Should the architects of the Iraq invasion be tried for War Crimes?

[NNN0LHI]

[ixion]

1. without question

because they are guilty of war crimes, IMO.

[bryant69]

2. It's unlikely they will be though

Another relevent question is what political price should we be able to pay to see that they are tried for war crimes.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[TheFriedPiper]

3. Of COURSE!!! this is a no-brainer!

I doubt anyone would possibly vote 'no' on this. Might as well be asking if gravity is still working.

[MarinCoUSA]

4. If we don't, what will we tell the children?

n/t

[driver8]

5. Definitely.

But as I told my wife yesterday, our country doesn't have "the sack" to try them.

[porphyrian]

6. And treason to our country. - n/t

[El Fuego]

7. Of course.

[MrCoffee]

8. A better poll question for DU...Is rain wet?

[Jacobin]

9. It took forty years to get Pinochet for his war crimes

They still haven't gotten Kissinger, but he can't go to Europe for fear of arrest.

I hope one day before these guys croak they are brought to justice

[IChing]

10. Of Course "It's a matter of simple justice"

which is described here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1964494

[TahitiNut]

11. (To quote my Army Basic Training DI:) "Absofuckinglutely!"

Unless and until the top 20-30 war criminals in this regime are imprisoned for 20 years to life, we're an outlaw nation with absolutely no claim to any high moral or political ground whatsoever. Lesser functionaries should receive sentences of up to 5 or 10 years.

[TahitiNut]

12. Who'da guessed DU was 8% "Total Fucking Morons"?

Go figure! :shrug: :eyes:



:evilgrin:

[Greyhound]

13. Yes and in the International Criminal Court, since we cannot trust our

Judiciary to follow the law any longer.

BTW, Why don't those that answered 'no' post their justifications? :spank: