Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flight Lands In Newark After Dynamite Found In Luggage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:11 PM
Original message
Flight Lands In Newark After Dynamite Found In Luggage
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 02:17 PM by im10ashus
WHY wasn't this luggage checked BEFORE it was allowed onto the plane.



A college student's checked luggage on a Continental Airlines flight to Houston from Argentina on Friday contained dynamite, and federal authorities are investigating why he had it and what he intended to do with it, an FBI spokeswoman said.

"Certainly we are doing a thorough investigation and trying to find out what this individual's intention was in trying to bring dynamite here," FBI spokeswoman Shauna Dunlap said Friday.

The dynamite was found during a luggage search in a federal inspection station at Bush Intercontinental Airport shortly after Continental Flight 52 landed about 6 a.m. Friday. Marlene McClinton, spokeswoman for the Houston Airport System, said a bomb-sniffing dog "had a hit" on explosive residue during a further search.

She said Customs and Border Patrol and the FBI shut down the customs area and began questioning the passenger who had the luggage. The identity and age of the passenger, a man, were not released.

cont'd...

http://www.wnbc.com/news/9738887/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. weird n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link, please? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oops!
Sorry. It's fixed.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Thanks! I wanted to send this on which is why I needed the linkie.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. NakedAir could be a real successful business venture. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aceman2373 Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow....
Maybe the airport people are doing something good. Looks like they are on the ball, or at least starting to be. Maybe the new security precautions are working...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I would hope so and that it wasn't just a fluke
I hate to say it, but I am also skeptical - why dynamite and did he have any way of setting it off?

I guess because I knew someone in college who had an alarmclock that looked like a bundle of dynamite, and he got arrested, then later cleared after they discovered it was not real. The initial arrest was on the TV, the correction and release were not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. WTF? Dynamite? Who uses dynamite anymore? Do we even mfg it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Dynamite still works just fine
It has many industrial and mining operations.

It's safe to handle and predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. I thought Dow stopped making it.
Because other explosives had come out that were just as or more stable and cheaper.

Stupid history channel! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I saw a show on the Hitler Channel recently that discussed dynamite
As well as other explosives. I find the subject fascinating.

I think you are thinking of DuPont BTW. Several companies still make nytroglycerin-based explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Ahhhhhhhh...
Thanks.

You're a fountain of info as usual slack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. " I find the subject fascinating"
Well your on a watch list now. :eyes: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. As a Federal Firearms License holder who has worked for banks
And had a military security clearance, I'm already on plenty of watch lists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush Intercontinental is in Houston, not Newark (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. They found it AFTER the plane landed?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. International flight
Blame Argentina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why would anyone carry dynamite??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Probably a freeper
He didn't have enough brains to blow his nose, and you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. You carry dynamite to get it from one place to another
Of course it turns out there was no actual dynamite involved in this incident.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. LOL
oh gosh, I need to go home...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. Because neither FedEx nor UPS Will Ship It
Not even by over night express ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here we go again.......
I expect to see stories like this hyped until November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Might be something more like an M-80, it looks like dynamite if
one is not familiar with what dynamite looks like? Just askin??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. We are not safe flying if they can overlook DYNAMITE in luggage.
This is happening almost five years after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Without a detonator, dynamite is very stable and safe
Unless it has been stored improperly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. That's completely beside the point.
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 02:44 PM by Selatius
If he could get that on board--through freaking luggage no less--then how much harder would it be for somebody with truly ill intentions to attach a detonator and timer and repeat Pan-Am Flight 103 tragedy when it blew up over Lockerbie, Scotland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. But he DIDN'T take any dynamite on board.
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 02:43 PM by slackmaster
Read the article carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Still beside the point.
The fact that any explosive got on board the plane at all is worry enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. There wasn't any explosive on board
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 02:46 PM by slackmaster
Explosive residue != explosive. You have to have a certain amount of any explosive in order to produce an explosion at all.

If you are arguing that the residue should have been detected before the flight took off, direct your ire toward Argentina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. It's such a poorly written article, and misleading, in fact.
It states:

The dynamite was found during a luggage search in a federal inspection station at Bush Intercontinental Airport shortly after Continental Flight 52 landed about 6 a.m. Friday. Marlene McClinton, spokeswoman for the Houston Airport System, said a bomb-sniffing dog "had a hit" on explosive residue during a further search.

Then follows it up with:

Houston Fire Department Assistant Chief Omero Longoria said the man told fire officials that he works in mining and often handles explosives, so that would explain the residue. He said federal officials were investigating whether the man's explanation was true, and the fire department's role in the probe ended upon determining the man's bag did not contain a bomb.

So which is it, federal inspectors? Dynamite or residue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Yeah, no Pulitzer prize for the clowns who wrote and edited it
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. On the plus side, passengers taking the same flight were relieved
of their shampoo and nail polish remover before boarding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't suppose it was Miss
Dynamite ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just read it -- it was RESIDUE....
"Houston Fire Department Assistant Chief Omero Longoria said the man told fire officials that he works in mining and often handles explosives, so that would explain the residue. He said federal officials were investigating whether the man's explanation was true, and the fire department's role in the probe ended upon determining the man's bag did not contain a bomb."

:eyes:

And apparently they found it AFTER the plane landed in Houston, coming in from Argentina. It went on to Newark, but after landing there they decided to do "additional security screening."

In other words, a whole lot of nonsense!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. D'Oh!!!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Insanity ensues.
Who's running security? The Keystone Cops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Two scoops of fear with some dread sprinkles. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Truly.
And the article states at one point that it was dynamite and then later says it was only residue. I'm telling ya, the Keystone Cops are running the airport security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. At least they only work security and not piano moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Laurel and Hardy would be a welcome relief.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
49. on the upside
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 03:47 PM by leftchick
the all terra channels got to have TERRA TERRA IN THE SKYS all day on TV for the all TERRA Administration!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why the fuss? It wasn't shampoo in his hand luggage, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. So how exactly do they search the luggage while in flight?
I don't believe this shit for a minute. The "terrorist" reports get more and more outrageous every day. And there are literally two or three every day. It's probably going to stay this way until Election Day. That could work to our advantage. People will eventually tired of being scared by the GOP. If they over do it they lose the effect.



Liberal bumper stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. They didn't
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 02:57 PM by slackmaster
The article is very poorly written.

The luggage was probably being screened for illegal drugs by a multi-purpose dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
41. Photo of the passenger who had the residue in his luggage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Ow...
There's now grapefruit juice in my sinuses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. If this is so, then why was the baggage allowed onto the plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Argentine authorities must not have used bomb-sniffing dogs
:shrug:

This is really a tempest in a teapot. The passengers and crew of the plane were never in any danger from the residue on someone's luggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. Article has been updated, now says "a stick" of dynamite
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 05:55 PM by slackmaster
http://www.wnbc.com/news/9738887/detail.html

Simplest explanation: DUMBASS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. No longer just residue.
Tell me again who is in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. The government of Argentina
Would be responsible for screening baggage leaving Buenos Aires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
52. they're just making up crap right and left aren't they?
absolutely no excuse to be reporting that dynamite was found when no dynamite was found, absolutely none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC