also mean that Israel has to vacate the occupied lands and return to its 1967 borders, something that the US Jewish lobby does not accept.


3. This leaves US with only one choice: weaken/isolate Iran first (if possible) and then attack it. All the talk about NPT and uranium enrichment etc is geared towards this end.

http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Egypt/202396
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. option nr 3 is the most likely
historically bullies act that way. But that means their fall. Prepare for the collapse of the USA within the coming 5 years. Just pray to skip the radioactive ashes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and I have two children.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1. is inevitable; 2. is already a de facto reality; 3. is psywar
1. Does anyone seriously think that in five years we're going to have anything more than a token military force inside Iraq?

2. The moment we overthrew Saddam Hussein we guaranteed that Iran would extend something approaching sovereignty over Shi'a southern Iraq.

3. If you think that the Iraq War has been costly, think times ten or times 100 to get into a full-fledged war with Iran. For what? Are U.S. troops going to occupy Khuzistan? Saddam tried and was pushed out after a couple years and half a million Iraqi casualties. Oh yes, there's the nuclear option. Does anyone seriously think we're going to drop H-bombs on Iran and gain something from it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am afraid the neocons including rummy see nukes as a positive
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wall Street doesn't see the use of nukes as a net-positive.
Don't forget who's really in charge of this Administration.

It isn't the neo-cons. It's bankers. What do you think is going to happen to the Dow if H-bombs start going off in the oil patch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wish I shared your optimism
neo-cons have ruled since 2001 along with some corporate cronies. I can't see them changing their agenda now no matter who is trying to scream sense at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm not really an optimist. I just don't think Wall St. is suicidal or
stupid. There's still too much of a fixed investment in this place, and all the infrastructure and trading networks that feed into it are too fragile, to let the crazies really destroy things on a big scale again.

My biggest fear is that -- if the US doesn't turn around soon -- there may eventually be a big push to liquidate what's left of America as part of a giant corporate restructuring, with the capital assets being moved off-shore.

Once the real value is liquidated, it might make sense to blow things up.

I'd hope that the U.S. military brass and intel wouldn't have anything to do with that. Maybe I am a bit of an optimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrak Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. This administration (in a short frickin time)...
has managed to alienate over 1 billion Muslims around the world. It has alienated Europeans, Africans, and Asians. It has used threat of force to force nations into submission, and instead of wining friends has created enemies across the globe. Russia, China, Iran and Venezuela are, just to mention a few countries, out of fear (for details read “Cold War II”) are trying their utmost to make sure that US doesn’t get any stronger.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC