Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't understand the Hillary for President talk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:01 PM
Original message
I don't understand the Hillary for President talk
I like her..... I used to love her.
My wife and I even named our first born daughter Chelsea. (Who just turned 5 years old yesterday!)

But when Hillary said we need MORE troops in Iraq she lost me. I live in New York and may cast a protest vote against her in the primary. If she got the nomination for President I would vote for her holding my nose BUT...

hasn't that "Batshit Crazy Lying Jackoff Joe" in Ct. proven that a Dem who supports the war will never win the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its a mainly Republican thing...............
so they can vote against her. She is not well liked contrary to running polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hoping for LOTS of protest votes
I'm now registered to vote in NY and will be casting my vote for Tasini. I talk about him and his platform to friends as often as I can...amazes me how many people still have not heard of him and don't even realize that he's on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:08 PM
Original message
That happens when you run an awful campaign.
Tasini should be thanking NY1. Without their idiocy, people still wouldn't know who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Tasini's website
http://www.tasinifornewyork.org/ For those here who don't know about Tasini yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Repubs have been touting her as the frontrunner because they
see her as the easy target. She has a mixed bag of positions, many of which i like, but having her on the ticket would have repubs digging up their long-dead grandmothers to bring to the polls to vote against her. Keep her as an effective senator, not as a toxic presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Republicans seriously underestimate her, or
they seriously overestimate her (as some kind of anti-christ).

They underestimate her political savvy, just like many here do.

If she runs in 2008, I'm voting for her. If the GOP nominates anyone but Rudy or McCain, she can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has Cynthia McKinney proven that you can't win as an anti-war candidate?
I thinbk both cases are exceptions to the rule.

Joe is pro-war but it is his constant criticism of his own party, silence on the GOP's failures and general all around political tone deafness that ultimately did him in.

Cynthia while anti-war was voted out whith her stance on the war having little to do with it.

If anti-war sentiment was the driving force, Tasini wouldn't be losing by 60+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. McKinney's stance on the war had little to do with her ousting...
It was her generally bizarre and erratic behavior that created the "crazy" aura around her. Her opponent might have been very DLC-like but the point was he was white bread and plain compared to someone who had been portrayed as whacko.

Her positions had little to do with her election losses. Her character and the cartoonish nature in which she was depicted, did.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That was my point.
That Joe-mentum's behavior rather than his war stance is what ultimatelky cost him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't think so in this case
Edited on Wed Aug-23-06 03:28 PM by MessiahRp
Yeah he was extremely ornary with Lamont (kind of a "how dare he challenge me" attitude) during the primary but Lieberman's support of the War is what lost him that election. He might be a tad more buddy-buddy with Bush than say Hillary but if Tasini were able to get some ads out with Hillary's completely pro war stances (not too far from Joe's up until Lamonts win) on it would make a dent. She is a more powerful figure though than he is nationally and is more visible.

If we talk about regular politicians nationally there's only a few states where the 100% pro-war stance would not be crippled by an effectively run campaign from a capable opponent.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I disagree.
Joe-mentum was a perfect storm for the netroots.

He was a socially conservative Democrat in a generally liberal state.

He was buddy buddy with Bush

He was harshly critical of his own party and its members.

He was blamed for Gore's loss.

He had an opponent with enough cash to stay in the race.

He was the prime target of the entire left blogosphere who hammered him constantly.

It wasn't just his pro-war votes. It was his saddling up to and endorsing the GOP view of the war. Not the pro-war Dem view, the GOP view.

"if Tasini were able to get some ads out with Hillary's completely pro war stances (not too far from Joe's up until Lamonts win) on it would make a dent"

What 5pts? Maybe 10pts? Have you seen Hillary's approval #'s from Dems and liberals?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Of course, Tasini's problems might have something to do with
him having $200,000 and Hillary having $44,000,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And $32,000 of that is from himself and his wife
He's had 9 months since he declared his candidacy. If you can only raise that much as the "anti war" candidate in New York which has money and anti-war sentiment against a figure that is "supposedly" hated in NY(I say supposedly because DUers are constantly telling us how shitty and hated she is), well you are running a shitty campaign.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. can you link to where HRC called for more troops in Iraq?
I know in 2003 she called for more troops in Afghanistan, and in 2004 she, along with Lindsey Graham, called for a larger military - to take the pressure off of troops serving mutiple tours in Iraq and other places.

I would really like to see a link to her call for more troops in Iraq, at the very least so that I could understand the context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. She Is So Divisive That She Would Lose The Presidency For The Party
Its really that simple. No Republican would vote for her and a lot of Democrats simply would not vote for President rather than vote for her. Put that combination together and virtually any Republican, even Jeb, could beat her.

And that is why she must not be permitted to take the Candidacy of our Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm just not excited enough about Hilary
I'm tired of politicians trying to please everyone else, and not just be themselves. That's why I always loved Dean. He never seems afraid to speak his mind. Maybe the Hilary of the 60's and 70's would be someone I would vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Uh, the Hillary of the 60s was a Goldwater Girl.
She didn't convert until after she met Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You're kidding!
I had no idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's because you obviously don't speak "exceedingly bad idea".
I think you've got the right idea with your avatar, BTW.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC