Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brooklyn Man Arrested For Providing 'HezbollahTV'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 10:57 AM
Original message
Brooklyn Man Arrested For Providing 'HezbollahTV'
FBI: Brooklyn HDTV company provided users with 'Hezbollah TV'

RAW STORY
Published: Thursday August 24, 2006

Javed Iqbal, a.k.a. "John Iqbal," 42, of Staten Island, N.Y., has been arrested and charged with conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), RAW STORY has learned.

A complaint announced today by the FBI alleges that through a company called HDTV Ltd. located in Brooklyn, Iqbal and others provided customers in the New York area with satellite broadcasts of al Manar, which is a television station owned and/or operated by Hezbollah.

The Department of Treasury named al Manar as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity" in March 2006, thereby making it a crime to, among other things, engage in business transactions with al Manar. In conjunction with the arrest, agents executed search warrants at both HDTV's Brooklyn office and Iqbal's Staten Island residence where, it is alleged, Iqbal maintained several satellite dishes.

Iqbal was arrested Wednesday.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/FBI_Brooklyn_HDTV_company_provided_users_0824.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, we certainly wouldn't want America to hear the other side of
the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winter999 Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Does that mean you'd be OK with a KKK channel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. More okay than I would be with one being censored.
Yes. They have a right to free speech, as much as anyone else. If they're breaking the law, then prosecute them for that. But expressing an opinion- even a noxious one- is protected by the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to respond.
Some people just can't have their rights taken away fast enough it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. No, they want their rights. Every single one....
They just don't think that you, I, or others should have any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanus Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah that's right
Just a couple of weeks ago I learned that there even was a Hezbollah TV. I didn't even know we had banned TV stations in the US.

Broadcasting news and\or opinion isn't illegal. But of course if they lie or slander or something, take them to court.

So weird. I swear I'm gonna wake up in a few minutes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. It should be legal to have a KKK channel,
though of course I wouldn't want a cable provider to offer one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Free Speech is also for views you don't agree with...
Thats the messy part of living in a free country.

Hezbollah TV, KKK TV?

You bet. I don't have to watch the shit. But why, in a free country, should they be banned, or censored?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think such channels even when spewing hate
would serve more to expose the horror of their beliefs to the masses than be a danger to the masses. Information is power. How it is used is up to the individual. I suspect more people exposed to such hate speech would serve to educate more people on the absurdity of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. They do have KKK TV and Radio
They just operate under assumed names.
Listen to Rush, Savage, or any other right wing hate channel or radio station.

Oh, you already do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Are you OK with CNN? How 'bout MSNBC? And Fox?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It's not the "side" but the visuals they want to surpress
90% of our learning is visual and TV images have incredible power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. So then you think that censorship is ok in this instance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Me? No! Good Lord!
But I'm pointing out their rationale. They have been so careful to hide images of flag covered coffins and disabled vets. Basically, the MSM has a narrative to tell and it doesn't involve showing the real results of war, except in very sanitized circumstances. The Vietnam protests were fueled by televisions images, especially on color TVs which had just come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yeah, you are on point with that.
The thing that concerns me about this story is it makes it hard to continue to claim that we really do have a free press in this country. And I would like to think that we do but instances like this an the items you point out make it next to impossible to continue to make that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Reminds me of Putin accusing Bush of firing Dan Rather
In an indirect way, Junior actually did.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. shutting down a broadcast?
guess freedom of speech is on the *to do* list for the feds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. They hate our FREEDOMS!
Say it wih me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is darn scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. The thought police strike again
The guys who wrote the Bill of Rights knew that all political ideas should be allowed to stand or fall on their own merits. That's why freedom of the press works.

The fascist core of BushCo shows it's colors again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is despicable. The US govt has no right to call a TV
station a terrorist organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well, if it's true that Al Manar is a Hezbollah-owned group, then
the law should apply. It would be no different than prosecuting businessmen who did business with the Nazi 3rd Reich.

However, if this guy got busted for broadcasting Al Jazeera or Al Arabiya, then the feds trampled on 1st Amendment rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. They are immune from wiretapping judgements but this
guy has to go down for practicing his 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. fascists fear ideas
they always fight them with book burnings, control of the press, propaganda.
that's why freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy.

and that's why freedom of speech was one of the first things taken from us, by project mockingbird and FauxNews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC