Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The U.S. is being OUT-NEGOTIATED by Iran in the U.N.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:16 PM
Original message
The U.S. is being OUT-NEGOTIATED by Iran in the U.N.
Iran has lined up one hell of a negotiation stall. What happens on Aug. 31 when Iran doesn't comply with the U.N. demand to stop enriching uranium? Nothing. There is no immediate action along with the U.N. resolution, no sanctions, no military action.

Iran has put forward enough of a concession in their latest communication with the U.N. that there is enough for China and Russia to say "Whoa, Iran is willing to talk, let's not rush to action...". While Bolton has been belligerently badgering the U.N., Iran has been secretly negotiating with China and Russia on what they would need to stall any U.N. sanctioned action. Based on statements coming out of Russia and China, it appears they will resist any efforts to put action above continued negotiation. That means, if BushCo really wants what they've been pursuing, they will have to go without the U.N.

And I believe BushCo will go it alone, even if it risks retaliatory action by the U.N. I can see why many believe Israel's invasion of Lebanon was an experiment orchestrated by the U.S. to see how the U.N. would treat an overaggressive, misdirected response to a much lesser threat. What will the U.N. do when the U.S. starts bombing Iran? Will Russia and China get involved? Much of their oil comes from Iran and they've been all to eager to sell military grade equipment to Iran.

I dread that we will all know what the answer to that question much sooner than we would like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Russia and China don't need to believe shit about Iran's willingness
China wants to protect it's stake in the great game, and Russia wants to maintain access to the Indian Ocean. Remember Iran was a hugely important part of their ability to handle logistics during WWII. The Russians don't want to be encircled and until the Arctic Ocean is free of ice during January and February they'll do their damnedest to have some southern access.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not saying they would "believe" anything... I think the three are
working together to keep any sort of U.N. sanctioned action against Iran from happening. While the U.S. has been busy bullying the U.N., Iran has been creating an alliance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well I'm not saying you did...but if you look at what you posted...
There is certainly an implication that Russia and China are responding to Iran's communications. ..."Iran has put forward enough of a concession in their latest communication with the U.N. that there is enough for China and Russia to say "Whoa, Iran is willing to talk, let's not rush to action..."

My point is that Russia and China have their own reasons for supporting Iran in the UN and it has nothing to do with what Iran communicates to the U.N. Rather it has to do with supporting their nation's interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gula Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yep, One more shock and awe that has misfired.
More seriously: which country:
1. has started a devastating illegal war within the last few years?
2. has totally abandoned diplomacy?
3. is on the brink of bankrupcy?
4, has become a terrifying joke on the international scene?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, and it goes deeper than that...
Cheney and his staff of maniacs have completely altered the manner in which intelligence gets vetted. Now, instead of passing verifiable intel through the proper channels (CIA primarily), they send unverfiable information obtained either through torture or from "dissidents".

Why am I bringing this up? Because the main source of Iranian intel is Ahmed Chalabi and his cronies....AHMED CHALABI IS AN IRANIAN SPY!

Sorry for the caps...it pisses me off.

So Iran gets to feed any line of bullshit it wants directly to our executive branch and our dumb and/or evil leaders buy all of it.

This is all in Sy Hersch's book "Chain of Command" if you want to learn more,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, bullshit. The Iranians are in their last throes
Thats what UncaDick told me anyway. And UncaDick doesn't lie. Much.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is interesting to see Iran using the same tactics the US has used
at the UN. Iran has learned well, it seems. There has to be a great level of frustration for the bush cabal to see them selves "hoisted on their own petard", as it were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Their key is to never concede anything ever
All conceding got Saddam was a lot of grief.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Iran is certainly doing it with more "nuance", in terms of both their
responses and their alliances in the UN. Having two countries with veto power, China and Russia, urging restraint at the UN is certainly beneficial to Iran, not to mention having signed various agreements with them beforehand.

Iran may be many things to many people but, one thing is for sure, they cannot be classified as "slow learners".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC