Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Lamont Nearly Even With Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:02 AM
Original message
NYT: Lamont Nearly Even With Lieberman
Filed at 4:47 p.m. ET

HARTFORD, Connecticut (Reuters) - U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's lead over anti-war challenger Ned Lamont has narrowed to a razor-thin margin, two polls showed on Wednesday.

The 2000 vice presidential candidate lost the Democratic primary vote in Connecticut to Lamont this month, but is running for re-election as an independent in a contest that has exposed deep divisions over the unpopular Iraq war.

An American Research Group poll conducted Thursday through Monday said the race was a statistical tie, putting Lieberman's support among 790 likely voters at 44 percent versus 42 percent for Lamont, a political novice and wealthy cable TV executive.

Republican Alan Schlesinger, a former state legislator, had 3 percent. The poll had a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

Another poll of 500 likely voters by Rasmussen Reports showed Lieberman's lead over Lamont narrowing to two points, 45 percent to 43 percent, from five points in an August 12 poll. Its margin of error was 4.5 percentage points.

MORE >>>

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-usa-politics-lieberman.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I almost feel sorry for Schlesinger
He could possibly be at a negative 0.5 points. :)

You know, if I hadn't been following this story, and I only knew the very basics of it - incumbent senator loses primary and runs as an independent, I wouldn't think too much of it. At least I wouldn't until I learned that he was going around campaigning with members of the opposition party. Just those two facts tell you that he's incredibly desperate to hold onto power, and he's incredibly stupid to think that what he's doing won't turn off voters.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That poor guy - I know! Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. We can assume that most of Lamont's is from Democratic voters?
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 09:35 AM by kentuck
If 60% of the total voters in CT lean Democratic, that would mean he was getting over two-thirds of the Democratic voters if his total is now 42%. That means Joe Lieberman is getting about 30% of the Democratic voters and the remainder of his lead is from Republican voters. That is why Joe is trying to shore up his "Democratic" base. If he continues to lose support of his own Party at the present pace, he would be irrelevant in two or three more weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is very bad
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lamont is gaining on him and FAST. This is GOOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. For whom? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC