|
Venezuela, Iraq War/Middle East, Israel/Palestine, peace movement, ELECTION REFORM (fab posts!), activist news of all kinds (that's what I'm most interested in--how the people are saving the democracy). DU is a little chaotic, but VERY informative--not to mention the education you get in the comments!
Google News is a good supplement--it has the GREAT practice of posting news from numerous sources around the world--hundreds of different news organizations per story. So you can learn how news is being reported in farflung areas. Don't like the corporates spin here? Find different spin! And even leftist spin!
Asia Times is another good supplement--an area of the world poorly covered by DUers, and poorly covered generally in our media. AT is excellent on Asia AND U.S. issues. (Read Pepe Escobar!)
Scoop.com is also good. (New Zealand--but it's where the U.S. '04 exit polls were first analyzed--Autorank is now writing for them on election issues.)
A couple of other sites I keep up with, that have a broad range of leftist opinion and real news: Truthout.org, Bradblog, FreePress.org, Counterpunch. AND, www.venezuelanalysis.com (excellent on Venez and other So. Amer. matters--haven't found a comparable site on Mexico, but Judy Lynn's posts on Mexico here at DU pretty much fill us in. Narconews has been great on the Mexican election.)
Dubious: DailyKos. I really can't get past the "Iron Curtain" they pulled down over Election Fraud news. What it told me is that they're trying to please the powers that be in the Democratic Party--so, although they've done some good stories, how can we trust their perspective, their editing, their focus? The Democratic Party leaders can be VERY WRONG, as we know.
Corporate news:
Any Knight-Ridder newspaper--the only good news service in this country. (--but the rightwing corporate raid might affect them, leaving us with NO good news service; Miami Herald has been good, but just published a shill piece dissing the Cuba/Venezuela doctors program--to please their new masters? dunno.)
Reuters, BBC and the International Herald Tribune: They try to be more neutral than our ridiculous corporate news monopolies. IHT can be quite good.
Read with caution: The WSJ *NEWS* section--not editorial (rabid Bush monkeys). The WSJ does fairly well on straight news. Investors have to have reliable news--I guess that's why. The L.A. Times news section sometimes has surprisingly good, in-depth reporting.
To hell with NYT: What they did on the war is so bad, they cannot be trusted on ANY story of ANY kind.
|