Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well... At Least PorkBusters Has My Two Senators In The Clear !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:42 PM
Original message
Well... At Least PorkBusters Has My Two Senators In The Clear !!!


<snip>

Who is the secret holder?

Senators Tom Coburn and Barak Obama have proposed S.2590, legislation that would create a single website with access to information on nearly all recipients of federal funding. The bill cannot proceed, however, because one or more Senators placed a "secret hold" on it.

Who is the secret holder? We want to know, and we want your help finding out. Call your Senator, and ask them to go on the record denying that they placed the hold. Then e-mail Porkbusters and let us know what they said! Senators who issue denials will be removed from the suspect list --- and those who do not, won't!

<snip>

Link (Pic Heavy): http://porkbusters.org/secrethold.php

Have your Senators cleared themselves yet?

Found out about this site here: http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001428.php

Pressure people... PRESSURE!!!

:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are a lot of Dems on the list of unknowns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Including Schumer...Grrr
It's late now, but if he isn't cleared by office hours I'll start banging on his door... (figuratively speaking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's good news about our Senators.
But I despise Tom Coburn. He is my in-laws' rep, and there is no better anti-reproductive-rights sexist on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh... Coburn's A MAJOR POS, But I Want S.2590 Passed !!!
And I want to out the "Secret Holder"!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're right. That jerk should be outed (n/t)!
Edited on Mon Aug-28-06 11:20 PM by Maat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. My Money's On Stevens or Byrd
Some pigs are more equal than others. Stevens and his "bridge to nowhere" and Byrd are the top porkers of each party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I just LOVE the rationale for this bill from a repuke-- especially how
he conflated planned parenthood and the sierra club with that puke stevens' "bridge to nowhere".
very interesting indeed.




"For the first time, it would shed some light on which companies and organizations are receiving federal money, and how much they are getting. A tool like this is a dream come true for budget hawks. Louis Brandeis famously observed that `sunlight is the best disinfectant' -- and nothing needs disinfecting like the festering federal budget. Many taxpayers would be surprised and disturbed to learn how much of their money drifts quietly away to various questionable causes -- Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club, Alaskan bridges to nowhere, and the like. Making this information readily available to the public -- and especially to the diligent denizens of the blogosphere -- would encourage reform...It would bring about a systematic, strategic advantage -- rather than just an isolated triumph -- for proponents of spending cuts. While it isn't enough by itself to restore sensible spending to Washington, it would strongly encourage lawmakers to exercise integrity in their oversight of the federal purse."

(gee, considering it's the repukes doing most of the spending these days, one doesn't quite understand their eagerness to see the bill passed--unless they think it will only apply to LIBERAL entities.)


http://www.gopprogress.com/story/2006/8/25/9753/25337
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC