Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:27 AM
Original message
President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws
Edited on Mon Aug-28-06 11:29 AM by LSK

President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws

July 30, 1996
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.

snip

One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."


http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/

There seems to be a movie coming out on ABC blaming 9/11 on Clinton. I offer up this little gem from history in an effort debunking the claims that Clinton did nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton? 1996? nt
Edited on Mon Aug-28-06 11:28 AM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can't really blame him
He might not have a completely compliant congress for too much longer.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Clinton 1996 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent!
While Bill worried about terrorist the congress worried about a stained blue dress. This has all come back to bite them in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Republican lawmakers hardened stance against anti-terrorism measures"
Freakin' terrorist sympathizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obviously the Republicans in Congress in 1996 weren't all that worried
about terrorism.

Why do they hate America? And for over 10 years, yet! Evil bastards!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes please hurry. You're about to lose your majority.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. problems with the president's proposals to expand wiretapping.(Hatch)
Hatch blasts 'phony' issues

Republican leaders earlier met with White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta for about an hour in response to the president's call for "the very best ideas" for fighting terrorism.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get."

Hatch called Clinton's proposed study of taggants -- chemical markers in explosives that could help track terrorists -- "a phony issue."

"If they want to, they can study the thing" already, Hatch asserted. He also said he had some problems with the president's proposals to expand wiretapping.

Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-South Dakota, said it is a mistake if Congress leaves town without addressing anti-terrorism legislation. Daschle is expected to hold a special meeting on the matter Wednesday with Congressional leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wish I can find an article on Clinton wanting to go after bin Laden-
Edited on Mon Aug-28-06 11:47 AM by GreenTea
tried a Google search, couldn't find anything...Randi speaks of it all the time and mentions how the republicans said he was just trying to divert attention from Monica and bin Laden really wasn't no threat...fucking republicans...Anybody have a link?

It would be powerful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. U.S. missiles pound targets in Afghanistan, Sudan
Edited on Mon Aug-28-06 11:56 AM by LSK

U.S. missiles pound targets in Afghanistan, Sudan
Retaliation for bombing of U.S. embassies in eastern Africa


August 20, 1998

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Saying "there will be no sanctuary for terrorists," President Clinton on Thursday said the U.S. strikes against terrorist bases in Afghanistan and a facility in Sudan are part of "a long, ongoing struggle between freedom and fanaticism."

snip

American cruise missiles pounded sites in Afghanistan and Sudan Thursday in retaliation for the August 7 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

U.S. officials say the six sites attacked in Afghanistan were part of a network of terrorist compounds near the Pakistani border that housed supporters of Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden.

snip

In Afghanistan, a spokesman for the ruling Taliban, Mullah Abdullah, said that "bin Laden is safe and no damage has been done to any of his companions." Bin Laden has been living in Afghanistan with the permission of the Taliban, a fundamentalist Islamic group that controls most of the country.




http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.01/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Kick & Recommend. Yes, it would be great to find more of these articles.
The Osama one would be excellent!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Send this article to ABC - tell them we REJECT THEIR LIES.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Snopes
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.htm

Claim: The Clinton administration failed to track down the perpetrators of several terrorist attacks against Americans.

Status: False.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'm suprised Snopes didn't do their usual thing
which is debunk, but attack Dems anyway, and defend Bush.

Such as "But Clinton still probably could have done more, and Bush doesn't get the credit he deserves for fighting terror".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Tell that to GD ABC!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. ABC-Disney owned & huge republican party donor (millions) doing a hatchet
job on President Clinton to protect Bush and help the republicans in November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. and Sandy Berger's briefing to Rice January 2001....
which they completely ignored!

"I'm coming to this briefing to underscore how important I think this subject is. I believe that the Bush Administration will spend more time on terrorism generally, and on al-Qaeda specifically, than any other subject."

— Clinton National Security Adviser SANDY BERGER, to Condi Rice, January 2001

http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020812/story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC