Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hard Core Young Voter Organizing Discussion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Prank Monkey Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 02:56 PM
Original message
Hard Core Young Voter Organizing Discussion
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 02:57 PM by Prank Monkey
If you are involved in young voter organizing, or have experience in it, I invite you to check out this discussion on Future Majority. Spectators also welcome.

A conversation began on Future Majority a few weeks ago about the effectiveness of Music for America's model for reaching and activating young voters. It started here, with a segment of Alex's thesis devoted to his experience volunteering with MFA in 2004. Both MFA's executive and communications directors posted replies to Alex. It continued here, in a response Alex wrote. In the comments section, a conversation evolved between Alex, myself, and Mark Ristaino, MFA's current communications director, about the problems with MFA's organizational model and execution (disclosure - I'm MFA's founding communications director but have not officially worked at the organization for over a year and a half, though I do give advice occasionally).

This is an important conversation. MFA has a list of 70,000 young voters. They've been present at over 4,000 music events since October 2003 and registered approximately 20,000 young voters. No other organization dedicated to engaging Millenials/"Echo-Boomers" is more integrated within the fabric of youth culture and touches so many people on a nightly basis.

Yet in many ways the organization is dysfunctional. There are problems with the volunteer process, little cohesion to MFA as a movement, and for many volunteers it is a dead-end, providing no way to move further into the ranks of the progressive movement. As a result, to quote Mark "employees and young activists and partner bands start to get disillusioned with politics due to MFA."

This post is an effort to keep this conversation going. As I noted above, MFA is uniquely positioned to reach young voters in the 2008 Presidential cycle. Parts of it are broken, but I hope that it is fixable. Below the jump I've summarized the conversation thus far, and I invite readers to contribute their own ideas. We have a rare chance here to openly discuss with the current leadership of MFA ways to correct the course of the organization well in advance of 2008, when once again MFA could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election.

As Alex noted in his thesis, this is not meant to as an attack on Music for America or any of the other groups that worked extremely hard during the election, but a critical critique of the problems people face when they attempt to become more involved. If we are to regain majority status in this nation we have to look at ourselves with extremely critical eyes.

Join the conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC